Safety of withholding perioperative steroids for patients with pituitary resection with an intact hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials
Sávio Batista , Jose Alberto Almeida , Stefan Koester , Luisa Glioche Gasparri , Laís Silva Santana , Bruno Henrique Dallo Gallo , Lucca B. Palavani , Raphael Bertani , José Alberto Landeiro
{"title":"Safety of withholding perioperative steroids for patients with pituitary resection with an intact hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials","authors":"Sávio Batista , Jose Alberto Almeida , Stefan Koester , Luisa Glioche Gasparri , Laís Silva Santana , Bruno Henrique Dallo Gallo , Lucca B. Palavani , Raphael Bertani , José Alberto Landeiro","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Several observational studies have evaluated the effects of pre-operative steroids (STER) for transsphenoidal pituitary removal in patients with an intact hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. However, a consensus built upon randomized studies has not been previously performed.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To comprehensively evaluate the clinical effects of patients receiving STER when compared to those not receiving steroids (NOSTER) in transsphenoidal pituitary resection, a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT) was conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>A systematic review<span> of the literature of RCTs comparing STER and NOSTER was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Databases, including PUBMED, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase were queried. The primary outcomes were </span></span>adrenal insufficiency<span> (AI) and diabetes insipidus (DI) post-operatively.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 4 final studies were included, in which 530 total patients were analyzed. The meta-analysis suggested that there was no significant difference between STER and NOSTER groups post-operatively related to transient AI (RR= 0.83, 95% CI [0.51–1.35], p = 0.45; I² = 52%), permanent AI (RR= 0.97, 95% CI [0.41–2.31], p = 0.95; I² = 0%), and permanent DI (RR= 0.62, 95% CI [0.16–2.33], p = 0.48; I² = 0%). Nevertheless, STER group had significantly lower rates of transient DI (RR= 0.60, 95% CI [0.38–0.95], p = 0.03; I² = 5%), and post-op hyponatremia (RR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.28–0.87], p = 0.02; I² = 0%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrates evidence from RCTs that patients receiving pre-operative STER are both safe and effective pre-operatively for resection of pituitary adenomas with an intact hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"234 ","pages":"Article 107974"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846723003906","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction
Several observational studies have evaluated the effects of pre-operative steroids (STER) for transsphenoidal pituitary removal in patients with an intact hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. However, a consensus built upon randomized studies has not been previously performed.
Purpose
To comprehensively evaluate the clinical effects of patients receiving STER when compared to those not receiving steroids (NOSTER) in transsphenoidal pituitary resection, a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT) was conducted.
Methods
A systematic review of the literature of RCTs comparing STER and NOSTER was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Databases, including PUBMED, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase were queried. The primary outcomes were adrenal insufficiency (AI) and diabetes insipidus (DI) post-operatively.
Results
A total of 4 final studies were included, in which 530 total patients were analyzed. The meta-analysis suggested that there was no significant difference between STER and NOSTER groups post-operatively related to transient AI (RR= 0.83, 95% CI [0.51–1.35], p = 0.45; I² = 52%), permanent AI (RR= 0.97, 95% CI [0.41–2.31], p = 0.95; I² = 0%), and permanent DI (RR= 0.62, 95% CI [0.16–2.33], p = 0.48; I² = 0%). Nevertheless, STER group had significantly lower rates of transient DI (RR= 0.60, 95% CI [0.38–0.95], p = 0.03; I² = 5%), and post-op hyponatremia (RR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.28–0.87], p = 0.02; I² = 0%).
Conclusion
This study demonstrates evidence from RCTs that patients receiving pre-operative STER are both safe and effective pre-operatively for resection of pituitary adenomas with an intact hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis.
引言:几项观察性研究评估了术前类固醇(STER)对下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴完整患者经蝶垂体切除术的效果。然而,建立在随机研究基础上的共识以前还没有进行过。目的:对随机临床试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析,以全面评估接受STER的患者与未接受类固醇(NOSTER)的患者在经蝶垂体切除术中的临床效果。方法:根据PRISMA指南,对随机对照试验中比较STER和NOSTER的文献进行系统回顾。对PUBMED、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science和Embase等数据库进行了查询。主要结果为术后肾上腺功能不全(AI)和尿崩症(DI)。结果:共纳入4项最终研究,其中分析了530名患者。荟萃分析表明,STER组和NOSTER组术后与暂时性AI(RR=0.83,95%CI[0.51-1.35],p=0.45;I²=52%)、永久性AI(RR=0.97,95%CI[0.41-2.31],p=0.95;I²=0%)和永久性DI(RR=0.62,95%CI[0.16-2.33],p=0.48;I²=0%)无显著差异。然而,STER组的瞬时DI发生率显著较低(RR=0.60,95%CI[0.38-0.95,p=0.03;I²=5%),和术后低钠血症(RR=0.49,95%CI[0.28-0.87],p=0.02;I²=0%)。结论:本研究证明,接受术前STER的患者在术前切除下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴完整的垂体腺瘤是安全有效的。
期刊介绍:
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.