Effects of a single intratympanic gentamicin injection on Meniere's disease.

Won-Ho Chung, Kyu Whan Chung, Joon Ho Kim, Yang-Sun Cho, Sung Hwa Hong
{"title":"Effects of a single intratympanic gentamicin injection on Meniere's disease.","authors":"Won-Ho Chung,&nbsp;Kyu Whan Chung,&nbsp;Joon Ho Kim,&nbsp;Yang-Sun Cho,&nbsp;Sung Hwa Hong","doi":"10.1080/03655230701624889","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both single and multiple injections of ITGM were effective in vertigo control and functional improvement. However, the risk of sensorineural hearing loss was much lower for a single injection than for multiple injections.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>While intratympanic gentamicin injection (ITGM) has been established as treatment option for intractable Meniere's disease, several injection protocols have been introduced. The risk of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) has been reported to be variable for each protocol. Among the protocols, the single injection protocol is an easy to administer, well-tolerated and cost effective technique, as compared with others. We compared the clinical efficacy of ITGM with regard to the vertigo control rate and the incidence of SNHL between two different protocols: the use of single and multiple injections.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>A retrospective review was conducted for 30 subjects who were treated with ITGM with intractable unilateral Meniere's disease from May 1997 through February 2005. The patients were divided into two groups according to the protocol utilized: the multiple injection group (n =10) and the single injection group (n =20). Treatment efficacy was evaluated by using the AAO-HNS Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines (1995).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Effective vertigo control (Class A and B) were accomplished in 90% of patients in the multiple injection group and in 90% of patients in the single injection group. Functional status was also markedly improved in both groups. However, a significant hearing loss occurred more frequently in the multiple injection group (71%) than in the single injection group (5%). The rate of caloric loss was not different for the two groups (88% for the multiple injection group vs. 85% for the single injection group).</p>","PeriodicalId":7027,"journal":{"name":"Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/03655230701624889","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/03655230701624889","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Conclusion: Both single and multiple injections of ITGM were effective in vertigo control and functional improvement. However, the risk of sensorineural hearing loss was much lower for a single injection than for multiple injections.

Objectives: While intratympanic gentamicin injection (ITGM) has been established as treatment option for intractable Meniere's disease, several injection protocols have been introduced. The risk of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) has been reported to be variable for each protocol. Among the protocols, the single injection protocol is an easy to administer, well-tolerated and cost effective technique, as compared with others. We compared the clinical efficacy of ITGM with regard to the vertigo control rate and the incidence of SNHL between two different protocols: the use of single and multiple injections.

Materials and methods: A retrospective review was conducted for 30 subjects who were treated with ITGM with intractable unilateral Meniere's disease from May 1997 through February 2005. The patients were divided into two groups according to the protocol utilized: the multiple injection group (n =10) and the single injection group (n =20). Treatment efficacy was evaluated by using the AAO-HNS Committee on Hearing and Equilibrium guidelines (1995).

Results: Effective vertigo control (Class A and B) were accomplished in 90% of patients in the multiple injection group and in 90% of patients in the single injection group. Functional status was also markedly improved in both groups. However, a significant hearing loss occurred more frequently in the multiple injection group (71%) than in the single injection group (5%). The rate of caloric loss was not different for the two groups (88% for the multiple injection group vs. 85% for the single injection group).

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单次鼓室内注射庆大霉素对梅尼埃病的影响。
结论:ITGM单次和多次注射均能有效控制眩晕和改善功能。然而,单次注射的感觉神经性听力损失的风险要比多次注射低得多。目的:虽然鼓室内庆大霉素注射(ITGM)已被确定为难治性梅尼埃病的治疗选择,但已经引入了几种注射方案。据报道,每种方案的感音神经性听力损失(SNHL)风险各不相同。与其他方案相比,单次注射方案是一种易于管理,耐受性好且成本有效的技术。我们比较了ITGM在两种不同方案(单次注射和多次注射)的眩晕控制率和SNHL发病率方面的临床疗效。材料和方法:对1997年5月至2005年2月间30例顽固性单侧梅尼埃病患者行ITGM治疗的回顾性研究。根据采用的方案将患者分为两组:多次注射组(n =10)和单次注射组(n =20)。使用AAO-HNS听力和平衡委员会指南(1995年)评估治疗效果。结果:多次注射组和单次注射组分别有90%和90%的患者获得了A、B级眩晕的有效控制。两组患者的功能状况均有明显改善。然而,多次注射组明显的听力损失发生率(71%)高于单次注射组(5%)。两组的热量损失率没有差异(多次注射组为88%,单次注射组为85%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Nasopharyngitis. Towards a consensus on a hearing preservation classification system. A tissue-engineering approach for stenosis of the trachea and/or cricoid. Impacts and limitations of medialization thyroplasty on swallowing function of patients with unilateral vocal fold paralysis. Distribution of bone marrow-derived cells in the vestibular end organs and the endolymphatic sac.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1