Add-on quetiapine in the treatment of major depressive disorder in elderly patients with cerebrovascular damage.

Mauro Giovanni Carta, Fausta Zairo, Gisa Mellino, Maria Carolina Hardoy
{"title":"Add-on quetiapine in the treatment of major depressive disorder in elderly patients with cerebrovascular damage.","authors":"Mauro Giovanni Carta,&nbsp;Fausta Zairo,&nbsp;Gisa Mellino,&nbsp;Maria Carolina Hardoy","doi":"10.1186/1745-0179-3-28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Depressive episodes in elderly patients with cerebrovascular damage are characterized by poor responses to standard antidepressants. Recent reports have suggested that the atypical antipsychotic, quetiapine may have antidepressant properties and, in mice, may prevents memory impairment and hippocampus neurodegeneration induced by global cerebral ischemia.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To evaluate the efficacy of combination therapy with quetiapine in depressed elderly patients with cerebrovascular damage.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>An open-label, 6-month follow-up study of patients with major depressive disorder (DSM-IV) and cerebral abnormalities (assessed by MRI) without severe cognitive impairment. Patients who had not responded to standard antidepressants (months of treatment 6.5 +/- 7.2) additionally received quetiapine (300 +/- 111 mg/d). Patients were evaluated at baseline (t0) and Months 1, 3, and 6 (t1, t3, t6) using the Clinical Global Impressions Scale for Severity (CGI-S) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nine patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 72.8 +/- 9.4 years. CGI-S scores decreased from baseline to Month 6: 5.8 +/- 0.7 (t0), 5.4 +/- 0.7 (t1), 5.0 +/- 0.8 (t3), and 4.5 +/- 1.0 (t6), with a significant improvement at 6 months compared with baseline (P = 0.006). A significant improvement over the 6-month period was also observed with HAM-D scores (t0 = 27.2 +/- 4.0, t6 = 14.8 +/- 3.8, P < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this study, quetiapine was efficacious as combination therapy in depressed elderly patients with cerebrovascular damage. The promising results from this study warrant confirmation in large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":35447,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":"28"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1745-0179-3-28","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1745-0179-3-28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: Depressive episodes in elderly patients with cerebrovascular damage are characterized by poor responses to standard antidepressants. Recent reports have suggested that the atypical antipsychotic, quetiapine may have antidepressant properties and, in mice, may prevents memory impairment and hippocampus neurodegeneration induced by global cerebral ischemia.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of combination therapy with quetiapine in depressed elderly patients with cerebrovascular damage.

Methods: An open-label, 6-month follow-up study of patients with major depressive disorder (DSM-IV) and cerebral abnormalities (assessed by MRI) without severe cognitive impairment. Patients who had not responded to standard antidepressants (months of treatment 6.5 +/- 7.2) additionally received quetiapine (300 +/- 111 mg/d). Patients were evaluated at baseline (t0) and Months 1, 3, and 6 (t1, t3, t6) using the Clinical Global Impressions Scale for Severity (CGI-S) and the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAM-D).

Results: Nine patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 72.8 +/- 9.4 years. CGI-S scores decreased from baseline to Month 6: 5.8 +/- 0.7 (t0), 5.4 +/- 0.7 (t1), 5.0 +/- 0.8 (t3), and 4.5 +/- 1.0 (t6), with a significant improvement at 6 months compared with baseline (P = 0.006). A significant improvement over the 6-month period was also observed with HAM-D scores (t0 = 27.2 +/- 4.0, t6 = 14.8 +/- 3.8, P < 0.001).

Conclusion: In this study, quetiapine was efficacious as combination therapy in depressed elderly patients with cerebrovascular damage. The promising results from this study warrant confirmation in large, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
加用喹硫平治疗老年脑血管损伤患者重度抑郁症。
背景:老年脑血管损伤患者抑郁发作的特点是对标准抗抑郁药反应差。最近的报道表明,非典型抗精神病药喹硫平可能具有抗抑郁特性,并且在小鼠中可以预防全脑缺血引起的记忆障碍和海马神经变性。目的:评价喹硫平联合治疗老年抑郁症合并脑血管损伤的疗效。方法:对无严重认知障碍的重度抑郁症(DSM-IV)和脑异常(MRI评估)患者进行开放标签、6个月的随访研究。对标准抗抑郁药无反应的患者(治疗月数6.5 +/- 7.2)额外接受喹硫平(300 +/- 111 mg/d)。使用临床总体印象严重程度量表(CGI-S)和汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表(HAM-D)在基线(t0)和第1、3和6个月(t1、t3、t6)对患者进行评估。结果:9例患者纳入研究,平均年龄72.8±9.4岁。从基线到第6个月,CGI-S评分下降:5.8 +/- 0.7 (t0), 5.4 +/- 0.7 (t1), 5.0 +/- 0.8 (t3)和4.5 +/- 1.0 (t6), 6个月时与基线相比有显著改善(P = 0.006)。在6个月期间,HAM-D评分也有显著改善(t0 = 27.2 +/- 4.0, t6 = 14.8 +/- 3.8, P < 0.001)。结论:喹硫平联合治疗老年抑郁症合并脑血管损伤患者疗效确切。这项研究的结果值得在大型、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照研究中得到证实。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health
Clinical Practice and Epidemiology in Mental Health Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health is an open access online journal, which publishes Research articles, Reviews, Letters in all areas of clinical practice and epidemiology in mental health covering the following topics: Clinical and epidemiological research in psychiatry and mental health; diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of mental health conditions; and frequencies and determinants of mental health conditions in the community and the populations at risk; research and economic aspects of psychiatry, with special attention given to manuscripts presenting new results and methods in the area; and clinical epidemiologic investigation of pharmaceutical agents. Clinical Practice & Epidemiology in Mental Health, a peer reviewed journal, aims to provide the most complete and reliable source of information on current developments in the field. The emphasis will be on publishing quality articles rapidly and freely available worldwide.
期刊最新文献
Are Nurses Working in Mental Health in a Time of Changing Approaches More Exposed to Stress than other Professionals? Job Satisfaction and Perception of Respect for the Rights of Users in Seven Different Countries Worldwide. Obsessive-compulsive Symptoms Prevalence among Medical Students in Four Major Universities, Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study. Pharmacogenetic Testing in Treatment-resistant Panic Disorder: a Preliminary Analysis. Exploring Mental Health Issues and Priorities in Indonesia Through Qualitative Expert Consensus. Factors Associated with Stress among Healthcare Personnel after COVID-19 in Northeast Thailand: A Cross-sectional Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1