Assessing Third-Year Medical Students' Perspective on Point of Care Testing Boot Camp: From Bench to Bedside.

Q2 Medicine Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2022-10-28 eCollection Date: 2022-10-01
Sibtain Ahmed, Lena Jafri, Hafsa Majid, Shahid Shakeel, Shuja Ahmed, Aysha Habib Khan
{"title":"Assessing Third-Year Medical Students' Perspective on Point of Care Testing Boot Camp: From Bench to Bedside.","authors":"Sibtain Ahmed,&nbsp;Lena Jafri,&nbsp;Hafsa Majid,&nbsp;Shahid Shakeel,&nbsp;Shuja Ahmed,&nbsp;Aysha Habib Khan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Point-of-care testing (POCT), which is also known as bed side-testing, has been integrated into the healthcare system, offering faster results that can lead to improved patient outcomes. POCT was missing from the medical education curriculum in our institute.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The primary objective of this study was to describe the development and introduce POCT training for medical students in a medical college in Pakistan.Secondary objectives were to evaluate student performance on POCT content and to assess the impact of POCT training via students' feedback.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>The boot camp experience was devised, directed, and facilitated by team constituting of Chemical Pathology faculty members, laboratory technologists and teaching assistants. The program included presentations, demonstrations of POCT instrument handling, supervised hands-on individual performance on glucometer using quality control specimens, competency assessment and sign off followed by interactive case-based discussions. A knowledge quiz via Kahoot was administered at the beginning and end of the experience and scores were compared statistically. Online evaluation and feedback were designed via virtual learning environment based on 10 questions regarding the program and methodology using on a five-point Likert Scale. Frequencies were generated and t-tests were employed to determine pre-post differences.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The boot camp was spread over 2 days and ran three hours each day with the third-year medical students class split into two groups (n=80). On knowledge evaluation, the mean group pre and post test scores were 45% and 95% respectively (p-value =< 0.05). On documented structured competency assessment form a score of 95 was achieved by 100% participants. Positive feedback of 4 or more was recorded on the Likert's scale by 100% respondents.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This POCT boot camp experience can be used by other institutions and can be applied at different times during the medical school curriculum and other professional education programs. This bootcamp will be helpful to educate medical students, postgraduate trainees and field workers working in rural areas and in low resource settings to deliver reliable POC tests results. Future research should examine these students' competence in achieving POCT skills when they enter in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":37192,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","volume":"33 3","pages":"252-261"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/fe/71/ejifcc-33-252.PMC9644088.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Point-of-care testing (POCT), which is also known as bed side-testing, has been integrated into the healthcare system, offering faster results that can lead to improved patient outcomes. POCT was missing from the medical education curriculum in our institute.

Objectives: The primary objective of this study was to describe the development and introduce POCT training for medical students in a medical college in Pakistan.Secondary objectives were to evaluate student performance on POCT content and to assess the impact of POCT training via students' feedback.

Methodology: The boot camp experience was devised, directed, and facilitated by team constituting of Chemical Pathology faculty members, laboratory technologists and teaching assistants. The program included presentations, demonstrations of POCT instrument handling, supervised hands-on individual performance on glucometer using quality control specimens, competency assessment and sign off followed by interactive case-based discussions. A knowledge quiz via Kahoot was administered at the beginning and end of the experience and scores were compared statistically. Online evaluation and feedback were designed via virtual learning environment based on 10 questions regarding the program and methodology using on a five-point Likert Scale. Frequencies were generated and t-tests were employed to determine pre-post differences.

Results: The boot camp was spread over 2 days and ran three hours each day with the third-year medical students class split into two groups (n=80). On knowledge evaluation, the mean group pre and post test scores were 45% and 95% respectively (p-value =< 0.05). On documented structured competency assessment form a score of 95 was achieved by 100% participants. Positive feedback of 4 or more was recorded on the Likert's scale by 100% respondents.

Conclusion: This POCT boot camp experience can be used by other institutions and can be applied at different times during the medical school curriculum and other professional education programs. This bootcamp will be helpful to educate medical students, postgraduate trainees and field workers working in rural areas and in low resource settings to deliver reliable POC tests results. Future research should examine these students' competence in achieving POCT skills when they enter in clinical practice.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估三年级医学生对护理点测试训练营的看法:从工作台到床边。
背景:护理点检测(POCT),也被称为床边检测,已被整合到医疗保健系统中,提供更快的结果,从而改善患者的预后。我院医学教育课程中缺少POCT。目的:本研究的主要目的是描述巴基斯坦一所医学院医学生POCT培训的发展和介绍。次要目标是评估学生对POCT内容的表现,并通过学生的反馈评估POCT培训的影响。方法:新兵训练营的经验是由化学病理学教师、实验室技术人员和助教组成的团队设计、指导和促进的。该计划包括演讲、POCT仪器操作演示、监督个人使用质量控制标本在血糖仪上的实际操作、能力评估和签字,随后是基于案例的互动讨论。在体验开始和结束时,通过Kahoot进行知识测验,并对得分进行统计比较。在线评估和反馈是通过虚拟学习环境设计的,基于10个关于程序和方法的问题,使用五点李克特量表。产生频率并采用t检验来确定前后差异。结果:新兵训练营为期2天,每天运行3小时,三年级医学生班分为两组(n=80)。在知识评价方面,实验组前测和后测的平均得分分别为45%和95% (p值=< 0.05)。在结构化的能力评估表格中,100%的参与者达到了95分。100%的受访者在李克特量表上记录了4分或以上的积极反馈。结论:POCT训练营经验可供其他机构借鉴,可应用于医学院课程和其他专业教育项目的不同阶段。该训练营将有助于教育在农村地区和资源匮乏环境中工作的医学生、研究生培训生和实地工作人员提供可靠的POC测试结果。未来的研究应检查这些学生在进入临床实践时获得POCT技能的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adolopment of Recommendations for Standardized Reporting of Protein Electrophoresis in Pakistan. Continuous reference intervals for plasma cystatin C and creatinine in Vietnamese children. Correlation Analysis of Direct LDL Measurement and Calculated LDL Methods in Lipid Profile Assessment: A Comprehensive Study. Diagnostic Accuracy of Creatinine-Based Equations for eGFR Estimation in Pakistanis: Evaluation of the European Kidney Function Consortium Equation vs the CKD-EPI Pakistan Equation. Integrating Patient-Generated Health Data from Mobile Devices into Electronic Health Records: Best Practice Recommendations by the IFCC Committee on Mobile Health and Bioengineering in Laboratory Medicine (C-MHBLM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1