Test-Retest Reliability of Repetitive Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Myasthenia Gravis Patients and Healthy Control Subjects.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-29 DOI:10.1097/WNP.0000000000000956
Kevin R Keene, Julia Bongers, Robert H P de Meel, Jeroen Venhovens, Jan J G M Verschuuren, Martijn R Tannemaat
{"title":"Test-Retest Reliability of Repetitive Ocular Vestibular Evoked Myogenic Potentials in Myasthenia Gravis Patients and Healthy Control Subjects.","authors":"Kevin R Keene, Julia Bongers, Robert H P de Meel, Jeroen Venhovens, Jan J G M Verschuuren, Martijn R Tannemaat","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000000956","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Repetitive ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (ROVEMP) are a novel diagnostic test to quantify neuromuscular transmission deficits in extraocular muscles in myasthenia gravis. We aimed to investigate the test-retest reliability of the ROVEMP and the effect of amplitude and age.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed the ROVEMP test twice in 19 patients with myasthenia gravis (52.7 ± 19.8 years) and in 15 healthy control subjects (46.5 ± 16 years). The Bland-Altman level of agreement was determined. The relationship between test-retest reliability and signal quality, participant age and signal amplitude was studied.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Limits of agreement were from -179.9 to 139.3 in myasthenia gravis patients and from -56.9 to 89.5 in healthy control subjects. Difference between measurements correlated with signal amplitude ( r = -0.50, P < 0.001). Combining the primary cohort with previously published data from 114 subjects, we found a significant negative correlation between age and reference amplitude ( r = -0.163, P = 0.045).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study shows that in our hands, the test-retest reliability of the ROVEMP is not optimal. Measurements with higher reference amplitude had a better quality, higher reproducibility, and increased diagnostic yield. We caution against the use of ROVEMP measurements of lower amplitude in clinical practice. In addition, given the correlation between age and amplitude, age matching of healthy control subjects and patients is essential in future studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15516,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10898539/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000956","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Repetitive ocular vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (ROVEMP) are a novel diagnostic test to quantify neuromuscular transmission deficits in extraocular muscles in myasthenia gravis. We aimed to investigate the test-retest reliability of the ROVEMP and the effect of amplitude and age.

Methods: We performed the ROVEMP test twice in 19 patients with myasthenia gravis (52.7 ± 19.8 years) and in 15 healthy control subjects (46.5 ± 16 years). The Bland-Altman level of agreement was determined. The relationship between test-retest reliability and signal quality, participant age and signal amplitude was studied.

Results: Limits of agreement were from -179.9 to 139.3 in myasthenia gravis patients and from -56.9 to 89.5 in healthy control subjects. Difference between measurements correlated with signal amplitude ( r = -0.50, P < 0.001). Combining the primary cohort with previously published data from 114 subjects, we found a significant negative correlation between age and reference amplitude ( r = -0.163, P = 0.045).

Conclusions: This study shows that in our hands, the test-retest reliability of the ROVEMP is not optimal. Measurements with higher reference amplitude had a better quality, higher reproducibility, and increased diagnostic yield. We caution against the use of ROVEMP measurements of lower amplitude in clinical practice. In addition, given the correlation between age and amplitude, age matching of healthy control subjects and patients is essential in future studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肌无力患者和健康对照组重复性眼前庭诱发肌源性电位的测试-重测可靠性
目的:重复性眼前庭诱发肌源性电位(ROVEMP)是一种新型诊断测试,用于量化重症肌无力患者眼外肌的神经肌肉传导缺陷。我们的目的是研究 ROVEMP 的测试重复可靠性以及振幅和年龄的影响:我们对 19 名重症肌无力患者(52.7 ± 19.8 岁)和 15 名健康对照组受试者(46.5 ± 16 岁)进行了两次 ROVEMP 测试。测定了 Bland-Altman 一致性水平。研究了重复测试可靠性与信号质量、参与者年龄和信号振幅之间的关系:肌无力患者和健康对照组的测量结果一致度分别为-179.9至139.3,-56.9至89.5。测量值之间的差异与信号振幅相关(r = -0.50,P < 0.001)。将主要队列与之前公布的 114 名受试者的数据相结合,我们发现年龄与参考振幅之间存在显著的负相关(r = -0.163,P = 0.045):本研究表明,在我们手中,ROVEMP 的测试-再测可靠性并不理想。参考振幅越高,测量质量越好,可重复性越高,诊断率也越高。我们提醒临床实践中不要使用振幅较低的 ROVEMP 测量值。此外,鉴于年龄与振幅之间的相关性,在未来的研究中,健康对照组和患者的年龄匹配至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology
Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.20%
发文量
198
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​The Journal of Clinical Neurophysiology features both topical reviews and original research in both central and peripheral neurophysiology, as related to patient evaluation and treatment. Official Journal of the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society.
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic Value of Bereitschaftspotential in People With Functional Seizures. Chronobiological Spatial Clusters of Cortical Regions in the Human Brain. Classifying High-Frequency Oscillations by Morphologic Contrast to Background, With Surgical Outcome Correlates. Is Intraoperative Muscle Motor Evoked Potential Variability due to Fluctuating Lower Motor Neuron Background Excitability? Book Review for Neuromuscular and Electrodiagnostic Medicine Board Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1