Pangenotypic triple versus double therapy in HCV-infected patients after prior failure of direct-acting antivirals.

Abstract

Aim of the study: Despite the excellent effectiveness of direct-acting antivirals (DAA) in the treatment of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, still a few percent of patients fail therapy. The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of triple vs double rescue treatment in such a population.

Material and methods: The study included all consecutive DAA-experienced patients retreated with pangenotypic options from the EpiTer-2 database, a retrospective national multicenter real-world project evaluating antiviral treatment in HCV-infected patients in 2015-2023.

Results: The studied population consisted of 269 patients, of whom 208 were treated with the double (P2) and 61 with the triple (P3) pangenotypic option. No statistically significant differences were found between these subpopulations, except a significantly more frequent history of liver transplantation in the P3 group (6.6% vs. 0.5%, p = 0.01). In the P2 group, two-thirds of patients were treated with velpatasvir/sofosbuvir, while in the P3 group the majority of patients received a combination of velpatasvir/sofosbuvir/voxilaprevir. Virological response at the end of therapy was comparable in both analyzed subpopulations, but the sustained virologic response (SVR) rate was significantly higher in triple retherapy, 98.3% vs. 88.7%, p = 0.02, calculated after exclusion of patients lost to follow-up. Lower SVR was achieved in genotype 3-infected men with cirrhosis, 88.9% and 80% in P3 and P2, respectively.

Conclusions: A comparison of double and triple pangenotypic retherapy in patients after failure of DAA therapy showed a higher sustained virological response in the triple option with a comparable response at the end of therapy. The factors reducing the chances of cure were cirrhosis, genotype 3 infection and male gender.