Compliance with CPR quality guidelines and survival after 30 days following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A retrospective study.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-19 DOI:10.1111/aas.14330
Valtteri Järvenpää, Paula Mäki, Heini Huhtala, Heini Elo, Sami Länkimäki, Piritta Setälä, Sanna Hoppu
{"title":"Compliance with CPR quality guidelines and survival after 30 days following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. A retrospective study.","authors":"Valtteri Järvenpää, Paula Mäki, Heini Huhtala, Heini Elo, Sami Länkimäki, Piritta Setälä, Sanna Hoppu","doi":"10.1111/aas.14330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Our study assessed the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) given by emergency medical services in Southern Ostrobothnia Finland, as is advised in the international guidelines. The goal was to evaluate the current quality of CPR given to patients who suffered an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and to examine possible measures for improving emergency medical services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective study was conducted on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in Southern Ostrobothnia, Finland, during a three-year period. Confounding caused by each patient's individual medical history was addressed by calculating Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), a score describing individual's risk for death in 10 years. The Utstein analysis and the CPR metrics were acquired from the medical records hospital district in question and analysed in an orderly manner using SPSS. Descriptive statistics are presented as mean (SD) and median [IQR].</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that of the 349 patients, 144 (41%) received ROSC, 96 (28%) survived to the hospital and 51 (15%) survived for at least 30 days. CPR metrics data were available for 181 patients. CCIs were 3.0 versus 5.0 (p = .157) for the ones who did and those who did not survive at least 30 days. Correspondingly, following metrics were as follows: Mean compression depth was 5.1 (1.3) versus 5.6 (0.8) cm (p = .088), median 28 [18;40] versus 40 [26;54]% of the compressions were in target depth (p = .015) and median compression rate was 113 [109;119] versus 112 [108;120] min<sup>-1</sup> (p = .757). The median no-flow fraction was 5.1 [2.8;7.1] versus 3.7 [2.5;5.5] s (p = .073). Ventricular fibrillation (OR 8.74, 95% CI 2.89-26.43, p < .001), public location (OR 3.163, 95% CI 1.03-9.69, p = .044) and compression rate of 100-110/min (OR 7.923, 95% CI 2.11-29.82, p = .002) were related to survival.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Patients who suffered out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Southern Ostrobothnia received CPR that met the international CPR quality target values. The proportion of unintentional pauses during CPR was low and the 30-day survival rate exceeded the international average.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":" ","pages":"80-90"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14330","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Our study assessed the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) given by emergency medical services in Southern Ostrobothnia Finland, as is advised in the international guidelines. The goal was to evaluate the current quality of CPR given to patients who suffered an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and to examine possible measures for improving emergency medical services.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients in Southern Ostrobothnia, Finland, during a three-year period. Confounding caused by each patient's individual medical history was addressed by calculating Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), a score describing individual's risk for death in 10 years. The Utstein analysis and the CPR metrics were acquired from the medical records hospital district in question and analysed in an orderly manner using SPSS. Descriptive statistics are presented as mean (SD) and median [IQR].

Results: We found that of the 349 patients, 144 (41%) received ROSC, 96 (28%) survived to the hospital and 51 (15%) survived for at least 30 days. CPR metrics data were available for 181 patients. CCIs were 3.0 versus 5.0 (p = .157) for the ones who did and those who did not survive at least 30 days. Correspondingly, following metrics were as follows: Mean compression depth was 5.1 (1.3) versus 5.6 (0.8) cm (p = .088), median 28 [18;40] versus 40 [26;54]% of the compressions were in target depth (p = .015) and median compression rate was 113 [109;119] versus 112 [108;120] min-1 (p = .757). The median no-flow fraction was 5.1 [2.8;7.1] versus 3.7 [2.5;5.5] s (p = .073). Ventricular fibrillation (OR 8.74, 95% CI 2.89-26.43, p < .001), public location (OR 3.163, 95% CI 1.03-9.69, p = .044) and compression rate of 100-110/min (OR 7.923, 95% CI 2.11-29.82, p = .002) were related to survival.

Conclusion: Patients who suffered out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in Southern Ostrobothnia received CPR that met the international CPR quality target values. The proportion of unintentional pauses during CPR was low and the 30-day survival rate exceeded the international average.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遵守心肺复苏质量指南和30岁后的存活率 出院心脏骤停后的几天。回顾性研究。
背景:我们的研究评估了芬兰奥斯特罗博特尼亚南部紧急医疗服务机构按照国际指南的建议进行的心肺复苏(CPR)的质量。目的是评估目前对院外心脏骤停患者进行心肺复苏的质量,并研究改善紧急医疗服务的可能措施。方法:对芬兰南奥斯特罗博特尼亚的院外心脏骤停患者进行为期三年的回顾性研究。通过计算Charlson合并症指数(CCI)来解决每个患者的个人病史引起的困惑,该指数描述了个人在10 年。Utstein分析和CPR指标是从有问题的医疗记录医院区获得的,并使用SPSS进行有序分析。描述性统计以平均值(SD)和中位数[IQR]表示。结果:我们发现,在349名患者中,144名(41%)接受了ROSC,96名(28%)存活到医院,51名(15%)存活至少30年 天。181名患者的心肺复苏指标数据可用。CCI分别为3.0和5.0(p = .157)对于存活下来的人和没有存活至少30岁的人 天。相应地,以下指标如下:平均压缩深度分别为5.1(1.3)和5.6(0.8)cm(p = .088),中值28[18;40]与40[26;54]%的按压在目标深度(p = .015),中位压缩率为113[109;119]对112[108;120] min-1(p = .757)。中值无流量分数分别为5.1[2.8;7.1]和3.7[2.5;5.5] s(p = .073)。心室颤动(OR 8.74,95%CI 2.89-26.43,p 结论:南方鸵鸟院外心脏骤停患者采用符合国际心肺复苏质量目标值的心肺复苏术。心肺复苏术中非故意停顿的比例很低,30天的存活率超过了国际平均水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
期刊最新文献
Effect of intraoperative methadone in robot-assisted cystectomy on postoperative opioid requirements: A randomized clinical trial. Epidural analgesia versus systemic opioids for postoperative pain management after VATS: Protocol for a systematic review. Time from pain assessment to opioid treatment in the Danish emergency departments-A multicenter cohort study. Viscoelastic testing of fibrinolytic capacity in acutely infected critically ill patients: Protocol for a scoping review. Does cytochrome 2D6 genotype affect the analgesic efficacy of codeine after ambulatory surgery? Prospective trial in 987 adults.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1