Digital radiography: a survey of dentists in Hawai'i.

Hawaii dental journal Pub Date : 2007-07-01
Daniel T Brady
{"title":"Digital radiography: a survey of dentists in Hawai'i.","authors":"Daniel T Brady","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of digital radiography among dentists in Hawai'i and report their experiences using it.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A 20-question survey was developed and used to interview dentists in Hawai'i. Approximately 500 dentists were contacted. The survey asked whether or not the dentist uses digital radiography. For those not using digital equipment, reasons were given as well as proposed future use. For users of digital equipment, further information was requested: group or solo practice, length of time with digital equipment, length of time to decide, brand of dental software, brand and type of digital equipment, how many different systems, satisfaction, would they do it again, financially worth it, advantages, disadvantages, diagnostic or not, use of special features, sensor replacement and maintenance costs, and any other comments about digital radiography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>102 dentists responded to the survey. 36 percent utilize digital radiography. Only 40 percent of nonusers have any inclination of converting to digital, cost being the most common reason not to convert. Average length of time with digital was 3.4 years and about 2 years to make the decision. Dentrix was the most popular software and Dexis the most popular equipment. The overwhelming majority are satisfied with systems, feel they are financially worth it, feel it is diagnostic, and would purchase them again. Advantages included things such as speed, no use of chemicals, and lower radiation. Disadvantages included cost, sensor-related issues, and computer issues. Digital users find special features helpful and utilize them regularly. Maintenance costs include annual software upgrades, sensor replacement, and barriers and bitetabs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Digital radiography is becoming more prevalent in Hawai'i. The big obstacle seems to be cost for most dentists, although users believe it is a good financial investment.</p>","PeriodicalId":77152,"journal":{"name":"Hawaii dental journal","volume":"38 4","pages":"10, 12-3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hawaii dental journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of digital radiography among dentists in Hawai'i and report their experiences using it.

Methods: A 20-question survey was developed and used to interview dentists in Hawai'i. Approximately 500 dentists were contacted. The survey asked whether or not the dentist uses digital radiography. For those not using digital equipment, reasons were given as well as proposed future use. For users of digital equipment, further information was requested: group or solo practice, length of time with digital equipment, length of time to decide, brand of dental software, brand and type of digital equipment, how many different systems, satisfaction, would they do it again, financially worth it, advantages, disadvantages, diagnostic or not, use of special features, sensor replacement and maintenance costs, and any other comments about digital radiography.

Results: 102 dentists responded to the survey. 36 percent utilize digital radiography. Only 40 percent of nonusers have any inclination of converting to digital, cost being the most common reason not to convert. Average length of time with digital was 3.4 years and about 2 years to make the decision. Dentrix was the most popular software and Dexis the most popular equipment. The overwhelming majority are satisfied with systems, feel they are financially worth it, feel it is diagnostic, and would purchase them again. Advantages included things such as speed, no use of chemicals, and lower radiation. Disadvantages included cost, sensor-related issues, and computer issues. Digital users find special features helpful and utilize them regularly. Maintenance costs include annual software upgrades, sensor replacement, and barriers and bitetabs.

Conclusions: Digital radiography is becoming more prevalent in Hawai'i. The big obstacle seems to be cost for most dentists, although users believe it is a good financial investment.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数字放射照相:对夏威夷牙医的调查。
目的:本研究的目的是确定数字放射摄影在夏威夷牙医中的流行程度,并报告他们使用它的经验。方法:采用一份包含20个问题的调查问卷,对夏威夷的牙医进行访谈。我们联系了大约500名牙医。调查询问了牙医是否使用数字放射照相技术。对于那些没有使用数字设备的学生,给出了原因以及未来的使用建议。对于数字设备的用户,要求提供进一步的信息:团体或个人执业,使用数字设备的时间长短,决定的时间长短,牙科软件的品牌,数字设备的品牌和类型,有多少不同的系统,满意度,他们会再做一次,经济上值得,优点,缺点,诊断与否,特殊功能的使用,传感器更换和维护成本,以及关于数字放射照相的任何其他评论。结果:102名牙医回应调查。36%的人使用数字放射照相技术。只有40%的非用户有转换为数字媒体的倾向,成本是不转换的最常见原因。与数字的平均时间为3.4年,做出决定约为2年。Dentrix是最受欢迎的软件,Dexis是最受欢迎的设备。绝大多数人对系统感到满意,觉得它们在经济上是值得的,觉得这是诊断性的,并且会再次购买它们。优点包括速度快,不使用化学物质,辐射低。缺点包括成本、传感器相关问题和计算机问题。数字用户发现特殊功能很有用,并经常使用它们。维护成本包括年度软件升级、传感器更换、屏障和bittab。结论:数字放射照相在夏威夷变得越来越普遍。对大多数牙医来说,最大的障碍似乎是费用,尽管用户认为这是一项很好的经济投资。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Alternative investments. Army dentistry in Hawaii. History of Navy dental care in Hawaii. Dentistry in the Marine Corps. Navy dentistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1