Is Target-Based Drug Discovery Efficient? Discovery and “Off-Target” Mechanisms of All Drugs

IF 6.8 1区 医学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL Journal of Medicinal Chemistry Pub Date : 2023-09-06 DOI:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01737
Arash Sadri*, 
{"title":"Is Target-Based Drug Discovery Efficient? Discovery and “Off-Target” Mechanisms of All Drugs","authors":"Arash Sadri*,&nbsp;","doi":"10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01737","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Target-based drug discovery is the dominant paradigm of drug discovery; however, a comprehensive evaluation of its real-world efficiency is lacking. Here, a manual systematic review of about 32000 articles and patents dating back to 150 years ago demonstrates its apparent inefficiency. Analyzing the origins of all approved drugs reveals that, despite several decades of dominance, only 9.4% of small-molecule drugs have been discovered through “target-based” assays. Moreover, the therapeutic effects of even this minimal share cannot be solely attributed and reduced to their purported targets, as they depend on numerous off-target mechanisms unconsciously incorporated by phenotypic observations. The data suggest that reductionist target-based drug discovery may be a cause of the productivity crisis in drug discovery. An evidence-based approach to enhance efficiency seems to be prioritizing, in selecting and optimizing molecules, higher-level phenotypic observations that are closer to the sought-after therapeutic effects using tools like artificial intelligence and machine learning.</p>","PeriodicalId":46,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Medicinal Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Medicinal Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.jmedchem.2c01737","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MEDICINAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Target-based drug discovery is the dominant paradigm of drug discovery; however, a comprehensive evaluation of its real-world efficiency is lacking. Here, a manual systematic review of about 32000 articles and patents dating back to 150 years ago demonstrates its apparent inefficiency. Analyzing the origins of all approved drugs reveals that, despite several decades of dominance, only 9.4% of small-molecule drugs have been discovered through “target-based” assays. Moreover, the therapeutic effects of even this minimal share cannot be solely attributed and reduced to their purported targets, as they depend on numerous off-target mechanisms unconsciously incorporated by phenotypic observations. The data suggest that reductionist target-based drug discovery may be a cause of the productivity crisis in drug discovery. An evidence-based approach to enhance efficiency seems to be prioritizing, in selecting and optimizing molecules, higher-level phenotypic observations that are closer to the sought-after therapeutic effects using tools like artificial intelligence and machine learning.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于靶点的药物发现有效吗?所有药物的发现和“脱靶”机制
基于靶点的药物发现是药物发现的主导范式;然而,缺乏对其现实世界效率的全面评估。在这里,一份对150年前约32000篇文章和专利的手动系统审查表明,它显然效率低下。分析所有获批药物的来源表明,尽管几十年来一直占据主导地位,但只有9.4%的小分子药物是通过“基于靶点”的分析发现的。此外,即使是这一最小份额的治疗效果也不能完全归因于其所谓的靶点,因为它们依赖于表型观察无意识地结合的许多脱靶机制。数据表明,基于简化目标的药物发现可能是药物发现生产力危机的原因之一。一种基于证据的提高效率的方法似乎是,在选择和优化分子时,优先考虑使用人工智能和机器学习等工具进行更接近追求的治疗效果的更高级别表型观察。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry
Journal of Medicinal Chemistry 医学-医药化学
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
11.00%
发文量
804
审稿时长
1.9 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Medicinal Chemistry is a prestigious biweekly peer-reviewed publication that focuses on the multifaceted field of medicinal chemistry. Since its inception in 1959 as the Journal of Medicinal and Pharmaceutical Chemistry, it has evolved to become a cornerstone in the dissemination of research findings related to the design, synthesis, and development of therapeutic agents. The Journal of Medicinal Chemistry is recognized for its significant impact in the scientific community, as evidenced by its 2022 impact factor of 7.3. This metric reflects the journal's influence and the importance of its content in shaping the future of drug discovery and development. The journal serves as a vital resource for chemists, pharmacologists, and other researchers interested in the molecular mechanisms of drug action and the optimization of therapeutic compounds.
期刊最新文献
3-Deazaneplanocin A (DZNep): A Drug That Deserves a Second Look. Multifunctional Molecular Hybrids Photoreleasing Nitric Oxide: Advantages, Pitfalls, and Opportunities. Journal of Medicinal Chemistry Collection: Drug Discovery in Japan. Computationally Driven Discovery of a BCR-ABL1 Kinase Inhibitor with Activity in Multidrug-Resistant Chronic Myeloid Leukemia. Discovery of a Potent, Orally Active, and Long-Lasting P2X7 Receptor Antagonist as a Preclinical Candidate for Delaying the Progression of Chronic Kidney Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1