Trends in long-term cancer survival in Cali, Colombia: 1998-2017.

Pub Date : 2022-03-30 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.25100/cm.v53i1.5082
Luis Eduardo Bravo, Luz Stella García, Paola Collazos, Jorge Holguín, Isabelle Soerjomataram, Adalberto Miranda-Filho
{"title":"Trends in long-term cancer survival in Cali, Colombia: 1998-2017.","authors":"Luis Eduardo Bravo, Luz Stella García, Paola Collazos, Jorge Holguín, Isabelle Soerjomataram, Adalberto Miranda-Filho","doi":"10.25100/cm.v53i1.5082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Population-based cancer survival is an indicator of the effectiveness of cancer services that reflects the survival of all cancer patients in the population, regardless of socioeconomic status and disease characteristics.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>Provision of an up-to-date survival estimate of patients recorded within Cali Population Cancer Registry (RPCC) in 1998-2017. As a second objective, results will be compared with those reported by the CONCORD study for cancers prioritized by the current Ten-Year Cancer Control Plan of Colombia, 2012-2021.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adult cancer cases (aged 15 to 99 years) for nine cancer types diagnosed between 1998 and 2017, with follow-up to 2018, were obtained from the RPCC. The 5-year age-standardized net survival estimates (NS) were estimated using the Pohar-Perme. The results for the period 1995- 2014 were compared with those reported by the CONCORD study for the following locations: stomach (C16), breast (C50), cervix (C53), prostate (C61), and lung (C33-34).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Five-year survival estimates for breast and prostate cancers improved ten percentage points through 2007 (70.8 to 81.1 for breast and 79.9 to 90.2 for prostate) and remained stable during 2008-2017. For cervical cancer, survival estimates has remained stable for the last two decades at 53%. For stomach cancer and lung cancer, five-year NS was lower than 25% over the study period. For colorectal cancer, survival estimates increased from 37.9% in 1998-2002 to 54.8% in 2013-2017. Compared to previous 5-year survival estimates of cases diagnosed in 2010-2014, the estimates in this study are significantly higher than those obtained by CONCORD. Survival estimates of patients diagnosed in 1995-2009 showed no difference to CONCORD study.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Periodic update of vital status and date of last contact reduces bias in survival estimates in population-based cancer registries with passive follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":" ","pages":"e2035082"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/a9/d1/1657-9534-cm-53-01-e2035082.PMC9688527.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25100/cm.v53i1.5082","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Population-based cancer survival is an indicator of the effectiveness of cancer services that reflects the survival of all cancer patients in the population, regardless of socioeconomic status and disease characteristics.

Aim: Provision of an up-to-date survival estimate of patients recorded within Cali Population Cancer Registry (RPCC) in 1998-2017. As a second objective, results will be compared with those reported by the CONCORD study for cancers prioritized by the current Ten-Year Cancer Control Plan of Colombia, 2012-2021.

Methods: Adult cancer cases (aged 15 to 99 years) for nine cancer types diagnosed between 1998 and 2017, with follow-up to 2018, were obtained from the RPCC. The 5-year age-standardized net survival estimates (NS) were estimated using the Pohar-Perme. The results for the period 1995- 2014 were compared with those reported by the CONCORD study for the following locations: stomach (C16), breast (C50), cervix (C53), prostate (C61), and lung (C33-34).

Results: Five-year survival estimates for breast and prostate cancers improved ten percentage points through 2007 (70.8 to 81.1 for breast and 79.9 to 90.2 for prostate) and remained stable during 2008-2017. For cervical cancer, survival estimates has remained stable for the last two decades at 53%. For stomach cancer and lung cancer, five-year NS was lower than 25% over the study period. For colorectal cancer, survival estimates increased from 37.9% in 1998-2002 to 54.8% in 2013-2017. Compared to previous 5-year survival estimates of cases diagnosed in 2010-2014, the estimates in this study are significantly higher than those obtained by CONCORD. Survival estimates of patients diagnosed in 1995-2009 showed no difference to CONCORD study.

Conclusions: Periodic update of vital status and date of last contact reduces bias in survival estimates in population-based cancer registries with passive follow-up.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
1998-2017年哥伦比亚卡利地区癌症长期生存趋势
背景:基于人口的癌症生存率是癌症服务有效性的指标,反映了人口中所有癌症患者的生存率,而不考虑社会经济地位和疾病特征。目的:提供1998年至2017年卡利人群癌症登记处(RPCC)记录的患者的最新生存率估计。作为第二个目标,将结果与CONCORD研究报告的结果进行比较,该研究针对当前哥伦比亚癌症十年控制计划(2012-2021)中优先考虑的癌症。方法:1998年至2017年间诊断的九种癌症类型的成人癌症病例(15至99岁),以及2018年的随访,从RPCC获得。使用Pohar Perme对5年年龄标准化净生存率估计值(NS)进行估计。将1995-2014年期间的结果与CONCORD研究报告的以下位置的结果进行比较:胃(C16)、乳腺(C50)、宫颈(C53)、前列腺(C61),结果:截至2007年,乳腺癌和前列腺癌的五年生存率估计值提高了10个百分点(乳腺癌为70.8至81.1,前列腺癌为79.9至90.2),并在2008-2017年保持稳定。癌症宫颈癌的存活率在过去二十年中一直稳定在53%。对于癌症和癌症,在研究期间,五年NS低于25%。对于癌症,存活率估计从1998-2002年的37.9%增加到2013-2017年的54.8%。与之前对2010-2014年确诊病例的5年生存率估计相比,本研究中的估计值明显高于CONCORD获得的估计值。1995-2009年确诊患者的生存率估计值与CONCORD研究结果无差异。结论:定期更新生命状态和最后一次接触的日期减少了被动随访的癌症人群登记中生存率估计的偏差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1