Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Receiving Thromboprophylaxis.

IF 1.3 Q4 HEMATOLOGY Journal of hematology Pub Date : 2022-10-01 Epub Date: 2022-10-31 DOI:10.14740/jh1036
Jimmy Huang, Jenny Martinez, Daniel Diaz, William R Wolowich
{"title":"Incidence of Venous Thromboembolism in Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients Receiving Thromboprophylaxis.","authors":"Jimmy Huang,&nbsp;Jenny Martinez,&nbsp;Daniel Diaz,&nbsp;William R Wolowich","doi":"10.14740/jh1036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between anticoagulant dosing intensity in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infected patients and its outcomes on venous thromboembolism (VTE) and all-cause mortality.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective observational study that examined different anticoagulation regimens among COVID-19 patients for prophylaxis of VTE. Primary outcomes of the study were VTE incidence and all-cause mortality for patients receiving prophylaxis-intensity (PPX) and therapeutic-intensity (TX) anticoagulation. Secondary outcomes were incidence of hemorrhagic events and hospital length of stay. Patients were matched (1:1) based on age and Charlson comorbidity score. Sub-group analyses evaluated outcomes within critically ill patients, between specific anticoagulant agents and comorbid conditions.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The primary outcome of VTE occurred in six patients within the prophylactic dose group and eight patients in the therapeutic-intensity dose group (risk ratio (RR): 2.02 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7 - 5.2); P = 0.2). Bleeding occurred in 15 (11%) patients in the prophylactic group and 27 (19%) patients in the therapeutic group (RR: 0.5 (95% CI: 0.3 - 1.0); P < 0.049). Hospital length of stay was shorter by 4 days in those treated with prophylactic-intensity anticoagulation (P = 0.003). Intensive care unit admission and ventilation were negatively correlated with mortality in a multivariate analysis.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, the use of therapeutic-intensity anticoagulation did not show any benefits in reducing the occurrence of VTE. An increase in mortality and in the incidence of hemorrhagic events was statistically significant in the therapeutic-intensity group. Future prospective studies are warranted to evaluate anticoagulation therapy in COVID-19 infected patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":15964,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hematology","volume":"11 5","pages":"167-175"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/3a/77/jh-11-167.PMC9635799.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hematology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jh1036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/10/31 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to investigate the association between anticoagulant dosing intensity in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infected patients and its outcomes on venous thromboembolism (VTE) and all-cause mortality.

Methods: This is a retrospective observational study that examined different anticoagulation regimens among COVID-19 patients for prophylaxis of VTE. Primary outcomes of the study were VTE incidence and all-cause mortality for patients receiving prophylaxis-intensity (PPX) and therapeutic-intensity (TX) anticoagulation. Secondary outcomes were incidence of hemorrhagic events and hospital length of stay. Patients were matched (1:1) based on age and Charlson comorbidity score. Sub-group analyses evaluated outcomes within critically ill patients, between specific anticoagulant agents and comorbid conditions.

Results: The primary outcome of VTE occurred in six patients within the prophylactic dose group and eight patients in the therapeutic-intensity dose group (risk ratio (RR): 2.02 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.7 - 5.2); P = 0.2). Bleeding occurred in 15 (11%) patients in the prophylactic group and 27 (19%) patients in the therapeutic group (RR: 0.5 (95% CI: 0.3 - 1.0); P < 0.049). Hospital length of stay was shorter by 4 days in those treated with prophylactic-intensity anticoagulation (P = 0.003). Intensive care unit admission and ventilation were negatively correlated with mortality in a multivariate analysis.

Conclusions: Among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, the use of therapeutic-intensity anticoagulation did not show any benefits in reducing the occurrence of VTE. An increase in mortality and in the incidence of hemorrhagic events was statistically significant in the therapeutic-intensity group. Future prospective studies are warranted to evaluate anticoagulation therapy in COVID-19 infected patients.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
住院接受血栓预防治疗的COVID-19患者静脉血栓栓塞的发生率
背景:本研究的目的是探讨2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)感染患者抗凝血剂剂量与静脉血栓栓塞(VTE)结局和全因死亡率的关系。方法:这是一项回顾性观察性研究,研究了COVID-19患者不同抗凝治疗方案对静脉血栓栓塞的预防作用。该研究的主要结果是接受预防强度(PPX)和治疗强度(TX)抗凝治疗的患者的静脉血栓栓塞发生率和全因死亡率。次要结局是出血性事件的发生率和住院时间。根据年龄和Charlson合并症评分对患者进行1:1的匹配。亚组分析评估了危重患者在特定抗凝药物和合并症之间的结果。结果:预防剂量组有6例患者发生静脉血栓栓塞,治疗强度剂量组有8例患者发生静脉血栓栓塞(风险比(RR): 2.02(95%可信区间(CI): 0.7 ~ 5.2);P = 0.2)。预防组15例(11%)患者出血,治疗组27例(19%)患者出血(RR: 0.5 (95% CI: 0.3 - 1.0);P < 0.049)。预防性强效抗凝治疗组住院时间缩短4天(P = 0.003)。在多变量分析中,重症监护病房入住和通气与死亡率呈负相关。结论:在住院的COVID-19患者中,使用治疗性强度抗凝治疗在减少静脉血栓栓塞发生方面没有任何益处。在治疗强度组,死亡率和出血事件发生率的增加具有统计学意义。未来的前瞻性研究有必要评估COVID-19感染患者的抗凝治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of hematology
Journal of hematology HEMATOLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
期刊最新文献
A Case of Fulminant Cerebral Edema Leading to Death After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy. Methionine Synthase Reductase A66G Variant in Pediatric Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia Patients. Optimizing Falling Drop Hemoglobin Method by Comparing Capillary Versus Venous Blood and Determining the Stability of the Copper Sulfate Solution. Retrospective Study of CD20 Expression Loss in Relapsed or Refractory B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma. Sequential Use of Prednisolone and Cyclosporine Is Effective in the Management of Immunotherapy-Related Hemolytic Anemia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1