Effect of left paratracheal pressure on left carotid blood flow.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-05 DOI:10.1111/aas.14328
Benjamin Javillier, Flavien Grandjean, Karim Ounas, Nicolas Gautier, Paul Meunier, Vincent Bonhomme, Eric Deflandre
{"title":"Effect of left paratracheal pressure on left carotid blood flow.","authors":"Benjamin Javillier, Flavien Grandjean, Karim Ounas, Nicolas Gautier, Paul Meunier, Vincent Bonhomme, Eric Deflandre","doi":"10.1111/aas.14328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Gautier et al. demonstrated that a compression in the left paratracheal region (left paratracheal pressure, LPP) can be used to seal the oesophagus. However, at this level, the left common carotid artery is very close to the carotid that could be affected during the manipulation. This study aimed to assess the hemodynamic effects of LPP on the carotid blood flow.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We prospectively included 47 healthy adult volunteers. We excluded pregnant women and people with anomalies of the carotid arteries. The common and internal carotid arteries were preliminarily studied with ultrasounds to exclude atheromatous plaques or vascular malformation. A planimetry of the common and internal carotid arteries was performed. Doppler echography served to measure the peak systolic (PSV) and end-diastolic velocities (EDV) in the common and internal carotid arteries. All measurements were repeated while applying LPP.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Forty-seven participants were enrolled (32 women; mean [SD] age: 42 [13] years). The mean PSV difference [95% CI] in the left common carotid artery before and after LPP at the group level was -15.30 [-31.09 to 0.48] cm s<sup>-1</sup> (p = .14). The mean surface difference [95% CI] in the left common carotid artery before and after LPP was 24.52 [6.11-42.92] mm<sup>2</sup> (p = .11). Similarly, the same surface at the level of the left internal carotid artery changed by -18.89 [-51.59 to 13.80] mm<sup>2</sup> after LPP (p = .58).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our results suggest that LPP does not have a significant effect on carotid blood flow in individuals without a carotid pathology. However, the safety of the manoeuvre should be evaluated in patients at risk of carotid anomalies.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":"51-55"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14328","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Gautier et al. demonstrated that a compression in the left paratracheal region (left paratracheal pressure, LPP) can be used to seal the oesophagus. However, at this level, the left common carotid artery is very close to the carotid that could be affected during the manipulation. This study aimed to assess the hemodynamic effects of LPP on the carotid blood flow.

Methods: We prospectively included 47 healthy adult volunteers. We excluded pregnant women and people with anomalies of the carotid arteries. The common and internal carotid arteries were preliminarily studied with ultrasounds to exclude atheromatous plaques or vascular malformation. A planimetry of the common and internal carotid arteries was performed. Doppler echography served to measure the peak systolic (PSV) and end-diastolic velocities (EDV) in the common and internal carotid arteries. All measurements were repeated while applying LPP.

Results: Forty-seven participants were enrolled (32 women; mean [SD] age: 42 [13] years). The mean PSV difference [95% CI] in the left common carotid artery before and after LPP at the group level was -15.30 [-31.09 to 0.48] cm s-1 (p = .14). The mean surface difference [95% CI] in the left common carotid artery before and after LPP was 24.52 [6.11-42.92] mm2 (p = .11). Similarly, the same surface at the level of the left internal carotid artery changed by -18.89 [-51.59 to 13.80] mm2 after LPP (p = .58).

Conclusions: Our results suggest that LPP does not have a significant effect on carotid blood flow in individuals without a carotid pathology. However, the safety of the manoeuvre should be evaluated in patients at risk of carotid anomalies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
左气管旁压对左颈动脉血流的影响。
引言:Gautier等人证明了左气管旁区域的压迫(左气管旁压力,LPP)可以用来密封食道。然而,在这个水平上,左颈总动脉非常靠近在操作过程中可能受到影响的颈动脉。本研究旨在评估LPP对颈动脉血流的血液动力学影响。方法:我们前瞻性地纳入了47名健康的成年志愿者。我们排除了孕妇和颈动脉异常患者。用超声对颈总动脉和颈内动脉进行初步研究,以排除动脉粥样硬化斑块或血管畸形。对颈总动脉和颈内动脉进行了面积测量。多普勒超声心动图用于测量颈总动脉和颈内动脉的收缩峰值(PSV)和舒张末期速度(EDV)。在应用LPP时重复所有测量。结果:47名参与者被纳入研究(32名女性;平均[SD]年龄:42[13]岁)。左颈总动脉在LPP前后的平均PSV差异[95%CI]为-15.30[31.09至0.48]cm s-1(p = .14) 。LPP前后左颈总动脉的平均表面差异[95%CI]为24.52[6.11-42.92]mm2(p = .11) 。同样,左颈内动脉水平的同一表面在LPP后变化了-18.89[51.59至13.80]mm2(p = .58)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,在没有颈动脉病变的个体中,LPP对颈动脉血流没有显著影响。然而,应对有颈动脉异常风险的患者进行操作的安全性评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
期刊最新文献
Effect of intraoperative methadone in robot-assisted cystectomy on postoperative opioid requirements: A randomized clinical trial. Epidural analgesia versus systemic opioids for postoperative pain management after VATS: Protocol for a systematic review. Time from pain assessment to opioid treatment in the Danish emergency departments-A multicenter cohort study. Viscoelastic testing of fibrinolytic capacity in acutely infected critically ill patients: Protocol for a scoping review. Does cytochrome 2D6 genotype affect the analgesic efficacy of codeine after ambulatory surgery? Prospective trial in 987 adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1