Appropriateness of Pharmacologic Thromboprophylaxis Prescribing Based on Padua Score Among Inpatient Veterans.

Bianca Creith, Gabrielle Givens, Bishoy Ragheb, Nilam Naik, Casey Owen, Jessica Wallace
{"title":"Appropriateness of Pharmacologic Thromboprophylaxis Prescribing Based on Padua Score Among Inpatient Veterans.","authors":"Bianca Creith,&nbsp;Gabrielle Givens,&nbsp;Bishoy Ragheb,&nbsp;Nilam Naik,&nbsp;Casey Owen,&nbsp;Jessica Wallace","doi":"10.12788/fp.0291","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hospitalized patients are at increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). The Padua Prediction Score (PPS) was developed to help quantify the risk of VTE for hospitalized patients and guide prescribing of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. This study aims to assess whether PPS embedded within an admission order set was utilized appropriately to prescribe or withhold pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This single center, retrospective observational cohort study evaluated adult patients aged ≥ 18 years between June 2017 and June 2020. A random sample of 250 patient charts meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed to calculate PPSs, and clinician notes were reviewed for documentation as to whether thromboprophylaxis was given or withheld appropriately based on the PPS. A second cohort of patients admitted within the study period meeting inclusion criteria and readmitted for VTE within 45 days of discharge were evaluated to determine appropriateness of inpatient VTE thromboprophylaxis during index hospitalization based on the PPS.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 250 patients examined, 118 (47.2%) had a PPS < 4 on admission. Of the 118 patients, 58 (49.2%) were inappropriately prescribed pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis administered within 24 hours of admission. The clinical rationale for giving thromboprophylaxis when not indicated was provided for only 2 (3.4%) of the 58 patients. Of the 132 patients with a PPS ≥ 4, 11 (8.3%) had thromboprophylaxis appropriately withheld and for 33 (25.0%) it was inappropriately withheld. A total of 88 (66.7%) patients received thromboprophylaxis as indicated by a PPS ≥ 4.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Despite the inclusion of the PPS calculator in the facility's admission order set, this study showed pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis was frequently inappropriately given or withheld. This suggests written protocols and order sets may not be solely sufficient to ensure appropriate VTE prophylaxis in actual practice. Incorporation of additional tools, such as dashboards and scorecards, should be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":73021,"journal":{"name":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","volume":"39 7","pages":"299-303a"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9648584/pdf/fp-39-07-299.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Federal practitioner : for the health care professionals of the VA, DoD, and PHS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12788/fp.0291","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hospitalized patients are at increased risk of developing venous thromboembolism (VTE). The Padua Prediction Score (PPS) was developed to help quantify the risk of VTE for hospitalized patients and guide prescribing of pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis. This study aims to assess whether PPS embedded within an admission order set was utilized appropriately to prescribe or withhold pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis.

Methods: This single center, retrospective observational cohort study evaluated adult patients aged ≥ 18 years between June 2017 and June 2020. A random sample of 250 patient charts meeting inclusion criteria were reviewed to calculate PPSs, and clinician notes were reviewed for documentation as to whether thromboprophylaxis was given or withheld appropriately based on the PPS. A second cohort of patients admitted within the study period meeting inclusion criteria and readmitted for VTE within 45 days of discharge were evaluated to determine appropriateness of inpatient VTE thromboprophylaxis during index hospitalization based on the PPS.

Results: Of the 250 patients examined, 118 (47.2%) had a PPS < 4 on admission. Of the 118 patients, 58 (49.2%) were inappropriately prescribed pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis administered within 24 hours of admission. The clinical rationale for giving thromboprophylaxis when not indicated was provided for only 2 (3.4%) of the 58 patients. Of the 132 patients with a PPS ≥ 4, 11 (8.3%) had thromboprophylaxis appropriately withheld and for 33 (25.0%) it was inappropriately withheld. A total of 88 (66.7%) patients received thromboprophylaxis as indicated by a PPS ≥ 4.

Conclusions: Despite the inclusion of the PPS calculator in the facility's admission order set, this study showed pharmacologic thromboprophylaxis was frequently inappropriately given or withheld. This suggests written protocols and order sets may not be solely sufficient to ensure appropriate VTE prophylaxis in actual practice. Incorporation of additional tools, such as dashboards and scorecards, should be explored.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于帕多瓦评分的住院退伍军人血栓预防药物处方的适宜性。
背景:住院患者发生静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)的风险增加。开发帕多瓦预测评分(PPS)是为了帮助量化住院患者静脉血栓栓塞的风险,并指导药物血栓预防处方。本研究的目的是评估是否PPS嵌入入院令集被适当地用于开或保留药理学血栓预防。方法:这项单中心、回顾性观察队列研究评估了2017年6月至2020年6月期间年龄≥18岁的成年患者。随机抽取250例符合纳入标准的患者图表进行评估,以计算PPS,并审查临床医生的记录,以确定是否根据PPS适当给予或不给予血栓预防。第二组患者在研究期间入院,符合纳入标准,出院后45天内因静脉血栓栓塞再次入院,评估以PPS为基础的指数住院期间静脉血栓栓塞预防的适宜性。结果:250例患者中,118例(47.2%)入院时PPS < 4。在118名患者中,58名(49.2%)患者在入院24小时内不适当地给予了药物血栓预防。58例患者中只有2例(3.4%)提供了在无指征时给予血栓预防的临床理由。在132例PPS≥4的患者中,11例(8.3%)有适当的血栓预防,33例(25.0%)有不适当的血栓预防。共有88例(66.7%)患者接受了PPS≥4的血栓预防治疗。结论:尽管在医院的入院单中包含了PPS计算器,但这项研究显示药理学血栓预防经常被不恰当地给予或拒绝。这表明书面协议和指令集可能不足以确保在实际操作中适当的静脉血栓栓塞预防。应该探索合并其他工具,如仪表板和记分卡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Olfactory Hallucinations Following COVID-19 Vaccination. Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Outcomes by p16INK4a Antigen Status in a Veteran Population. Outcomes in Patients With Curative Malignancies Receiving Filgrastim as Primary Prophylaxis. Contralateral Constrictor Dose Predicts Swallowing Function After Radiation for Head and Neck Cancer. Acute Painful Horner Syndrome as the First Presenting Sign of Carotid Artery Dissection.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1