Subject-specific model estimation of cardiac output and blood volume during hemorrhage.

Maxwell Lewis Neal, James B Bassingthwaighte
{"title":"Subject-specific model estimation of cardiac output and blood volume during hemorrhage.","authors":"Maxwell Lewis Neal,&nbsp;James B Bassingthwaighte","doi":"10.1007/s10558-007-9035-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We have developed a novel method for estimating subject-specific hemodynamics during hemorrhage. First, a mathematical model representing a closed-loop circulation and baroreceptor feedback system was parameterized to match the baseline physiology of individual experimental subjects by fitting model results to 1 min of pre-injury data. This automated parameterization process matched pre-injury measurements within 1.4 +/- 1.3% SD. Tuned parameters were then used in similar open-loop models to simulate dynamics post-injury. Cardiac output (CO) estimates were obtained continuously using post-injury measurements of arterial blood pressure (ABP) and heart rate (HR) as inputs to the first open-loop model. Secondarily, total blood volume (TBV) estimates were obtained by summing the blood volumes in all the circulatory segments of a second open-loop model that used measured CO as an additional input. We validated the estimation method by comparing model CO results to flowprobe measurements in 14 pigs. Overall, CO estimates had a Bland-Altman bias of -0.30 l/min with upper and lower limits of agreement 0.80 and -1.40 l/min. The negative bias is likely due to overestimation of the peripheral resistance response to hemorrhage. There was no reference measurement of TBV; however, the estimates appeared reasonable and clearly predicted survival versus death during the post-hemorrhage period. Both open-loop models ran in real time on a computer with a 2.4 GHz processor, and their clinical applicability in emergency care scenarios is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":55275,"journal":{"name":"Cardiovascular Engineering (dordrecht, Netherlands)","volume":" ","pages":"97-120"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1007/s10558-007-9035-7","citationCount":"48","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cardiovascular Engineering (dordrecht, Netherlands)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10558-007-9035-7","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

Abstract

We have developed a novel method for estimating subject-specific hemodynamics during hemorrhage. First, a mathematical model representing a closed-loop circulation and baroreceptor feedback system was parameterized to match the baseline physiology of individual experimental subjects by fitting model results to 1 min of pre-injury data. This automated parameterization process matched pre-injury measurements within 1.4 +/- 1.3% SD. Tuned parameters were then used in similar open-loop models to simulate dynamics post-injury. Cardiac output (CO) estimates were obtained continuously using post-injury measurements of arterial blood pressure (ABP) and heart rate (HR) as inputs to the first open-loop model. Secondarily, total blood volume (TBV) estimates were obtained by summing the blood volumes in all the circulatory segments of a second open-loop model that used measured CO as an additional input. We validated the estimation method by comparing model CO results to flowprobe measurements in 14 pigs. Overall, CO estimates had a Bland-Altman bias of -0.30 l/min with upper and lower limits of agreement 0.80 and -1.40 l/min. The negative bias is likely due to overestimation of the peripheral resistance response to hemorrhage. There was no reference measurement of TBV; however, the estimates appeared reasonable and clearly predicted survival versus death during the post-hemorrhage period. Both open-loop models ran in real time on a computer with a 2.4 GHz processor, and their clinical applicability in emergency care scenarios is discussed.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
出血时心输出量和血容量的受试者特异性模型估计。
我们已经开发了一种新的方法来估计出血期间的受试者特异性血流动力学。首先,通过将模型结果拟合到损伤前1分钟的数据,将一个代表闭环循环和压力感受器反馈系统的数学模型参数化,以匹配个体实验对象的基线生理。该自动化参数化过程与损伤前测量结果的SD值在1.4 +/- 1.3%内匹配。然后在类似的开环模型中使用调整后的参数来模拟损伤后的动力学。心输出量(CO)的估计连续使用损伤后测量的动脉血压(ABP)和心率(HR)作为第一个开环模型的输入。其次,总血容量(TBV)估计值是通过将第二个开环模型中所有循环段的血容量相加得到的,该模型使用测量的CO作为附加输入。通过将模型CO结果与14头猪的流量探头测量结果进行比较,验证了估算方法。总体而言,CO估计的Bland-Altman偏差为-0.30 l/min,上限和下限分别为0.80和-1.40 l/min。负偏倚可能是由于高估了外周对出血的抵抗反应。没有TBV的参考测量;然而,这些估计似乎是合理的,并清楚地预测了出血后期间的生存与死亡。两种开环模型在2.4 GHz处理器的计算机上实时运行,并讨论了它们在急诊护理场景中的临床适用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
3D Bioprinting of a Tissue Engineered Human Heart Tissue-Mimicking Materials for Cardiac Imaging Phantom—Section 2: From Fabrication to Optimization Square Root Design for Natural Frequency Module of Dynamic ECG Features—a Preliminary Study Tissue-Mimicking Materials for Cardiac Imaging Phantom—Section 1: From Conception to Materials Selection Biopolymers as Potential Carrier for Effervescent Reaction Based Drug Delivery System in Gastrointestinal Condition
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1