A new self-report questionnaire called "ABC" to evaluate in a clinical practice the aid perceived from services by relatives, needs and family burden of severe mental illness.

Franco Veltro, Pierluigi Morosini, Antonella Gigantesco, Massimo Casacchia, Rita Roncone, Giuseppe Dell'acqua, Elvira Chiaia, Andrea Balbi, Renzo De Stefani, Giampiero Cesari
{"title":"A new self-report questionnaire called \"ABC\" to evaluate in a clinical practice the aid perceived from services by relatives, needs and family burden of severe mental illness.","authors":"Franco Veltro, Pierluigi Morosini, Antonella Gigantesco, Massimo Casacchia, Rita Roncone, Giuseppe Dell'acqua, Elvira Chiaia, Andrea Balbi, Renzo De Stefani, Giampiero Cesari","doi":"10.1186/1745-0179-3-15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe: a) a self-report questionnaire of 34 item, developed by a Family Association of Psychiatric Patients in collaboration with two psychiatrists to evaluate by key-relative in a clinical practice the perceived quality of mental health services, the needs and family burden; b) the methodology of validation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>It has been studied (a) the Face Validity by two focus groups of 10 relatives for each group, (b) the concurrent validity of family burden items comparing the ABC with QPF, a widely used questionnaire, in 6 Italian mental health centres on a sample of key-relatives, (c) the discriminant validity comparing three different samples of key-relatives of patients with psychiatric illness, Alzheimer or cancer. The internal consistency of items for assessing relatives' opinions on the quality of care has been evaluated by Chronbach' s alpha. The test-retest has been evaluated on a sample of 20 key-relatives.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The results indicate a fairly good performance of the questionnaire in this preliminary but almost complete phase of validation. The time to fill in it has been estimated in a 7 minutes average.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>It is possible by this self-report questionnaire to evaluate in a clinical routine setting and in a very short time three important problems for relatives and professionals: opinions and needs of relatives, and objective and subjective family burden of severe mental illness.</p>","PeriodicalId":35447,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2031885/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-3-15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe: a) a self-report questionnaire of 34 item, developed by a Family Association of Psychiatric Patients in collaboration with two psychiatrists to evaluate by key-relative in a clinical practice the perceived quality of mental health services, the needs and family burden; b) the methodology of validation.

Methods: It has been studied (a) the Face Validity by two focus groups of 10 relatives for each group, (b) the concurrent validity of family burden items comparing the ABC with QPF, a widely used questionnaire, in 6 Italian mental health centres on a sample of key-relatives, (c) the discriminant validity comparing three different samples of key-relatives of patients with psychiatric illness, Alzheimer or cancer. The internal consistency of items for assessing relatives' opinions on the quality of care has been evaluated by Chronbach' s alpha. The test-retest has been evaluated on a sample of 20 key-relatives.

Results: The results indicate a fairly good performance of the questionnaire in this preliminary but almost complete phase of validation. The time to fill in it has been estimated in a 7 minutes average.

Conclusion: It is possible by this self-report questionnaire to evaluate in a clinical routine setting and in a very short time three important problems for relatives and professionals: opinions and needs of relatives, and objective and subjective family burden of severe mental illness.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种名为 "ABC "的新的自我报告问卷,用于在临床实践中评估亲属从服务中感受到的援助、重症精神病患者的需求和家庭负担。
目的描述:a) 由精神病患者家庭协会与两名精神科医生合作开发的 34 个项目的自我报告问卷,用于评估临床实践中关键亲属对心理健康服务质量、需求和家庭负担的感知;b) 验证方法:方法:对以下内容进行了研究:(a)通过两个焦点小组(每组 10 名亲属)进行面效度研究;(b)在意大利 6 家精神健康中心的主要亲属样本中,将 ABC 与 QPF(一种广泛使用的调查问卷)进行比较,研究家庭负担项目的并发效度;(c)对精神病患者、老年痴呆症患者或癌症患者的三个不同主要亲属样本进行比较,研究判别效度。通过 Chronbach's alpha 评估了评估亲属对护理质量意见的项目的内部一致性。对 20 名主要亲属样本进行了重复测试评估:结果表明,问卷在这一初步但几乎完整的验证阶段表现相当不错。填写时间估计平均为 7 分钟:结论:通过这份自我报告问卷,可以在很短的时间内对亲属和专业人员在临床常规环境中面临的三个重要问题进行评估:亲属的意见和需求、重性精神病给家庭带来的客观和主观负担。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health is an open access online journal, which publishes Research articles, Reviews, Letters in all areas of clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health covering the following topics: Clinical and epidemiological research in psychiatry and mental health; diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of mental health conditions; and frequencies and determinants of mental health conditions in the community and the populations at risk; research and economic aspects of psychiatry, with special attention given to manuscripts presenting new results and methods in the area; and clinical epidemiologic investigation of pharmaceutical agents. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, a peer reviewed journal, aims to provide the most complete and reliable source of information on current developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and freely available worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Are Nurses Working in Mental Health in a Time of Changing Approaches More Exposed to Stress than other Professionals? Job Satisfaction and Perception of Respect for the Rights of Users in Seven Different Countries Worldwide. Obsessive-compulsive Symptoms Prevalence among Medical Students in Four Major Universities, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Pharmacogenetic Testing in Treatment-resistant Panic Disorder: a Preliminary Analysis. Exploring Mental Health Issues and Priorities in Indonesia Through Qualitative Expert Consensus. Factors Associated with Stress among Healthcare Personnel after COVID-19 in Northeast Thailand: A Cross-sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1