Comparison of the Efficacy of Intraperitoneal Instillation of Butorphanol Versus Nalbuphine as Adjuvants to Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain Relief in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study.

Anesthesia, Essays and Researches Pub Date : 2022-04-01 Epub Date: 2022-09-02 DOI:10.4103/aer.aer_74_22
Lakshmi Mahajan, Arvinder Pal Singh, Suzen Sumeet Kaur, Anita Kumari
{"title":"Comparison of the Efficacy of Intraperitoneal Instillation of Butorphanol Versus Nalbuphine as Adjuvants to Ropivacaine for Postoperative Pain Relief in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Under General Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Study.","authors":"Lakshmi Mahajan,&nbsp;Arvinder Pal Singh,&nbsp;Suzen Sumeet Kaur,&nbsp;Anita Kumari","doi":"10.4103/aer.aer_74_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aims: </strong>Postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is very common complication hindering the early return of routine activity. Since agonist opioids are not easily available, the most common drug used for intraoperative analgesia is intravenous butorphanol in our institute. The purpose of our study is to compare the analgesic effect of intraperitoneal butorphanol and nalbuphine as additives with ropivacaine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for postoperative pain.</p><p><strong>Setting and design: </strong>Randomized, double-blind prospective study undertaken after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this study, 90 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into three groups: group A received intraperitoneal ropivacaine 0.2% of 20 mL with butorphanol 2 mg; Group B received intraperitoneal ropivacaine 0.2% 20 mL with nalbuphine 10 mg; and Group C received intraperitoneal ropivacaine 0.2% 20 mL with 0.9% normal saline. The primary outcome was to compare the analgesic efficacy of butorphanol with nalbuphine and the duration of postoperative pain relief. The secondary outcomes included the comparison of hemodynamic parameters, frequency of rescue analgesia, and complications among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Statistical analysis: </strong>The data analysis was carried out with ANOVA and Chi-square test using the SPSS software version 26.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The mean of the Numeric Rating Scale pain score was insignificant in Group A versus B at all-time intervals indicating similar efficacy of butorphanol and nalbuphine in terms of pain relief postoperatively. However, the time to first rescue analgesia was significantly higher in Group A (5.70 ± 3.57 h), followed by Group B (3.95 ± 2.06 h) and Group C (2.50 ± 1.24 h).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Butorphanol is better analgesic than nalbuphine as postoperative pain-free period was relatively more with lesser complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":7798,"journal":{"name":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","volume":"16 2","pages":"191-196"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9701337/pdf/","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anesthesia, Essays and Researches","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/aer.aer_74_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background and aims: Postoperative pain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy is very common complication hindering the early return of routine activity. Since agonist opioids are not easily available, the most common drug used for intraoperative analgesia is intravenous butorphanol in our institute. The purpose of our study is to compare the analgesic effect of intraperitoneal butorphanol and nalbuphine as additives with ropivacaine in laparoscopic cholecystectomy for postoperative pain.

Setting and design: Randomized, double-blind prospective study undertaken after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee.

Materials and methods: In this study, 90 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were randomly divided into three groups: group A received intraperitoneal ropivacaine 0.2% of 20 mL with butorphanol 2 mg; Group B received intraperitoneal ropivacaine 0.2% 20 mL with nalbuphine 10 mg; and Group C received intraperitoneal ropivacaine 0.2% 20 mL with 0.9% normal saline. The primary outcome was to compare the analgesic efficacy of butorphanol with nalbuphine and the duration of postoperative pain relief. The secondary outcomes included the comparison of hemodynamic parameters, frequency of rescue analgesia, and complications among the three groups.

Statistical analysis: The data analysis was carried out with ANOVA and Chi-square test using the SPSS software version 26.0.

Results: The mean of the Numeric Rating Scale pain score was insignificant in Group A versus B at all-time intervals indicating similar efficacy of butorphanol and nalbuphine in terms of pain relief postoperatively. However, the time to first rescue analgesia was significantly higher in Group A (5.70 ± 3.57 h), followed by Group B (3.95 ± 2.06 h) and Group C (2.50 ± 1.24 h).

Conclusion: Butorphanol is better analgesic than nalbuphine as postoperative pain-free period was relatively more with lesser complications.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
腹腔注射布托啡诺与纳布啡辅助罗哌卡因对全麻腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者术后疼痛缓解的疗效比较:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究。
背景与目的:腹腔镜胆囊切除术后疼痛是妨碍患者早期恢复日常活动的常见并发症。由于阿片类激动剂不易获得,本院最常用的术中镇痛药物是静脉注射布托啡诺。本研究的目的是比较布托啡诺和纳布啡作为添加剂与罗哌卡因在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中对术后疼痛的镇痛效果。环境和设计:经机构伦理委员会批准后进行的随机、双盲前瞻性研究。材料与方法:本研究将90例腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者随机分为三组:A组患者腹腔注射罗哌卡因0.2% 20 mL,布托啡诺2 mg;B组患者腹腔注射罗哌卡因0.2% 20 mL,联合纳布啡10 mg;C组腹腔注射罗哌卡因0.2% 20 mL,加0.9%生理盐水。主要结局是比较布托啡诺与纳布啡的镇痛效果和术后疼痛缓解的持续时间。次要结局包括三组患者血流动力学参数、抢救镇痛频率和并发症的比较。统计分析:采用SPSS 26.0软件进行方差分析和卡方检验。结果:A组与B组的数值评定量表疼痛评分的平均值在所有时间间隔内均不显著,表明布托啡诺和纳布啡在术后疼痛缓解方面的疗效相似。A组首次抢救镇痛时间(5.70±3.57 h)明显高于B组(3.95±2.06 h)和C组(2.50±1.24 h)。结论:布托啡诺术后无痛时间较长,并发症较少,镇痛效果优于纳布啡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A comparison of two prophylactic doses of ephedrine to attenuate the hemodynamic responses in adults receiving propofol in general anesthesia; a South Indian perspective Comparison of hemodynamic stability with continuous noninvasive blood pressure monitoring and intermittent oscillometric blood pressure monitoring in hospitalized patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis Thoracic epidural analgesia vs. intravenous analgesia in blunt thoracic trauma patients, managed conservatively with noninvasive ventilation (NIV): A prospective observational study Comparison of postoperative analgesic effects of gelfoam soaked with ropivacaine 0.5% and gelfoam soaked with dexamethasone 8 mg with placebo in single-level lumbar laminectomy A Randomised Control Study Comparing C-MAC D-Blade Video Laryngoscope (Hyper Angulated Blade) and Macintosh Laryngoscope for Insertion of a Double-Lumen Tube in Patients Undergoing Elective Thoracotomy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1