Ethical aspects in the management of the terminally ill patient in the pediatric intensive care unit.

Revista do Hospital das Clinicas Pub Date : 2004-01-01 Epub Date: 2004-03-15 DOI:10.1590/s0041-87812004000100002
Lara de Araújo Torreão, Crésio Romeu Pereira, Eduardo Troster
{"title":"Ethical aspects in the management of the terminally ill patient in the pediatric intensive care unit.","authors":"Lara de Araújo Torreão,&nbsp;Crésio Romeu Pereira,&nbsp;Eduardo Troster","doi":"10.1590/s0041-87812004000100002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To identify the prevalence of management plans and decision-making processes for terminal care patients in pediatric intensive care units.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Evidence-based medicine was done by a systematic review using an electronic data base (LILACS, 1982 through 2000) and (MEDLINE, 1966 through 2000). The key words used are listed and age limits (0 to 18 years) were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eighty two articles were found and after selection according to the exclusion/inclusion criteria and objectives 17 relevant papers were identified. The most common decisions found were do-not-resuscitation orders and withdrawal or withholding life support care. The justifications for these were \"imminent death\" and \"unsatisfatory quality of life\".</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Care management was based on ethical principles aiming at improving benefits, avoiding harm, and when possible, respecting the autonomy of the terminally ill patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":76453,"journal":{"name":"Revista do Hospital das Clinicas","volume":"59 1","pages":"3-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista do Hospital das Clinicas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s0041-87812004000100002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2004/3/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

Objective: To identify the prevalence of management plans and decision-making processes for terminal care patients in pediatric intensive care units.

Methodology: Evidence-based medicine was done by a systematic review using an electronic data base (LILACS, 1982 through 2000) and (MEDLINE, 1966 through 2000). The key words used are listed and age limits (0 to 18 years) were used.

Results: One hundred and eighty two articles were found and after selection according to the exclusion/inclusion criteria and objectives 17 relevant papers were identified. The most common decisions found were do-not-resuscitation orders and withdrawal or withholding life support care. The justifications for these were "imminent death" and "unsatisfatory quality of life".

Conclusion: Care management was based on ethical principles aiming at improving benefits, avoiding harm, and when possible, respecting the autonomy of the terminally ill patient.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
儿科重症监护病房临终病人管理中的伦理问题。
目的:了解儿科重症监护病房临终病人管理计划和决策过程的流行情况。方法:循证医学通过使用电子数据库(LILACS, 1982 - 2000)和(MEDLINE, 1966 - 2000)进行系统评价。列出了使用的关键词,并使用了年龄限制(0至18岁)。结果:共纳入182篇文献,根据排除/纳入标准和目的进行筛选后,共筛选出17篇相关文献。发现最常见的决定是不复苏命令和撤回或停止生命支持护理。这些理由是“即将死亡”和“生活质量不令人满意”。结论:临终关怀管理应遵循伦理原则,以提高临终病人的利益,避免伤害,并在可能的情况下尊重临终病人的自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Fetal programming and future disease. Retrospective evaluation of bone pain palliation after samarium-153-EDTMP therapy. Hypertension in employees of a University General Hospital. Adverse life events and coping skills in panic disorder. Human identification and analysis of DNA in bones.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1