Transcoronary sinus administration of autologous bone marrow in patients with chronic refractory stable angina

J. Vicario , C. Campos , J. Piva , F. Faccio , L. Gerardo , C. Becker , H.H. Ortega , A. Pierini , C. Lofeudo , R. Novero , A. Licheri , R. Milesi , N. Perez Baliño , A. Monti , A. Amin , H. Pfeiffer , E. De Giovanni , I. Fendrich
{"title":"Transcoronary sinus administration of autologous bone marrow in patients with chronic refractory stable angina","authors":"J. Vicario ,&nbsp;C. Campos ,&nbsp;J. Piva ,&nbsp;F. Faccio ,&nbsp;L. Gerardo ,&nbsp;C. Becker ,&nbsp;H.H. Ortega ,&nbsp;A. Pierini ,&nbsp;C. Lofeudo ,&nbsp;R. Novero ,&nbsp;A. Licheri ,&nbsp;R. Milesi ,&nbsp;N. Perez Baliño ,&nbsp;A. Monti ,&nbsp;A. Amin ,&nbsp;H. Pfeiffer ,&nbsp;E. De Giovanni ,&nbsp;I. Fendrich","doi":"10.1016/j.carrad.2004.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>Based on our preclinic studies with autologous unfractionated bone marrow (AUBM) via coronary sinus with transitory occlusion, a clinic study in patients with chronic stable angina was designed. The objectives were to evaluate safety, tolerance and feasibility.</p></div><div><h3>Methods and materials</h3><p>A multicenter prospective study with inclusion and exclusion criteria defined by an Independent Clinical Committee was carried out. Fourteen patients underwent transcoronary sinus administration of freshly aspirated and filtered AUBM (60–120 ml). Safety and tolerance were evaluated. Feasibility was evaluated with Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina classification (baseline–Day 180), myocardial perfusion (baseline–Day 90) with independent core laboratory and coronary angiography (baseline and Day 30).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>There were no changes in the safety and tolerance parameters. Preliminary clinical efficacy at Day 180 disclosed a significant improvement of 38%, evaluated by the SAQ. The CCS angina classification shows that the mean angina class was 3.0±0.55 at baseline and improved to 2.0±0.00 at Day 180 (<em>P</em>&lt;.001). Semiquantitative radionuclide perfusion imaging (core lab) showed a significant improvement at Day 90 in 13/14 patients, with a mean improvement of 24% at rest (<em>P</em>&lt;.01) and 33% at stress (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). Coronary angiography showed more collateral vessels in 9/14 patients.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>We can conclude that AUBM via coronary sinus with transitory occlusion is tolerable and safe. Significant improvement in the myocardial perfusion at Day 90 and in the quality of life at Day 180 was observed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":80261,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular radiation medicine","volume":"5 2","pages":"Pages 71-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.carrad.2004.06.004","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular radiation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1522186504000514","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Purpose

Based on our preclinic studies with autologous unfractionated bone marrow (AUBM) via coronary sinus with transitory occlusion, a clinic study in patients with chronic stable angina was designed. The objectives were to evaluate safety, tolerance and feasibility.

Methods and materials

A multicenter prospective study with inclusion and exclusion criteria defined by an Independent Clinical Committee was carried out. Fourteen patients underwent transcoronary sinus administration of freshly aspirated and filtered AUBM (60–120 ml). Safety and tolerance were evaluated. Feasibility was evaluated with Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ), Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) angina classification (baseline–Day 180), myocardial perfusion (baseline–Day 90) with independent core laboratory and coronary angiography (baseline and Day 30).

Results

There were no changes in the safety and tolerance parameters. Preliminary clinical efficacy at Day 180 disclosed a significant improvement of 38%, evaluated by the SAQ. The CCS angina classification shows that the mean angina class was 3.0±0.55 at baseline and improved to 2.0±0.00 at Day 180 (P<.001). Semiquantitative radionuclide perfusion imaging (core lab) showed a significant improvement at Day 90 in 13/14 patients, with a mean improvement of 24% at rest (P<.01) and 33% at stress (P<.05). Coronary angiography showed more collateral vessels in 9/14 patients.

Conclusions

We can conclude that AUBM via coronary sinus with transitory occlusion is tolerable and safe. Significant improvement in the myocardial perfusion at Day 90 and in the quality of life at Day 180 was observed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经冠状窦给药自体骨髓治疗慢性难治性稳定型心绞痛
目的基于经冠状动脉窦短暂性阻断的自体未分割骨髓(AUBM)临床前研究,设计慢性稳定型心绞痛患者的临床研究。目的是评估安全性、耐受性和可行性。方法和材料采用独立临床委员会制定的纳入和排除标准进行多中心前瞻性研究。14例患者接受经冠状窦给药,新鲜吸入和过滤的AUBM (60-120 ml)。评估了安全性和耐受性。采用西雅图心绞痛问卷(SAQ)、加拿大心血管学会(CCS)心绞痛分类(基线- 180天)、独立核心实验室心肌灌注(基线- 90天)和冠状动脉造影(基线和30天)评估可行性。结果两组药物的安全性和耐受性参数均无变化。根据SAQ的评估,第180天的初步临床疗效显着改善了38%。CCS心绞痛分级显示,基线时平均心绞痛分级为3.0±0.55,第180天改善为2.0±0.00 (P<.001)。半定量放射性核素灌注成像(core lab)显示13/14例患者在第90天有显著改善,静息时平均改善24% (P< 0.01),应激时平均改善33% (P< 0.05)。冠状动脉造影显示9/14患者侧支血管增多。结论经冠状窦短暂闭塞行AUBM是安全、可耐受的。观察到第90天心肌灌注显著改善,第180天生活质量显著改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Abstracts No change in endothelial-dependent vasomotion late after coronary irradiation Clinical and angiographic outcomes of cardiac transplant patients treated with intracoronary beta-radiation for in-stent restenosis Brachytherapy with gamma radiation of a coronary artery for in-stent restenosis may induce the regression of in-stent restenosis of an adjacent coronary artery without angioplasty. First case report and review of the literature Endovascular treatment of peripheral vascular disease: before or after coronary surgery?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1