Comparing validity of Edinburgh scale and SRQ20 in screening for post-partum depression.

Iná S Santos, Alicia Matijasevich, Beatriz F Tavares, Andrey C da Cruz Lima, Rafael E Riegel, Bruna C Lopes
{"title":"Comparing validity of Edinburgh scale and SRQ20 in screening for post-partum depression.","authors":"Iná S Santos,&nbsp;Alicia Matijasevich,&nbsp;Beatriz F Tavares,&nbsp;Andrey C da Cruz Lima,&nbsp;Rafael E Riegel,&nbsp;Bruna C Lopes","doi":"10.1186/1745-0179-3-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p> The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is the instrument most used worldwide for screening of Post-Partum Depression (PPD). The SRQ20 questionnaire has been largely used for screening of minor psychiatric disorders. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the two instruments in screening for PPD. At the third-month follow-up home visit to infants of the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort, Southern Brazil, a sub-sample of 378 mothers was selected. Among other questions, EPDS and SRQ20 were applied by trained fieldworkers. Up to 15 days later, a mental health professional re-interviewed the mother (the gold standard interview). Sensitivity and specificity of each cutoff point were calculated for EPDS and SRQ20 and the results were plotted at a ROC curve. The areas under both curves were compared. Highest sensitivity and specificity cutoff were observed for EPDS >/= 10 (sensitivity 82.7%, 95%CI 74.0 - 89.4; specificity 65.3%, 95%CI 59.4 - 71.0) and for SRQ20 >/= 6 (sensitivity 70.5%, 95%CI 60.8 - 79.0%; specificity 75.5%, 95%CI 70.0 - 80.5%). Shape of ROC curves and areas under both curves were virtually identical (respectively, 0.8401 +/- 0.02 for EPDS and 0.8402 +/- 0.02 for SRQ20; p = 0.9). In conclusion SRQ20 showed to be as valid as EPDS as a screening tool for PPD at third month after delivery.</p>","PeriodicalId":35447,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"18"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1745-0179-3-18","citationCount":"42","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-3-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

Abstract

The Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) is the instrument most used worldwide for screening of Post-Partum Depression (PPD). The SRQ20 questionnaire has been largely used for screening of minor psychiatric disorders. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of the two instruments in screening for PPD. At the third-month follow-up home visit to infants of the 2004 Pelotas Birth Cohort, Southern Brazil, a sub-sample of 378 mothers was selected. Among other questions, EPDS and SRQ20 were applied by trained fieldworkers. Up to 15 days later, a mental health professional re-interviewed the mother (the gold standard interview). Sensitivity and specificity of each cutoff point were calculated for EPDS and SRQ20 and the results were plotted at a ROC curve. The areas under both curves were compared. Highest sensitivity and specificity cutoff were observed for EPDS >/= 10 (sensitivity 82.7%, 95%CI 74.0 - 89.4; specificity 65.3%, 95%CI 59.4 - 71.0) and for SRQ20 >/= 6 (sensitivity 70.5%, 95%CI 60.8 - 79.0%; specificity 75.5%, 95%CI 70.0 - 80.5%). Shape of ROC curves and areas under both curves were virtually identical (respectively, 0.8401 +/- 0.02 for EPDS and 0.8402 +/- 0.02 for SRQ20; p = 0.9). In conclusion SRQ20 showed to be as valid as EPDS as a screening tool for PPD at third month after delivery.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
爱丁堡量表与SRQ20筛查产后抑郁的效度比较。
爱丁堡产后抑郁量表(EPDS)是全世界最常用的产后抑郁(PPD)筛查工具。SRQ20问卷主要用于轻度精神疾病的筛查。本研究旨在比较两种仪器在PPD筛查中的准确性。在对2004年巴西南部佩洛塔斯出生队列的婴儿进行第三个月的随访家访时,选择了378名母亲的子样本。在其他问题中,EPDS和SRQ20是由训练有素的现场工作人员应用的。15天后,一位心理健康专家再次对这位母亲进行了采访(黄金标准采访)。计算EPDS和SRQ20各截断点的敏感性和特异性,并绘制ROC曲线。比较两条曲线下的面积。EPDS >/= 10时灵敏度和特异性截止值最高(灵敏度82.7%,95%CI 74.0 ~ 89.4;特异性65.3%,95%CI 59.4 ~ 71.0), SRQ20 >/= 6(敏感性70.5%,95%CI 60.8 ~ 79.0%;特异性75.5%,95%CI 70.0 ~ 80.5%)。ROC曲线形状和曲线下面积基本相同(EPDS为0.8401 +/- 0.02,SRQ20为0.8402 +/- 0.02);P = 0.9)。综上所述,SRQ20作为产后第三个月PPD的筛查工具与EPDS一样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health is an open access online journal, which publishes Research articles, Reviews, Letters in all areas of clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health covering the following topics: Clinical and epidemiological research in psychiatry and mental health; diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of mental health conditions; and frequencies and determinants of mental health conditions in the community and the populations at risk; research and economic aspects of psychiatry, with special attention given to manuscripts presenting new results and methods in the area; and clinical epidemiologic investigation of pharmaceutical agents. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, a peer reviewed journal, aims to provide the most complete and reliable source of information on current developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and freely available worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Are Nurses Working in Mental Health in a Time of Changing Approaches More Exposed to Stress than other Professionals? Job Satisfaction and Perception of Respect for the Rights of Users in Seven Different Countries Worldwide. Obsessive-compulsive Symptoms Prevalence among Medical Students in Four Major Universities, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Pharmacogenetic Testing in Treatment-resistant Panic Disorder: a Preliminary Analysis. Exploring Mental Health Issues and Priorities in Indonesia Through Qualitative Expert Consensus. Factors Associated with Stress among Healthcare Personnel after COVID-19 in Northeast Thailand: A Cross-sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1