Implementation Science Toolkit for Clinicians: Improving Adoption of Evidence in Practice.

Staci S Reynolds, Bradi B Granger
{"title":"Implementation Science Toolkit for Clinicians: Improving Adoption of Evidence in Practice.","authors":"Staci S Reynolds,&nbsp;Bradi B Granger","doi":"10.1097/DCC.0000000000000556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinicians are often familiar with quality improvement (QI) and evidence-based practice (EBP) processes, which provides guidance into what evidence should be implemented; however, these processes do not address how to successfully implement evidence.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Clinicians would benefit from a deeper understanding of implementation science, along with practical tools for how to use these principles in QI and EBP projects.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We provide a brief background of the principles of implementation science, an overview of current implementation science models and a toolkit to facilitate choosing and using common implementation science strategies. In addition, the toolkit provides guidance for measuring the success of an implementation science project and a case study showing how implementation science strategies can be used successfully in clinical practice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using an implementation science toolkit for designing, conducting, and evaluating a QI or EBP project improves the quality and generalizability of results.</p>","PeriodicalId":46646,"journal":{"name":"Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing","volume":"42 1","pages":"33-41"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/DCC.0000000000000556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Clinicians are often familiar with quality improvement (QI) and evidence-based practice (EBP) processes, which provides guidance into what evidence should be implemented; however, these processes do not address how to successfully implement evidence.

Objective: Clinicians would benefit from a deeper understanding of implementation science, along with practical tools for how to use these principles in QI and EBP projects.

Methods: We provide a brief background of the principles of implementation science, an overview of current implementation science models and a toolkit to facilitate choosing and using common implementation science strategies. In addition, the toolkit provides guidance for measuring the success of an implementation science project and a case study showing how implementation science strategies can be used successfully in clinical practice.

Conclusions: Using an implementation science toolkit for designing, conducting, and evaluating a QI or EBP project improves the quality and generalizability of results.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床医生实施科学工具包:在实践中提高证据的采用。
背景:临床医生通常熟悉质量改进(QI)和循证实践(EBP)流程,这为应该实施哪些证据提供了指导;然而,这些流程并没有解决如何成功地实施证据。目的:临床医生将受益于对实施科学的深入理解,以及如何在QI和EBP项目中使用这些原则的实用工具。方法:我们简要介绍了实施科学原理的背景,概述了当前的实施科学模型,并提供了一个工具包,以方便选择和使用常见的实施科学策略。此外,该工具包为衡量实施科学项目的成功提供了指导,并提供了一个案例研究,展示了如何在临床实践中成功地使用实施科学策略。结论:使用实现科学工具包来设计、指导和评估QI或EBP项目,可以提高结果的质量和普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
102
期刊介绍: The primary purpose of Dimensions of Critical Care Nursing™ is to provide nurses with accurate, current, and relevant information and services to excel in critical care practice.
期刊最新文献
Assessment for Enteral Feeding Intolerance by Critical Care Nurses: A National Survey. Belongingness and Retention-Fostering the Connection. Call for Manuscripts. Comparison of 2-Bag Method With Serial Bag Method for Treatment of Pediatric Diabetic Ketoacidosis. Competency Development for E-Mentors of Undergraduate Nursing Students Using E-Delphi Method.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1