Effects of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists for Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY American Journal of Nephrology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-10-04 DOI:10.1159/000534366
Chen-Yi Yuan, Yuan-Cheng Gao, Yi Lin, Lin Liu, Xiao-Gang Shen, Wen-Li Zou, Min-Min Wang, Quan-Quan Shen, Li-Na Shao, Yue-Ming Liu, Jia-Wei Zhang, Zhi-Hui Pan, Yan Zhu, Jing-Ting Yu, Xu-Guang Yu, Bin Zhu
{"title":"Effects of Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists for Chronic Kidney Disease: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Chen-Yi Yuan, Yuan-Cheng Gao, Yi Lin, Lin Liu, Xiao-Gang Shen, Wen-Li Zou, Min-Min Wang, Quan-Quan Shen, Li-Na Shao, Yue-Ming Liu, Jia-Wei Zhang, Zhi-Hui Pan, Yan Zhu, Jing-Ting Yu, Xu-Guang Yu, Bin Zhu","doi":"10.1159/000534366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mineralocorticoid receptor blockade could be a potential approach for the inhibition of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. The benefits and harms of different mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in CKD are inconsistent.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study was to summarize the benefits and harms of MRAs for CKD patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases for trials assessing the effects of MRAs on non-dialysis-dependent CKD populations. Treatment and adverse effects were summarized using meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-three trials with 6 different MRAs involving 22,792 participants were included. Compared with the control group, MRAs reduced urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (weighted mean difference [WMD], -90.90 mg/g, 95% CI, -140.17 to -41.64 mg/g), 24-h urinary protein excretion (WMD, -0.20 g, 95% CI, -0.28 to -0.12 g), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (WMD, -1.99 mL/min/1.73 m2, 95% CI, -3.28 to -0.70 mL/min/1.73 m2), chronic renal failure events (RR, 0.86, 95% CI, 0.79-0.93), and cardiovascular events (RR, 0.84, 95% CI, 0.77-0.92). MRAs increased the incidence of hyperkalemia (RR, 2.04, 95% CI, 1.73-2.40) and hypotension (RR, 1.80, 95% CI, 1.41-2.31). MRAs reduced the incidence of peripheral edema (RR, 0.65, 95% CI, 0.56-0.75) but not the risk of acute kidney injury (RR, 0.94, 95% CI, 0.79-1.13). Nonsteroidal MRAs (RR, 0.66, 95% CI, 0.57-0.75) but not steroidal MRAs (RR, 0.20, 95% CI, 0.02-1.68) significantly reduced the risk of peripheral edema. Steroidal MRAs (RR, 5.68, 95% CI, 1.26-25.67) but not nonsteroidal MRAs (RR, 0.52, 95% CI, 0.22-1.22) increased the risk of breast disorders.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the CKD patients, MRAs, particularly in combination with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, reduced albuminuria/proteinuria, eGFR, and the incidence of chronic renal failure, cardiovascular and peripheral edema events, whereas increasing the incidence of hyperkalemia and hypotension, without the augment of acute kidney injury events. Nonsteroidal MRAs were superior in the reduction of more albuminuria with fewer peripheral edema events and without the augment of breast disorder events.</p>","PeriodicalId":7570,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Nephrology","volume":" ","pages":"1-17"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Nephrology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000534366","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mineralocorticoid receptor blockade could be a potential approach for the inhibition of chronic kidney disease (CKD) progression. The benefits and harms of different mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) in CKD are inconsistent.

Objectives: The aim of the study was to summarize the benefits and harms of MRAs for CKD patients.

Methods: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane databases for trials assessing the effects of MRAs on non-dialysis-dependent CKD populations. Treatment and adverse effects were summarized using meta-analysis.

