{"title":"Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) in grocery store foods: method optimization, occurrence, and exposure assessment†","authors":"Zhao Yang, Marzieh Shojaei and Jennifer L. Guelfo","doi":"10.1039/D3EM00268C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >Dietary exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) is poorly understood. Evaluating PFAS in food is complicated by the need to evaluate varied matrices and a lack of a standard, matrix-specific sample extraction methods. Prior food studies implemented universal rather than matrix-specific extraction approaches, which may yield false negatives and an underestimation of PFAS dietary exposure if methods are not suitable to all matrices. Here the objectives were to screen and optimize PFAS extraction methods for plants, tissues, and dairy; apply optimized extraction methods to a grocery store food survey; and compare estimated exposure to published reference doses (RfDs). Optimized, matrix-specific extractions generally yielded internal standard recoveries of 50–150% and matrix spike recoveries of 70–130%. The frequency of PFAS detection in grocery store foods (16 of 22 products) was higher than in previous work. PFAS were detected at concentrations of 10 ng kg<small><sub>dw</sub></small><small><sup>−1</sup></small> (perfluorobutane sulfonate; washed green beans and perfluorohexanoic acid; unwashed tomato) to 2680 ng kg<small><sub>dw</sub></small><small><sup>−1</sup></small> (perfluorohexane sulfonate; radish). Concentrations of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in carrots, lettuce, radish, and canned green beans yielded median exposure intake (EI) values of 0.016–0.240 ng per kg<small><sub>bw</sub></small>-day, which exceeded the EPA RfD (0.0015 ng per kg<small><sub>bw</sub></small>-day). Washing reduced radish PFOA concentrations below detection, but EIs at the reporting limit still exceeded the RfD. The combination of improved data quality and greater frequency of PFAS detection <em>vs.</em> prior studies plus EI > RfD for some PFAS suggests a need for matrix-specific extractions and analysis of PFAS in additional grocery store foods from broader geographic regions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts","volume":" 12","pages":" 2015-2030"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.rsc.org/en/content/articlelanding/2023/em/d3em00268c","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Dietary exposure to per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) is poorly understood. Evaluating PFAS in food is complicated by the need to evaluate varied matrices and a lack of a standard, matrix-specific sample extraction methods. Prior food studies implemented universal rather than matrix-specific extraction approaches, which may yield false negatives and an underestimation of PFAS dietary exposure if methods are not suitable to all matrices. Here the objectives were to screen and optimize PFAS extraction methods for plants, tissues, and dairy; apply optimized extraction methods to a grocery store food survey; and compare estimated exposure to published reference doses (RfDs). Optimized, matrix-specific extractions generally yielded internal standard recoveries of 50–150% and matrix spike recoveries of 70–130%. The frequency of PFAS detection in grocery store foods (16 of 22 products) was higher than in previous work. PFAS were detected at concentrations of 10 ng kgdw−1 (perfluorobutane sulfonate; washed green beans and perfluorohexanoic acid; unwashed tomato) to 2680 ng kgdw−1 (perfluorohexane sulfonate; radish). Concentrations of perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) in carrots, lettuce, radish, and canned green beans yielded median exposure intake (EI) values of 0.016–0.240 ng per kgbw-day, which exceeded the EPA RfD (0.0015 ng per kgbw-day). Washing reduced radish PFOA concentrations below detection, but EIs at the reporting limit still exceeded the RfD. The combination of improved data quality and greater frequency of PFAS detection vs. prior studies plus EI > RfD for some PFAS suggests a need for matrix-specific extractions and analysis of PFAS in additional grocery store foods from broader geographic regions.
人们对全氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)的饮食暴露知之甚少。由于需要评估各种基质,并且缺乏标准的基质特异性样品提取方法,评估食品中的PFAS变得复杂。先前的食品研究采用了通用而非基质特异性提取方法,如果方法不适用于所有基质,可能会产生假阴性和对PFAS饮食暴露的低估。这里的目标是筛选和优化植物、组织和乳制品的PFAS提取方法;将优化提取方法应用于杂货店食品调查;并将估计的暴露量与公布的参考剂量(RfDs)进行比较。优化的基质特异性提取通常产生50-150%的内标回收率和70-130%的基质尖峰回收率。在杂货店食品中检测PFAS的频率(22种产品中有16种)高于之前的工作。PFAS的检测浓度为10 ng kgdw-1(全氟丁烷磺酸;清洗过的青豆和全氟己酸;未清洗过的番茄)至2680 ng kgdw-1[全氟己磺酸;萝卜]。胡萝卜、生菜、萝卜和罐装青豆中全氟辛酸的浓度产生的暴露摄入量中值为0.016-0.240纳克/千克体重天,超过了EPA RfD(0.0015纳克/千克重量天)。清洗使萝卜全氟辛烷磺酸浓度低于检测值,但报告限值下的EIs仍超过RfD。与先前的研究相比,数据质量的提高和PFAS检测频率的提高,加上某些PFAS的EI>RfD,表明需要对来自更广泛地理区域的其他杂货店食品中的PFAS进行基质特异性提取和分析。
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts publishes high quality papers in all areas of the environmental chemical sciences, including chemistry of the air, water, soil and sediment. We welcome studies on the environmental fate and effects of anthropogenic and naturally occurring contaminants, both chemical and microbiological, as well as related natural element cycling processes.