Incentives and disincentives to private sector reporting on family planning in Kenya: why these matter, and how they may change over time.

Gates Open Research Pub Date : 2023-08-07 eCollection Date: 2022-01-01 DOI:10.12688/gatesopenres.13909.2
Gabrielle Appleford, Daniel Mumbia, Priya Emmart
{"title":"Incentives and disincentives to private sector reporting on family planning in Kenya: <i>why these matter, and how they may change over time</i>.","authors":"Gabrielle Appleford, Daniel Mumbia, Priya Emmart","doi":"10.12688/gatesopenres.13909.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This study sought to understand private sector reporting on family planning in Kenya's health information system (KHIS). We approached this through three lenses: governance, procedural and technical. Our study looked at these areas of interest in Kenya, complemented by deeper exploration in Nairobi County. <b>Methods:</b> The study used mixed methods drawing on analysis from the KHIS and surveys, complemented by desk review. The qualitative research entailed group discussions with public sector personnel while more in-depth qualitative interviews were done with public and private sector respondents. A framework matrix was developed for the qualitative analysis. The study was approved by the Ministry of Health in March 2022 and conducted over the period March - May 2022.  <b>Results:</b> From a governance lens, private sector respondents recognised the importance of registry and reporting as a government policy requirement. From a procedural lens, private sector respondents saw reporting procedures as duplicative and parallel processes as reports are not generated through digitised information systems. From a technical lens, private sector reporting rates have improved over time however other data quality issues remain, which include over- and under-reporting of family planning services into KHIS. Secondary analysis for Nairobi County shows that the private facility contribution to family planning has declined over time while family planning access through pharmacies have grown over the same period; there is no visibility on this shift within the KHIS. Changes in private sector family service provision have implications for assumptions underpinning modern contraceptive modelled estimates and programmatic decision-making. <b>Conclusions:</b> There is limited monitoring of the incentives and disincentives for reporting by private health facilities into the KHIS. These have changed over time and place. Sustained private sector engagement is important to align incentives for reporting as is greater visibility on the role of pharmacies in family planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":12593,"journal":{"name":"Gates Open Research","volume":"6 ","pages":"124"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10520241/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gates Open Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/gatesopenres.13909.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study sought to understand private sector reporting on family planning in Kenya's health information system (KHIS). We approached this through three lenses: governance, procedural and technical. Our study looked at these areas of interest in Kenya, complemented by deeper exploration in Nairobi County. Methods: The study used mixed methods drawing on analysis from the KHIS and surveys, complemented by desk review. The qualitative research entailed group discussions with public sector personnel while more in-depth qualitative interviews were done with public and private sector respondents. A framework matrix was developed for the qualitative analysis. The study was approved by the Ministry of Health in March 2022 and conducted over the period March - May 2022.  Results: From a governance lens, private sector respondents recognised the importance of registry and reporting as a government policy requirement. From a procedural lens, private sector respondents saw reporting procedures as duplicative and parallel processes as reports are not generated through digitised information systems. From a technical lens, private sector reporting rates have improved over time however other data quality issues remain, which include over- and under-reporting of family planning services into KHIS. Secondary analysis for Nairobi County shows that the private facility contribution to family planning has declined over time while family planning access through pharmacies have grown over the same period; there is no visibility on this shift within the KHIS. Changes in private sector family service provision have implications for assumptions underpinning modern contraceptive modelled estimates and programmatic decision-making. Conclusions: There is limited monitoring of the incentives and disincentives for reporting by private health facilities into the KHIS. These have changed over time and place. Sustained private sector engagement is important to align incentives for reporting as is greater visibility on the role of pharmacies in family planning.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肯尼亚私营部门报告计划生育的激励和抑制因素:为什么这些因素很重要,以及随着时间的推移它们可能会发生什么变化。
背景:本研究旨在了解肯尼亚卫生信息系统中私营部门对计划生育的报告。我们从治理、程序和技术三个角度来看待这一问题。我们的研究考察了肯尼亚的这些感兴趣的地区,并在内罗毕县进行了更深入的勘探。方法:该研究采用了混合方法,借鉴了KHIS和调查的分析,并辅以案头审查。定性研究需要与公共部门人员进行小组讨论,同时对公共和私营部门的受访者进行了更深入的定性访谈。为定性分析制定了一个框架矩阵。该研究于2022年3月获得卫生部批准,并于2022年3-5月期间进行。结果:从治理角度来看,私营部门受访者认识到登记和报告作为政府政策要求的重要性。从程序的角度来看,私营部门的受访者认为报告程序是重复和平行的过程,因为报告不是通过数字化信息系统生成的。从技术角度来看,私营部门的报告率随着时间的推移有所提高,但其他数据质量问题仍然存在,其中包括向KHIS报告计划生育服务的过多和过少。对内罗毕县的二次分析显示,随着时间的推移,私人设施对计划生育的贡献有所下降,而同期通过药店获得计划生育服务的机会有所增加;在KHIS内部看不到这种转变。私营部门提供家庭服务的变化对现代避孕模拟估计和方案决策的假设产生了影响。结论:对私营卫生机构向KHIS报告的激励和抑制因素的监测有限。这些都随着时间和地点的变化而变化。私营部门的持续参与对于调整报告激励措施很重要,提高药店在计划生育中的作用也很重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gates Open Research
Gates Open Research Immunology and Microbiology-Immunology and Microbiology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊最新文献
Developing a framework for understanding policy decision-making behaviors in the transition of an HIV prevention program towards sustainability: a case study from Zambia's voluntary medical male circumcision program. Knowledge and uptake of contraceptive and other sexual reproductive health services among in-school adolescents in three South African townships: Baseline findings from the Girls Achieve Power (GAP Year) Trial. Using models and maps to inform Target Product Profiles and Preferred Product Characteristics: the example of Wolbachia replacement. Vaccine decision-making among pregnant women: a protocol for a cross-sectional mixed-method study in Brazil, Ghana, Kenya and Pakistan. Simulated data for census-scale entity resolution research without privacy restrictions: a large-scale dataset generated by individual-based modeling.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1