Caste and COVID-19: Psychosocial disparities amongst rural Indian women during the coronavirus pandemic

IF 4 1区 社会学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Social Issues Pub Date : 2022-07-28 DOI:10.1111/josi.12532
Zishan Jiwani, Vaishali V. Raval, Miriam Steele, Simon B. Goldberg
{"title":"Caste and COVID-19: Psychosocial disparities amongst rural Indian women during the coronavirus pandemic","authors":"Zishan Jiwani,&nbsp;Vaishali V. Raval,&nbsp;Miriam Steele,&nbsp;Simon B. Goldberg","doi":"10.1111/josi.12532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated preexisting mental health disparities. In India, marginalization based on caste membership, gender, and rural residence are critical determinants of inequity across the lifespan. Guided by the theoretical frameworks of minority stress and intersectionality, this study examined caste-based disparities in fear of coronavirus (FOC), mental health symptoms, and perceived loneliness amongst rural women in north India during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants (<i>N</i> = 316) completed self-report measures and were classified into three groups based on their responses: General caste (GC, <i>n</i> = 124), other backward castes (OBC, <i>n</i> = 122), and scheduled caste or tribe (SC/ST, <i>n</i> = 71). Using a three-way ANOVA and Tukey <i>t</i>-tests, women in SC/ST and OBC groups reported greater FOC (OBC <i>d</i> = .37; SC/ST <i>d</i> = .40) and greater mental health symptoms (OBC <i>d</i> = .58; SC/ST <i>d</i> = .43) relative to the GC group. OBC, but not SC/ST, group also reported higher perceived loneliness (<i>d</i> = .32). The results were consistent after adjusting for demographic variables such as wealth and highlight caste as an important social determinant for well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic amongst rural Indian women.</p>","PeriodicalId":17008,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Social Issues","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9353364/pdf/JOSI-9999-0.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Social Issues","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/josi.12532","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has exacerbated preexisting mental health disparities. In India, marginalization based on caste membership, gender, and rural residence are critical determinants of inequity across the lifespan. Guided by the theoretical frameworks of minority stress and intersectionality, this study examined caste-based disparities in fear of coronavirus (FOC), mental health symptoms, and perceived loneliness amongst rural women in north India during the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants (N = 316) completed self-report measures and were classified into three groups based on their responses: General caste (GC, n = 124), other backward castes (OBC, n = 122), and scheduled caste or tribe (SC/ST, n = 71). Using a three-way ANOVA and Tukey t-tests, women in SC/ST and OBC groups reported greater FOC (OBC d = .37; SC/ST d = .40) and greater mental health symptoms (OBC d = .58; SC/ST d = .43) relative to the GC group. OBC, but not SC/ST, group also reported higher perceived loneliness (d = .32). The results were consistent after adjusting for demographic variables such as wealth and highlight caste as an important social determinant for well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic amongst rural Indian women.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
种姓与COVID-19:冠状病毒大流行期间印度农村妇女的社会心理差异
COVID-19大流行加剧了先前存在的心理健康差距。在印度,基于种姓、性别和农村居住的边缘化是一生中不平等的关键决定因素。在少数民族压力和交叉性理论框架的指导下,本研究调查了2019冠状病毒病大流行期间印度北部农村妇女在冠状病毒恐惧(FOC)、心理健康症状和感知孤独方面的种姓差异。参与者(N = 316)完成了自我报告测量,并根据他们的回答分为三组:一般种姓(GC, N = 124),其他落后种姓(OBC, N = 122)和预定种姓或部落(SC/ST, N = 71)。通过三向方差分析和Tukey t检验,SC/ST组和OBC组的女性报告了更高的FOC (OBC d = 0.37;SC/ST d = 0.40)和更严重的精神健康症状(OBC d = 0.58;SC/ST d = .43)相对于GC组。OBC组,而不是SC/ST组,也报告了更高的感知孤独(d = .32)。在调整了财富等人口变量后,结果是一致的,并强调种姓是2019冠状病毒病大流行期间印度农村妇女福祉的重要社会决定因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
7.70%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: Published for The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues (SPSSI), the Journal of Social Issues (JSI) brings behavioral and social science theory, empirical evidence, and practice to bear on human and social problems. Each issue of the journal focuses on a single topic - recent issues, for example, have addressed poverty, housing and health; privacy as a social and psychological concern; youth and violence; and the impact of social class on education.
期刊最新文献
Psychosocial correlates of LGBTIQ+ experiences in selected African countries: Reimagining LGBTIQ+ research Understanding variations in LGBTIQ+ acceptance across space and time: The importance of norm perceptions and political dynamics Centering the margins: Reimagining resilience and resistance for transgender and nonbinary people of color The opportunities and limits of open science for LGBTIQ+ research Both‐Sideology Endangers Democracy and Social Science
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1