Markets, merit and the dignity of labour.

Q2 Economics, Econometrics and Finance International Review of Economics Pub Date : 2022-01-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-08 DOI:10.1007/s12232-022-00402-7
Robert Sugden
{"title":"Markets, merit and the dignity of labour.","authors":"Robert Sugden","doi":"10.1007/s12232-022-00402-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In <i>The Tyranny of Merit</i>, Sandel recasts the discontent expressed in populism as a rejection of market morality and as an inarticulate plea for the restoration of civic virtue. He argues that a 'market-based globalisation project' has fostered meritocratic ideas which humiliate the victims of that project and undermine the dignity of labour. I question Sandel's claim that meritocracy is a market value and the dignity of labour is not. I argue that his account of a moral alternative to normal market institutions-an economy in which individuals' rewards are somehow aligned with their true merits-is deeply incoherent.</p>","PeriodicalId":40021,"journal":{"name":"International Review of Economics","volume":"69 3","pages":"323-338"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9374612/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Review of Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-022-00402-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/8 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In The Tyranny of Merit, Sandel recasts the discontent expressed in populism as a rejection of market morality and as an inarticulate plea for the restoration of civic virtue. He argues that a 'market-based globalisation project' has fostered meritocratic ideas which humiliate the victims of that project and undermine the dignity of labour. I question Sandel's claim that meritocracy is a market value and the dignity of labour is not. I argue that his account of a moral alternative to normal market institutions-an economy in which individuals' rewards are somehow aligned with their true merits-is deeply incoherent.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
市场,价值和劳动的尊严。
在《功绩的暴政》一书中,桑德尔将民粹主义中表达的不满重新定义为对市场道德的拒绝,以及对恢复公民美德的含糊请求。他认为,“以市场为基础的全球化项目”培育了精英主义思想,羞辱了该项目的受害者,损害了劳工的尊严。我质疑桑德尔的说法,即任人唯贤是一种市场价值,而劳动的尊严不是。我认为,他对正常市场制度之外的道德选择的描述——在这种经济中,个人的回报在某种程度上与他们的真正价值相一致——是非常不连贯的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
International Review of Economics
International Review of Economics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊介绍: International Review of Economics - Journal of Civil Economy (IREC) covers a broad range of macro- and microeconomic topics, and showcases high-quality empirical, theoretical and policy-oriented contributions. In particular, IREC welcomes papers focused on the analysis of social interactions, wellbeing, welfare and happiness, capabilities, reciprocity, trust, relational goods, formal and informal institutions, law and economics, prizes and incentives, economics and philosophy, economic theology, the history of economic thought, non-profit organizations, and social economy. Civil Economy refers to a 18th-century Southern European tradition, which views the market as a pre-condition for civilization. Today, Civil Economy denotes a special focus on the ‘civil’ and ethical dimensions of economic issues, and on pursuing the common good in the economic domain. Officially cited as: Int Rev Econ
期刊最新文献
Impact of mobile financial services on financial inclusion: empirical insights from Kenya Tax morale: a global scoping review from the cultural approach to economics Causality between stock indices and cryptocurrencies before and during the Russo–Ukrainian war Personal income tax, redistribution and income inequality in Sub-Saharan Africa Reconnoitering FinTech's moderating effect on the determinants of women's financial literacy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1