Results: Fifty-three trials with 6 different MRAs involving 22,792 participants were included. Compared with the control group, MRAs reduced urinary albumin-to-creatinine ratio (weighted mean difference [WMD], -90.90 mg/g, 95% CI, -140.17 to -41.64 mg/g), 24-h urinary protein excretion (WMD, -0.20 g, 95% CI, -0.28 to -0.12 g), estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) (WMD, -1.99 mL/min/1.73 m2, 95% CI, -3.28 to -0.70 mL/min/1.73 m2), chronic renal failure events (RR, 0.86, 95% CI, 0.79-0.93), and cardiovascular events (RR, 0.84, 95% CI, 0.77-0.92). MRAs increased the incidence of hyperkalemia (RR, 2.04, 95% CI, 1.73-2.40) and hypotension (RR, 1.80, 95% CI, 1.41-2.31). MRAs reduced the incidence of peripheral edema (RR, 0.65, 95% CI, 0.56-0.75) but not the risk of acute kidney injury (RR, 0.94, 95% CI, 0.79-1.13). Nonsteroidal MRAs (RR, 0.66, 95% CI, 0.57-0.75) but not steroidal MRAs (RR, 0.20, 95% CI, 0.02-1.68) significantly reduced the risk of peripheral edema. Steroidal MRAs (RR, 5.68, 95% CI, 1.26-25.67) but not nonsteroidal MRAs (RR, 0.52, 95% CI, 0.22-1.22) increased the risk of breast disorders.

Conclusions: In the CKD patients, MRAs, particularly in combination with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/angiotensin receptor blocker, reduced albuminuria/proteinuria, eGFR, and the incidence of chronic renal failure, cardiovascular and peripheral edema events, whereas increasing the incidence of hyperkalemia and hypotension, without the augment of acute kidney injury events. Nonsteroidal MRAs were superior in the reduction of more albuminuria with fewer peripheral edema events and without the augment of breast disorder events.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
矿化皮质激素受体拮抗剂对慢性肾脏疾病的作用:系统综述和荟萃分析。
引言:不同的盐皮质激素受体拮抗剂(MRAs)对慢性肾脏疾病(CKD)的益处和危害不一致。我们旨在总结MRAs在治疗CKD中的意义。方法:我们检索MEDLINE、EMBASE和Cochrane数据库,以评估MRAs对非透析依赖性CKD人群的影响。使用荟萃分析总结了治疗和不良反应。结果:纳入了53项试验,涉及22792名参与者,涉及6种不同的MRA。与对照组相比,MRAs降低了尿白蛋白与肌酸酐的比率(WMD,-90.90 mg/g,95%CI,-140.17至-41.64 mg/g)、24小时尿蛋白排泄量(WMD为-0.20 g,95%CI,-0.28至-0.12 g)、eGFR(WMD:-1.99 ml/min/1.73 m2,95%CI:-3.28至-0.70 ml/min/11.73 m2),慢性肾功能衰竭事件(RR,0.86,95%CI,0.79至0.93)和心血管事件(RR(0.84,95%CI),0.77至0.92)。MRA增加了高钾血症(RR,2.04,95%可信区间,1.73至2.40)和低血压(RR,1.80,95%置信区间,1.41至2.31)的发生率,而不是急性肾损伤的风险(RR,0.94,95%CI,0.79-1.13)。非甾体MRA(RR,0.66,95%CI,0.57-0.75)但非甾体MRI(RR,0.20,95%CI)显著降低了外周水肿的风险。甾体MRA(RR,5.68,95%CI,1.26至25.67)而非非甾体MRAs(RR,0.52,95%CI(0.22至1.22))增加了乳腺疾病的风险。结论:在CKD患者中,MRAs,特别是与ACEI/ARB联合使用,可降低蛋白尿/蛋白尿、eGFR以及慢性肾功能衰竭、心血管和外周水肿事件的发生率,而增加高钾血症和低血压的发生率而不会增加急性肾损伤事件。非甾体类药物磁共振成像在减少更多蛋白尿、减少外周水肿事件以及不增加乳腺疾病事件方面具有优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
American Journal of Nephrology
American Journal of Nephrology 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
74
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The ''American Journal of Nephrology'' is a peer-reviewed journal that focuses on timely topics in both basic science and clinical research. Papers are divided into several sections, including:
期刊最新文献
Options for Hemodialysis Vascular Access- Should We Reconsider? Deep Learning-Based Quantification of Residual Blood Clots in Single-Use Dialyzers Using Bedside Mobile-Captured Images. Elevated Glycerol-3-Phosphate in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis: Associations with Phosphate and Fibroblast Growth Factor 23. The Power of Multiple Artificial Intelligence Models to Predict Global Chronic Kidney Disease Incidence: Who Leads the Race? The Effect of Febuxostat on Kidney Outcomes in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Asymptomatic Hyperuricemia: A Target Trial Emulation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1