Child Only Kinship Care Cases:The Unintended Consequences of TANF Policies for Families Who Have Health Problems and Disabilities.

Ruby M Gourdine
{"title":"Child Only Kinship Care Cases:The Unintended Consequences of TANF Policies for Families Who Have Health Problems and Disabilities.","authors":"Ruby M Gourdine","doi":"10.1300/j045v22n03_04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The passage of the Personal Responsibility Work Opportunities Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) in 1996 changed the way America sought to help its most vulnerable citizens. The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) legislation required families to work first. Many families with young children found the stringent requirements of TANF too restrictive for their needs. In this study a number of TANF customers were either physically ill or suffered mental health problems thus preventing them from finding suitable employment. Additionally they may have children who have health problems, which preclude the parent from work activity. Faced with time limits these families may rely on relatives or fictive kin to assume the responsibility of receiving TANF grants for the children so that they may avoid sanctions and possible loss of support for their children. These arrangements are called child-only cases. Given that poverty is related to neglect and neglect may result in out of home placement, these children are at risk for child welfare intervention. Child welfare systems look to kin to assume the responsibility of child rearing to reduce the number of children especially African American children who enter care. However, TANF and informal arrangements for kin to take care of children result in substantially less money for families. An evaluation of TANF is needed to determine if this legislation provides an adequate system for caring for needy families and children. doi:10.1300/J045v22n03_04.</p>","PeriodicalId":73764,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health & social policy","volume":" ","pages":"45-64"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2006-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1300/j045v22n03_04","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health & social policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1300/j045v22n03_04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The passage of the Personal Responsibility Work Opportunities Reconciliation Act (PRWORA) in 1996 changed the way America sought to help its most vulnerable citizens. The Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) legislation required families to work first. Many families with young children found the stringent requirements of TANF too restrictive for their needs. In this study a number of TANF customers were either physically ill or suffered mental health problems thus preventing them from finding suitable employment. Additionally they may have children who have health problems, which preclude the parent from work activity. Faced with time limits these families may rely on relatives or fictive kin to assume the responsibility of receiving TANF grants for the children so that they may avoid sanctions and possible loss of support for their children. These arrangements are called child-only cases. Given that poverty is related to neglect and neglect may result in out of home placement, these children are at risk for child welfare intervention. Child welfare systems look to kin to assume the responsibility of child rearing to reduce the number of children especially African American children who enter care. However, TANF and informal arrangements for kin to take care of children result in substantially less money for families. An evaluation of TANF is needed to determine if this legislation provides an adequate system for caring for needy families and children. doi:10.1300/J045v22n03_04.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
仅儿童亲属关怀案例:有健康问题和残疾家庭的TANF政策的意外后果。
1996年通过的《个人责任与工作机会协调法案》(PRWORA)改变了美国寻求帮助其最弱势公民的方式。《贫困家庭临时援助法》(TANF)要求家庭首先工作。许多有小孩的家庭发现TANF的严格要求对他们的需求限制太大。在这项研究中,许多TANF客户要么身体有病,要么有精神健康问题,因此无法找到合适的工作。此外,他们的子女可能有健康问题,这使父母无法参加工作活动。由于时间限制,这些家庭可能依靠亲戚或实际亲属承担为儿童领取临时援助基金补助金的责任,以便他们可以避免制裁和可能失去对其子女的支持。这些安排被称为仅限儿童的情况。鉴于贫困与忽视有关,而忽视可能导致被安置在家庭外,这些儿童面临儿童福利干预的风险。儿童福利制度希望亲属承担抚养孩子的责任,以减少进入福利院的儿童,特别是非洲裔美国儿童的数量。但是,临时援助基金和亲属照顾儿童的非正式安排导致家庭的收入大大减少。需要对短期援助基金进行评估,以确定这项立法是否为照顾贫困家庭和儿童提供了适当的制度。doi: 10.1300 / J045v22n03_04。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Public knowledge, attitudes, and behavior toward Kansas mandatory seatbelt use: implications for public health policy. Providing Behavioral Incentives for Improved Health in Aging and Medicare Cost Control Acknowledgments Grandfathers raising grandchildren:an exploration of african american kinship networks. TANF policy: past, present, and future directions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1