Hugo Parente, Maria Pontes Ferreira, Catarina Dantas Soares, Emanuel Costa, Francisca Guimarães, Soraia Azevedo, Daniela Santos-Faria, José Tavares-Costa, Filipa Teixeira, Carmo Afonso, Daniela Peixoto
{"title":"Barriers and alternatives to pediatric rheumatology referrals: a survey of family doctors and pediatricians in Portugal.","authors":"Hugo Parente, Maria Pontes Ferreira, Catarina Dantas Soares, Emanuel Costa, Francisca Guimarães, Soraia Azevedo, Daniela Santos-Faria, José Tavares-Costa, Filipa Teixeira, Carmo Afonso, Daniela Peixoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Access to pediatric rheumatology (PR) is not well described in Portugal. The main goal of this study was to ascertain barriers to PR referrals and subsequent alternative referral patterns among family doctors and pediatricians.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A web-based survey was e-mailed to family doctors and pediatricians practicing in Portugal, in order to investigate access to PR care issues. Descriptive and comparative analysis was performed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Two hundred and ninety-two responses were obtained, 24.7% from pediatricians and 75.3% from family doctors. Only 12% claimed to have had specific education on PR. Nearly 70% worked less than one hour away from a PR center. Twenty eight percent had referred a patient to PR at least once, and 9.3% experienced a situation in which they considered referring to PR but ultimately did not. Many referred to other specialties, primarily pediatrics, adult rheumatology, and pediatric orthopedics. Pediatricians encountered more diversified rheumatic diseases. Fifty five percent had no opinion on PR centers' support, while 24% found it sufficient. Having specific training on PR, being a pediatrician and a specialist were associated with greater referrals to PR. The most rated measure for PR referrals' improvement was promoting education. Regional access to PR's discrepancies were documented.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Mainly lack of education on PR, but also uneven national coverage and greater distances to some PR centers were the main barriers to PR referrals, in Portugal. Pediatricians seem to have better education, greater experience and more referrals to PR. The current alternatives for referral are pediatrics, adult rheumatology and pediatric orthopedics. Educational consolidation was the biggest and most rewarding inconsistency to battle against.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Access to pediatric rheumatology (PR) is not well described in Portugal. The main goal of this study was to ascertain barriers to PR referrals and subsequent alternative referral patterns among family doctors and pediatricians.
Methods: A web-based survey was e-mailed to family doctors and pediatricians practicing in Portugal, in order to investigate access to PR care issues. Descriptive and comparative analysis was performed.
Results: Two hundred and ninety-two responses were obtained, 24.7% from pediatricians and 75.3% from family doctors. Only 12% claimed to have had specific education on PR. Nearly 70% worked less than one hour away from a PR center. Twenty eight percent had referred a patient to PR at least once, and 9.3% experienced a situation in which they considered referring to PR but ultimately did not. Many referred to other specialties, primarily pediatrics, adult rheumatology, and pediatric orthopedics. Pediatricians encountered more diversified rheumatic diseases. Fifty five percent had no opinion on PR centers' support, while 24% found it sufficient. Having specific training on PR, being a pediatrician and a specialist were associated with greater referrals to PR. The most rated measure for PR referrals' improvement was promoting education. Regional access to PR's discrepancies were documented.
Conclusion: Mainly lack of education on PR, but also uneven national coverage and greater distances to some PR centers were the main barriers to PR referrals, in Portugal. Pediatricians seem to have better education, greater experience and more referrals to PR. The current alternatives for referral are pediatrics, adult rheumatology and pediatric orthopedics. Educational consolidation was the biggest and most rewarding inconsistency to battle against.
期刊介绍：
Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance.
Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
分享
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
