How can research institutions support responsible supervision and leadership?

IF 2.8 1区哲学 Q1 MEDICAL ETHICS Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2022-08-24 DOI:10.1080/08989621.2022.2112033

Daniel Pizzolato, Krishma Labib, Niko Skoulikaris, Natalie Evans, Rea Roje, Panagiotis Kavouras, Noémie Aubert Bonn, Kris Dierickx, Joeri Tijdink

{"title":"How can research institutions support responsible supervision and leadership?","authors":"Daniel Pizzolato, Krishma Labib, Niko Skoulikaris, Natalie Evans, Rea Roje, Panagiotis Kavouras, Noémie Aubert Bonn, Kris Dierickx, Joeri Tijdink","doi":"10.1080/08989621.2022.2112033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Supervisors, PhD candidates and research leaders are expected to be the primary persons responsible for maintaining a high research integrity standards. However, research institutions should support them in this effort, by promoting responsible supervision and leadership practices. Although it is clear that institutions play a crucial role in this, there is a lack of institutional guidelines focusing on these topics. The development of the experience-based guidelines presented in this article consisted of a multi-step, iterative approach. We engaged 16 experts in supervision and research integrity in four workshops to co-create institutional guidelines for responsible supervision and leadership. To revise the guidelines and make them operational, we formed a dedicated working group and consulted experts in the field of supervision. This resulted in three guidelines focusing on what institutions can do to support: responsible supervision, PhD candidates during their PhD trajectory, and responsible leadership. The recommendations focus on the rights and responsibilities of the three targeted stakeholder groups, and institutions' responsibilities for the personal development and well-being of supervisors, PhD candidates and research leaders. The three guidelines can be used by institutions to foster responsible supervision and leadership by supporting researchers to conduct research with integrity.</p>","PeriodicalId":50927,"journal":{"name":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2112033","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/8/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICAL ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Supervisors, PhD candidates and research leaders are expected to be the primary persons responsible for maintaining a high research integrity standards. However, research institutions should support them in this effort, by promoting responsible supervision and leadership practices. Although it is clear that institutions play a crucial role in this, there is a lack of institutional guidelines focusing on these topics. The development of the experience-based guidelines presented in this article consisted of a multi-step, iterative approach. We engaged 16 experts in supervision and research integrity in four workshops to co-create institutional guidelines for responsible supervision and leadership. To revise the guidelines and make them operational, we formed a dedicated working group and consulted experts in the field of supervision. This resulted in three guidelines focusing on what institutions can do to support: responsible supervision, PhD candidates during their PhD trajectory, and responsible leadership. The recommendations focus on the rights and responsibilities of the three targeted stakeholder groups, and institutions' responsibilities for the personal development and well-being of supervisors, PhD candidates and research leaders. The three guidelines can be used by institutions to foster responsible supervision and leadership by supporting researchers to conduct research with integrity.

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

研究机构如何支持负责任的监督和领导？

导师、博士生和研究带头人是保持较高研究诚信标准的主要责任人。然而，研究机构应通过促进负责任的监督和领导实践，支持他们的这一努力。虽然研究机构显然在这方面发挥着至关重要的作用，但目前却缺乏以这些主题为重点的研究机构指导方针。本文所介绍的以经验为基础的指导方针的制定过程包括一个多步骤的迭代方法。我们邀请了 16 位监督和科研诚信方面的专家参加了四次研讨会，共同制定了负责任监督和领导的机构指南。为了修订指导方针并使其具有可操作性，我们成立了一个专门的工作组，并咨询了督导领域的专家。最终形成了三份指导方针，重点是各机构可以采取哪些措施来支持：负责任的督导、博士生在攻读博士学位期间的表现以及负责任的领导。这些建议的重点是三个目标利益相关群体的权利和责任，以及院校对导师、博士生和研究带头人的个人发展和福祉的责任。各院校可以利用这三项准则，通过支持研究人员诚信开展研究，促进负责任的监督和领导。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文去求助

来源期刊

Accountability in Research-Policies and Quality Assurance MEDICAL ETHICS-

CiteScore

4.90

自引率

14.70%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance is devoted to the examination and critical analysis of systems for maximizing integrity in the conduct of research. It provides an interdisciplinary, international forum for the development of ethics, procedures, standards policies, and concepts to encourage the ethical conduct of research and to enhance the validity of research results. The journal welcomes views on advancing the integrity of research in the fields of general and multidisciplinary sciences, medicine, law, economics, statistics, management studies, public policy, politics, sociology, history, psychology, philosophy, ethics, and information science. All submitted manuscripts are subject to initial appraisal by the Editor, and if found suitable for further consideration, to peer review by independent, anonymous expert referees.