Gavels in the nursery: an Appellate Court shuts out parents and physicians from care decisions.

Annals of health law Pub Date : 2007-01-01
Kellie R Lang, Steven Leuthner, Arthur R Derse
{"title":"Gavels in the nursery: an Appellate Court shuts out parents and physicians from care decisions.","authors":"Kellie R Lang,&nbsp;Steven Leuthner,&nbsp;Arthur R Derse","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This article explores a recent Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision in a medical malpractice case and its ramifications regarding Wisconsin's informed consent statute. The authors compare and contrast this decision with previous Wisconsin Supreme Court cases and consider the relevance of applicable federal law. The article presents a thoughtful analysis of how the Wisconsin Court of Appeals should have approached the issue, as well as how it created potential conflicts regarding the ethical duties of healthcare providers treating children.</p>","PeriodicalId":79788,"journal":{"name":"Annals of health law","volume":"16 2","pages":"263-90, table of content"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of health law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article explores a recent Wisconsin Court of Appeals decision in a medical malpractice case and its ramifications regarding Wisconsin's informed consent statute. The authors compare and contrast this decision with previous Wisconsin Supreme Court cases and consider the relevance of applicable federal law. The article presents a thoughtful analysis of how the Wisconsin Court of Appeals should have approached the issue, as well as how it created potential conflicts regarding the ethical duties of healthcare providers treating children.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
托儿所的小槌:上诉法院将父母和医生排除在护理决定之外。
本文探讨了最近威斯康星州上诉法院在医疗事故案件中的决定及其对威斯康星州知情同意法规的影响。作者将这一决定与威斯康星州最高法院以前的案件进行比较和对比,并考虑适用联邦法律的相关性。这篇文章对威斯康星州上诉法院应该如何处理这个问题进行了深思熟虑的分析,以及它如何在医疗保健提供者对待儿童的道德义务方面产生了潜在的冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Financial conflicts of interest in science. Beyond "safe and effective": the role of the federal government in supporting and disseminating comparative-effectiveness research. Putting together the pieces: recent proposals to fill in the genetic testing regulatory puzzle. Options for state and local governments to regulate non-cigarette tobacco products. Prescription data mining, medical privacy and the First Amendment: the U.S. Supreme Court in Sorrell v. IMS health Inc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1