{"title":"Markets, merit and the dignity of labour.","authors":"Robert Sugden","doi":"10.1007/s12232-022-00402-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In <i>The Tyranny of Merit</i>, Sandel recasts the discontent expressed in populism as a rejection of market morality and as an inarticulate plea for the restoration of civic virtue. He argues that a 'market-based globalisation project' has fostered meritocratic ideas which humiliate the victims of that project and undermine the dignity of labour. I question Sandel's claim that meritocracy is a market value and the dignity of labour is not. I argue that his account of a moral alternative to normal market institutions-an economy in which individuals' rewards are somehow aligned with their true merits-is deeply incoherent.</p>","PeriodicalId":40021,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics","volume":"69 3","pages":"323-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9374612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-022-00402-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
In The Tyranny of Merit, Sandel recasts the discontent expressed in populism as a rejection of market morality and as an inarticulate plea for the restoration of civic virtue. He argues that a 'market-based globalisation project' has fostered meritocratic ideas which humiliate the victims of that project and undermine the dignity of labour. I question Sandel's claim that meritocracy is a market value and the dignity of labour is not. I argue that his account of a moral alternative to normal market institutions-an economy in which individuals' rewards are somehow aligned with their true merits-is deeply incoherent.
期刊介绍:
International Review of Economics - Journal of Civil Economy (IREC) covers a broad range of macro- and microeconomic topics, and showcases high-quality empirical, theoretical and policy-oriented contributions. In particular, IREC welcomes papers focused on the analysis of social interactions, wellbeing, welfare and happiness, capabilities, reciprocity, trust, relational goods, formal and informal institutions, law and economics, prizes and incentives, economics and philosophy, economic theology, the history of economic thought, non-profit organizations, and social economy. Civil Economy refers to a 18th-century Southern European tradition, which views the market as a pre-condition for civilization. Today, Civil Economy denotes a special focus on the ‘civil’ and ethical dimensions of economic issues, and on pursuing the common good in the economic domain. Officially cited as: Int Rev Econ