Safety of withholding perioperative steroids for patients with pituitary resection with an intact hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107974
Sávio Batista , Jose Alberto Almeida , Stefan Koester , Luisa Glioche Gasparri , Laís Silva Santana , Bruno Henrique Dallo Gallo , Lucca B. Palavani , Raphael Bertani , José Alberto Landeiro
{"title":"Safety of withholding perioperative steroids for patients with pituitary resection with an intact hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials","authors":"Sávio Batista ,&nbsp;Jose Alberto Almeida ,&nbsp;Stefan Koester ,&nbsp;Luisa Glioche Gasparri ,&nbsp;Laís Silva Santana ,&nbsp;Bruno Henrique Dallo Gallo ,&nbsp;Lucca B. Palavani ,&nbsp;Raphael Bertani ,&nbsp;José Alberto Landeiro","doi":"10.1016/j.clineuro.2023.107974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Several observational studies have evaluated the effects of pre-operative steroids (STER) for transsphenoidal pituitary removal in patients with an intact hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. However, a consensus built upon randomized studies has not been previously performed.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>To comprehensively evaluate the clinical effects of patients receiving STER when compared to those not receiving steroids (NOSTER) in transsphenoidal pituitary resection, a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT) was conducted.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p><span>A systematic review<span> of the literature of RCTs comparing STER and NOSTER was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Databases, including PUBMED, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase were queried. The primary outcomes were </span></span>adrenal insufficiency<span> (AI) and diabetes insipidus (DI) post-operatively.</span></p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 4 final studies were included, in which 530 total patients were analyzed. The meta-analysis suggested that there was no significant difference between STER and NOSTER groups post-operatively related to transient AI (RR= 0.83, 95% CI [0.51–1.35], p = 0.45; I² = 52%), permanent AI (RR= 0.97, 95% CI [0.41–2.31], p = 0.95; I² = 0%), and permanent DI (RR= 0.62, 95% CI [0.16–2.33], p = 0.48; I² = 0%). Nevertheless, STER group had significantly lower rates of transient DI (RR= 0.60, 95% CI [0.38–0.95], p = 0.03; I² = 5%), and post-op hyponatremia (RR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.28–0.87], p = 0.02; I² = 0%).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This study demonstrates evidence from RCTs that patients receiving pre-operative STER are both safe and effective pre-operatively for resection of pituitary adenomas with an intact hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10385,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","volume":"234 ","pages":"Article 107974"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0303846723003906","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Several observational studies have evaluated the effects of pre-operative steroids (STER) for transsphenoidal pituitary removal in patients with an intact hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis. However, a consensus built upon randomized studies has not been previously performed.

Purpose

To comprehensively evaluate the clinical effects of patients receiving STER when compared to those not receiving steroids (NOSTER) in transsphenoidal pituitary resection, a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCT) was conducted.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature of RCTs comparing STER and NOSTER was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Databases, including PUBMED, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Embase were queried. The primary outcomes were adrenal insufficiency (AI) and diabetes insipidus (DI) post-operatively.

Results

A total of 4 final studies were included, in which 530 total patients were analyzed. The meta-analysis suggested that there was no significant difference between STER and NOSTER groups post-operatively related to transient AI (RR= 0.83, 95% CI [0.51–1.35], p = 0.45; I² = 52%), permanent AI (RR= 0.97, 95% CI [0.41–2.31], p = 0.95; I² = 0%), and permanent DI (RR= 0.62, 95% CI [0.16–2.33], p = 0.48; I² = 0%). Nevertheless, STER group had significantly lower rates of transient DI (RR= 0.60, 95% CI [0.38–0.95], p = 0.03; I² = 5%), and post-op hyponatremia (RR = 0.49, 95% CI [0.28–0.87], p = 0.02; I² = 0%).

Conclusion

This study demonstrates evidence from RCTs that patients receiving pre-operative STER are both safe and effective pre-operatively for resection of pituitary adenomas with an intact hypothalamus-pituitary-adrenal axis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴完整的垂体切除患者围手术期停用类固醇的安全性:一项随机临床试验的荟萃分析。
引言:几项观察性研究评估了术前类固醇(STER)对下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴完整患者经蝶垂体切除术的效果。然而,建立在随机研究基础上的共识以前还没有进行过。目的:对随机临床试验(RCT)进行荟萃分析,以全面评估接受STER的患者与未接受类固醇(NOSTER)的患者在经蝶垂体切除术中的临床效果。方法:根据PRISMA指南,对随机对照试验中比较STER和NOSTER的文献进行系统回顾。对PUBMED、Cochrane图书馆、Web of Science和Embase等数据库进行了查询。主要结果为术后肾上腺功能不全(AI)和尿崩症(DI)。结果:共纳入4项最终研究,其中分析了530名患者。荟萃分析表明,STER组和NOSTER组术后与暂时性AI(RR=0.83,95%CI[0.51-1.35],p=0.45;I²=52%)、永久性AI(RR=0.97,95%CI[0.41-2.31],p=0.95;I²=0%)和永久性DI(RR=0.62,95%CI[0.16-2.33],p=0.48;I²=0%)无显著差异。然而,STER组的瞬时DI发生率显著较低(RR=0.60,95%CI[0.38-0.95,p=0.03;I²=5%),和术后低钠血症(RR=0.49,95%CI[0.28-0.87],p=0.02;I²=0%)。结论:本研究证明,接受术前STER的患者在术前切除下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺轴完整的垂体腺瘤是安全有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery
Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
358
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Neurology and Neurosurgery is devoted to publishing papers and reports on the clinical aspects of neurology and neurosurgery. It is an international forum for papers of high scientific standard that are of interest to Neurologists and Neurosurgeons world-wide.
期刊最新文献
Communicating hydrocephalus in glioblastoma: Early predictors and implications for prognosis. Cerebral vascular malformation screening in hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia: Balancing low diagnostic yield against high-risk hemorrhage. Cerebral venous thrombosis after brain surgery. Baseline characteristics of patients recruited to the mannitol for cerebral oedema after acute intracerebral haemorrhage (MACE-ICH) trial Prediction of occluded-side M1 vessel diameter using pre-procedural magnetic resonance angiography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1