Importance of Interpretative Comments in Clinical Biochemistry - a Practitioner's Report.

Q2 Medicine Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Pub Date : 2022-10-28 eCollection Date: 2022-10-01
Vivek Pant, Santosh Pradhan
{"title":"Importance of Interpretative Comments in Clinical Biochemistry - a Practitioner's Report.","authors":"Vivek Pant,&nbsp;Santosh Pradhan","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Interpretative comment (IC) from the clinical biochemist is a professional obligation. Most of the Nepalese clinical laboratories use only predefined comments on the report, while few laboratories do not provide comments at all. Apart from doctors, other healthcare professionals and sometimes patients themselves seek laboratory expert opinion in the interpretation of obtained results. The non-availability of patient's medical record or limited communication with physicians as well as insufficient professional knowledge impacts the quality of interpretative comments in Nepal. This report is intended to emphasize that the task of providing IC is becoming more important in the context of Nepal. Similarly, this report also guides those who provide interpretative comments.</p>","PeriodicalId":37192,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","volume":"33 3","pages":"213-219"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/00/70/ejifcc-33-213.PMC9644091.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Interpretative comment (IC) from the clinical biochemist is a professional obligation. Most of the Nepalese clinical laboratories use only predefined comments on the report, while few laboratories do not provide comments at all. Apart from doctors, other healthcare professionals and sometimes patients themselves seek laboratory expert opinion in the interpretation of obtained results. The non-availability of patient's medical record or limited communication with physicians as well as insufficient professional knowledge impacts the quality of interpretative comments in Nepal. This report is intended to emphasize that the task of providing IC is becoming more important in the context of Nepal. Similarly, this report also guides those who provide interpretative comments.

Abstract Image

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
临床生物化学中解释性评论的重要性——一份执业报告。
临床生物化学家的解释性评论(IC)是一项职业义务。大多数尼泊尔临床实验室只对报告使用预先定义的评论,而少数实验室根本不提供评论。除医生外,其他医疗专业人员,有时病人自己也会在解释所获得的结果时寻求实验室专家的意见。无法获得病人的医疗记录或与医生的沟通有限以及专业知识不足影响了尼泊尔解释性评论的质量。本报告的目的是强调,在尼泊尔的情况下,提供集成电路的任务正变得越来越重要。同样,本报告也指导提供解释性评论的人员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Adolopment of Recommendations for Standardized Reporting of Protein Electrophoresis in Pakistan. Continuous reference intervals for plasma cystatin C and creatinine in Vietnamese children. Correlation Analysis of Direct LDL Measurement and Calculated LDL Methods in Lipid Profile Assessment: A Comprehensive Study. Diagnostic Accuracy of Creatinine-Based Equations for eGFR Estimation in Pakistanis: Evaluation of the European Kidney Function Consortium Equation vs the CKD-EPI Pakistan Equation. Integrating Patient-Generated Health Data from Mobile Devices into Electronic Health Records: Best Practice Recommendations by the IFCC Committee on Mobile Health and Bioengineering in Laboratory Medicine (C-MHBLM).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1