The effect of talo-crural joint manipulation on range of motion at the ankle joint in subjects with a history of ankle injury.

Skye Andersen, Gary A Fryer, Patrick McLaughlin
{"title":"The effect of talo-crural joint manipulation on range of motion at the ankle joint in subjects with a history of ankle injury.","authors":"Skye Andersen,&nbsp;Gary A Fryer,&nbsp;Patrick McLaughlin","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction: There is little research available on the effects of peripheral joint manipulation. Only a few studies have examined the effect of manipulation on ankle range of motion, with conflicting results. This study aimed to determine whether a single high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust manipulation to the talo-crural joint altered ankle range of motion in subjects with a history of lateral ligament sprain.Methods: Male and female volunteers (N=52) with a history of lateral ligament sprain were randomly assigned into either an experimental group (n=26) or a control group (n=26). Those in the experimental group received a single HVLA thrust to the talo-crural joint, whilst those in the control group received no treatment intervention. Pre-test and post-test measurements of passive dorsiflexion range of motion were taken.Results: No significant changes in dorsiflexion range of motion were detected between manipulated ankles and those of control subjects using dependent and independent t-tests. Ankles that cavitated displayed a greater mean DFR and large effect size (d=0.8) compared to those that did not gap and cavitate, but analysis with ANOVA revealed these differences to be not significant.Conclusion: HVLA manipulation of the ankle did not increase dorsiflexion range of motion in subjects with a history of lateral ligament sprain.</p>","PeriodicalId":93829,"journal":{"name":"Australasian chiropractic & osteopathy : journal of the Chiropractic & Osteopathic College of Australasia","volume":"11 2","pages":"57-62"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2051316/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian chiropractic & osteopathy : journal of the Chiropractic & Osteopathic College of Australasia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There is little research available on the effects of peripheral joint manipulation. Only a few studies have examined the effect of manipulation on ankle range of motion, with conflicting results. This study aimed to determine whether a single high-velocity, low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust manipulation to the talo-crural joint altered ankle range of motion in subjects with a history of lateral ligament sprain.Methods: Male and female volunteers (N=52) with a history of lateral ligament sprain were randomly assigned into either an experimental group (n=26) or a control group (n=26). Those in the experimental group received a single HVLA thrust to the talo-crural joint, whilst those in the control group received no treatment intervention. Pre-test and post-test measurements of passive dorsiflexion range of motion were taken.Results: No significant changes in dorsiflexion range of motion were detected between manipulated ankles and those of control subjects using dependent and independent t-tests. Ankles that cavitated displayed a greater mean DFR and large effect size (d=0.8) compared to those that did not gap and cavitate, but analysis with ANOVA revealed these differences to be not significant.Conclusion: HVLA manipulation of the ankle did not increase dorsiflexion range of motion in subjects with a history of lateral ligament sprain.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
距脚关节手法对有踝关节损伤史受试者踝关节活动度的影响。
关于外周关节操作影响的研究很少。只有少数研究调查了操纵对踝关节活动范围的影响,结果相互矛盾。本研究旨在确定一个单一的高速,低振幅(HVLA)推力操作的距脚关节是否改变踝关节的活动范围,受试者有外侧韧带扭伤的历史。方法:52例有侧韧带扭伤病史的男性和女性志愿者随机分为实验组(N= 26)和对照组(N= 26)。实验组接受单次HVLA推力到距脚关节,而对照组不接受任何治疗干预。测试前和测试后测量被动背屈运动范围。结果:通过独立t检验和依赖t检验,在操纵踝关节和对照组之间没有发现明显的背屈运动范围变化。与没有间隙和空化的踝关节相比,空化的踝关节显示出更高的平均DFR和更大的效应量(d=0.8),但方差分析显示这些差异并不显著。结论:HVLA手法对有侧韧带扭伤史的受试者并没有增加背屈活动范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Searching for the evidence: a practical guide to some online databases in chiropractic and osteopathy. A clinical model for the diagnosis and management of patients with cervical spine syndromes. Spinal musculoskeletal injuries associated with swimming: a discussion of technique. Spine cancer: a summary and review. Risk management for chiropractors and osteopaths: informed consent. A common law requirement.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1