Nurses' Perceptions of the Management of Acute Pain in Emergency Departments: Cross-sectional Study.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Clinical Nurse Specialist Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1097/NUR.0000000000000694
Jenni Hämäläinen, Tarja Kvist, Elina Koota, Päivi Kankkunen
{"title":"Nurses' Perceptions of the Management of Acute Pain in Emergency Departments: Cross-sectional Study.","authors":"Jenni Hämäläinen,&nbsp;Tarja Kvist,&nbsp;Elina Koota,&nbsp;Päivi Kankkunen","doi":"10.1097/NUR.0000000000000694","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aim: </strong>This study aimed to describe registered nurses' perceptions of acute pain management in emergency departments.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>The study design was a cross-sectional survey carried out in accordance with Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. One hundred one nurses from 5 different emergency departments participated in the survey.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were analyzed using descriptive methods, nonparametric tests, and principal component analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Continuing education was significantly related to pain management. Nurses who had received continuing pain management education thought more often that challenges in pain management impact patients' acute pain management than those who had not received education. Nurses reported that patients received inadequate pain medication. The most used nonpharmacological methods were ice therapy and postural care. The nurses reported that music and conversation with the patient ameliorated the patients' acute pain. Nurses stated that their lack of knowledge concerning pain management and workload affected their acute pain management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Study results emphasize the need to develop ongoing pain management education for registered nurses and in addition to further research of nonpharmacological alleviation method in emergency departments.</p>","PeriodicalId":55249,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Nurse Specialist","volume":"36 5","pages":"254-263"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Nurse Specialist","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/NUR.0000000000000694","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: This study aimed to describe registered nurses' perceptions of acute pain management in emergency departments.

Design: The study design was a cross-sectional survey carried out in accordance with Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. One hundred one nurses from 5 different emergency departments participated in the survey.

Methods: Data were analyzed using descriptive methods, nonparametric tests, and principal component analysis.

Results: Continuing education was significantly related to pain management. Nurses who had received continuing pain management education thought more often that challenges in pain management impact patients' acute pain management than those who had not received education. Nurses reported that patients received inadequate pain medication. The most used nonpharmacological methods were ice therapy and postural care. The nurses reported that music and conversation with the patient ameliorated the patients' acute pain. Nurses stated that their lack of knowledge concerning pain management and workload affected their acute pain management.

Conclusion: Study results emphasize the need to develop ongoing pain management education for registered nurses and in addition to further research of nonpharmacological alleviation method in emergency departments.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急诊科护士对急性疼痛管理的认知:横断面研究。
目的:本研究旨在了解急诊科注册护士对急性疼痛管理的认知。设计:研究设计是按照《加强流行病学观察性研究报告》指南进行的横断面调查。来自5个不同急诊科的101名护士参与了调查。方法:采用描述性方法、非参数检验和主成分分析对数据进行分析。结果:继续教育与疼痛管理显著相关。接受过持续疼痛管理教育的护士比未接受过持续疼痛管理教育的护士更常认为疼痛管理方面的挑战会影响患者的急性疼痛管理。护士报告说,病人没有得到足够的止痛药。最常用的非药物治疗方法是冰敷和体位护理。护士们报告说,音乐和与病人交谈可以减轻病人的急性疼痛。护士表示,他们缺乏关于疼痛管理和工作量的知识影响了他们的急性疼痛管理。结论:研究结果强调了对注册护士进行持续的疼痛管理教育的必要性,以及对急诊科非药物缓解方法的进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The purpose of Clinical Nurse Specialist™: The International Journal for Advanced Nursing Practice is to disseminate outcomes of clinical nurse specialist practice, to foster continued development o fthe clinical nurse specialist role, and to highlight clinical nurse specialist contributions to advancing nursing practice and health policy globally. Objectives of the journal are: 1. Disseminate knowledge about clinical nurse specialist competencies and the education and regulation of practice; 2. Communicate outcomes of clinical nurse specialist practice on quality, safety, and cost of nursing and health services across the continuum of care; 3. Promote evidence-based practice and innovation in the transformation of nursing and health policy for the betterment of the public welfare; 4. Foster intra-professional and interdisciplinary dialogue addressing nursing and health services for specialty populations in diverse care settings adn cultures.
期刊最新文献
Improving Patient Care Through Collaborative Re-envisioning of the Model of Critical Care. Incorporating Sikh Culture Into Palliative Care of Critically Ill Children. Misuse of External Urine Management Devices in Hospitalized Patients. One Thousand Cranes: The Healing Power of the Ancient Art of Origami. Piloting an Innovative Collaboration Between a Clinical Nurse Specialist Program and a Professional Organization.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1