Retention Evaluation of Fissure Sealants Applied Using Self-Etch and Conventional Acid-Etch Techniques: A Randomized Control Trial Among Schoolchildren.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Pediatric dentistry Pub Date : 2022-07-15
Yazeed Magbul Althomali, Sabri Musa, Nor Malina Manan, Nor Azlida Mohd Nor
{"title":"Retention Evaluation of Fissure Sealants Applied Using Self-Etch and Conventional Acid-Etch Techniques: A Randomized Control Trial Among Schoolchildren.","authors":"Yazeed Magbul Althomali, Sabri Musa, Nor Malina Manan, Nor Azlida Mohd Nor","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Purpose:</b> The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical retention capabilities of a self-etch adhesive system (experimental group) and conventional acid-etch (control group) techniques and compare the caries incidence within six months and 24 months of follow-up periods. <b>Methods:</b> A total of 47 healthy children with a mean age of 9.7 years and either sound or noncavitated erupted permanent first molars were included in the trial. A total of 188 molars were randomly assigned in a split-mouth design for the self-etch mode in the universal adhesive or conventional acid-etch. Differences in sealant retention and caries incidence were compared at six and 24 months after sealant placement using a chi-square test. <b>Results:</b> Within 24 months of follow-up, the retention of fissure sealant applied using conventional acid etching (41 out of 66; 62.1 percent) was significantly higher (P<0.05) than that of the fissure sealant applied using self-etching mode in the universal adhesive system (17 out of 66; 25.8 percent). There was no significant difference in caries incidence between the two groups up to 24 months after sealant placement. <b>Conclusion:</b> With 24 months of follow-up, the retention of the conventional acid-etching technique were superior to those of the self-etch technique.</p>","PeriodicalId":19863,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric dentistry","volume":"44 4","pages":"249-254"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the clinical retention capabilities of a self-etch adhesive system (experimental group) and conventional acid-etch (control group) techniques and compare the caries incidence within six months and 24 months of follow-up periods. Methods: A total of 47 healthy children with a mean age of 9.7 years and either sound or noncavitated erupted permanent first molars were included in the trial. A total of 188 molars were randomly assigned in a split-mouth design for the self-etch mode in the universal adhesive or conventional acid-etch. Differences in sealant retention and caries incidence were compared at six and 24 months after sealant placement using a chi-square test. Results: Within 24 months of follow-up, the retention of fissure sealant applied using conventional acid etching (41 out of 66; 62.1 percent) was significantly higher (P<0.05) than that of the fissure sealant applied using self-etching mode in the universal adhesive system (17 out of 66; 25.8 percent). There was no significant difference in caries incidence between the two groups up to 24 months after sealant placement. Conclusion: With 24 months of follow-up, the retention of the conventional acid-etching technique were superior to those of the self-etch technique.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用自酸蚀技术和传统酸蚀技术进行的裂隙封闭剂保持力评估:学龄儿童随机对照试验。
目的:本研究旨在评估自酸蚀粘接系统(实验组)和传统酸蚀技术(对照组)的临床保持能力,并比较 6 个月和 24 个月随访期内的龋齿发生率。实验方法共有 47 名平均年龄为 9.7 岁、萌出的第一恒磨牙健全或未龋坏的健康儿童参与试验。在分口设计中,共有 188 颗磨牙被随机分配到通用粘接剂自酸蚀模式或传统酸蚀模式中。采用卡方检验比较了封闭剂放置后 6 个月和 24 个月封闭剂保持率和龋齿发生率的差异。结果显示在24个月的随访中,传统酸蚀技术的保持率优于自酸蚀技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric dentistry
Pediatric dentistry DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINEPEDIATRI-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
6.20%
发文量
74
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Dentistry is the official publication of the American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry, the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry and the College of Diplomates of the American Board of Pediatric Dentistry. It is published bi-monthly and is internationally recognized as the leading journal in the area of pediatric dentistry. The journal promotes the practice, education and research specifically related to the specialty of pediatric dentistry. This peer-reviewed journal features scientific articles, case reports and abstracts of current pediatric dental research.
期刊最新文献
A Randomized Clinical Trial of Short Fiber Reinforced Composite and Glass Hybrid Restoration for Molars Affected by Molar Hypomineralization. Oral Health in the Down Syndrome Population: Parental Perceptions on Dental Care in the United States. Early Introduction of Total Sugar Foods and Early Childhood Caries. Articaine Infiltration Versus Lidocaine Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block for Primary Mandibular Molars: A Double-blind Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. Pre-, Peri-, and Postnatal Risk for the Development of Enamel Defects in Permanent Dentition: A Birth Cohort in Southern Brazil.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1