Analytical assay validation for acute myeloid leukemia measurable residual disease assessment by multiparametric flow cytometry

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q3 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry Pub Date : 2023-09-28 DOI:10.1002/cyto.b.22144
Jesse M. Tettero, Naveen Dakappagari, Maaike E. Heidinga, Yvonne Oussoren-Brockhoff, Diana Hanekamp, Anil Pahuja, Kerri Burns, Pavinder Kaur, Zeni Alfonso, Vincent H. J. van der Velden, Jeroen G. te Marvelde, Willemijn Hobo, Jennichjen Slomp, Costa Bachas, Angele Kelder, Kevin Nguyen, Jacqueline Cloos
{"title":"Analytical assay validation for acute myeloid leukemia measurable residual disease assessment by multiparametric flow cytometry","authors":"Jesse M. Tettero,&nbsp;Naveen Dakappagari,&nbsp;Maaike E. Heidinga,&nbsp;Yvonne Oussoren-Brockhoff,&nbsp;Diana Hanekamp,&nbsp;Anil Pahuja,&nbsp;Kerri Burns,&nbsp;Pavinder Kaur,&nbsp;Zeni Alfonso,&nbsp;Vincent H. J. van der Velden,&nbsp;Jeroen G. te Marvelde,&nbsp;Willemijn Hobo,&nbsp;Jennichjen Slomp,&nbsp;Costa Bachas,&nbsp;Angele Kelder,&nbsp;Kevin Nguyen,&nbsp;Jacqueline Cloos","doi":"10.1002/cyto.b.22144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessed by multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) has gained importance in clinical decision-making for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. However, complying with the recent In Vitro Diagnostic Regulations (IVDR) in Europe and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance in the United States requires rigorous validation prior to their use in investigational clinical trials and diagnostics. Validating AML MRD-MFC assays poses challenges due to the unique underlying disease biology and paucity of patient specimens. In this study, we describe an experimental framework for validation that meets regulatory expectations.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Our validation efforts focused on evaluating assay accuracy, analytical specificity, analytical and functional sensitivity (limit of blank (LoB), detection (LLoD) and quantitation (LLoQ)), precision, linearity, sample/reagent stability and establishing the assay background frequencies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Correlation between different MFC methods was highly significant (<i>r</i> = 0.99 for %blasts and <i>r</i> = 0.93 for %LAIPs). The analysis of LAIP specificity accurately discriminated from negative control cells. The assay demonstrated a LoB of 0.03, LLoD of 0.04, and LLoQ of 0.1%. Precision experiments yielded highly reproducible results (Coefficient of Variation &lt;20%). Stability experiments demonstrated reliable measurement of samples up to 96 h from collection. Furthermore, the reference range of LAIP frequencies in non-AML patients was below 0.1%, ranging from 0.0% to 0.04%.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In this manuscript, we present the validation of an AML MFC-MRD assay using BM/PB patient specimens, adhering to best practices. Our approach is expected to assist other laboratories in expediting their validation activities to fulfill recent health authority guidelines.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10883,"journal":{"name":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","volume":"104 6","pages":"426-439"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cyto.b.22144","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cyto.b.22144","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Measurable residual disease (MRD) assessed by multiparametric flow cytometry (MFC) has gained importance in clinical decision-making for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients. However, complying with the recent In Vitro Diagnostic Regulations (IVDR) in Europe and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) guidance in the United States requires rigorous validation prior to their use in investigational clinical trials and diagnostics. Validating AML MRD-MFC assays poses challenges due to the unique underlying disease biology and paucity of patient specimens. In this study, we describe an experimental framework for validation that meets regulatory expectations.

Methods

Our validation efforts focused on evaluating assay accuracy, analytical specificity, analytical and functional sensitivity (limit of blank (LoB), detection (LLoD) and quantitation (LLoQ)), precision, linearity, sample/reagent stability and establishing the assay background frequencies.

Results

Correlation between different MFC methods was highly significant (r = 0.99 for %blasts and r = 0.93 for %LAIPs). The analysis of LAIP specificity accurately discriminated from negative control cells. The assay demonstrated a LoB of 0.03, LLoD of 0.04, and LLoQ of 0.1%. Precision experiments yielded highly reproducible results (Coefficient of Variation <20%). Stability experiments demonstrated reliable measurement of samples up to 96 h from collection. Furthermore, the reference range of LAIP frequencies in non-AML patients was below 0.1%, ranging from 0.0% to 0.04%.

Conclusion

In this manuscript, we present the validation of an AML MFC-MRD assay using BM/PB patient specimens, adhering to best practices. Our approach is expected to assist other laboratories in expediting their validation activities to fulfill recent health authority guidelines.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过多参数流式细胞术评估急性髓系白血病可测量残余疾病的分析测定验证。
背景:通过多参数流式细胞术(MFC)评估可测量残余疾病(MRD)在急性髓细胞白血病(AML)患者的临床决策中具有重要意义。然而,遵守欧洲最新的体外诊断法规(IVDR)和美国食品药品监督管理局(FDA)的指导意见,需要在将其用于研究性临床试验和诊断之前进行严格的验证。由于独特的潜在疾病生物学和缺乏患者样本,验证AML MRD-MFC测定带来了挑战。在这项研究中,我们描述了一个符合监管期望的验证实验框架。方法:我们的验证工作集中在评估测定准确性、分析特异性、分析和功能敏感性(空白限度(LoB)、检测(LLoD)和定量(LLoQ))、精密度、线性、样品/试剂稳定性,以及确定测定背景频率。结果:不同MFC方法之间的相关性非常显著(r = 爆炸百分比0.99,r = %LAIP为0.93)。LAIP特异性的分析准确地区分了阴性对照细胞。该测定显示了0.03的LoB、0.04的LLoD,LLoQ为0.1%。精密实验产生了高度可重复的结果(变异系数结论:在这份手稿中,我们根据最佳实践,使用BM/PB患者样本对AML MFC-MRD测定进行了验证。我们的方法有望帮助其他实验室加快验证活动,以满足卫生当局最近的指导方针。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
32.40%
发文量
51
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cytometry Part B: Clinical Cytometry features original research reports, in-depth reviews and special issues that directly relate to and palpably impact clinical flow, mass and image-based cytometry. These may include clinical and translational investigations important in the diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic management of patients. Thus, we welcome research papers from various disciplines related [but not limited to] hematopathologists, hematologists, immunologists and cell biologists with clinically relevant and innovative studies investigating individual-cell analytics and/or separations. In addition to the types of papers indicated above, we also welcome Letters to the Editor, describing case reports or important medical or technical topics relevant to our readership without the length and depth of a full original report.
期刊最新文献
Prospective feasibility of a minimal BH3 profiling assay in acute myeloid leukemia. PICALM::MLLT10 fusion gene positive acute myeloid leukemia with PHF6 mutation and presented with CD7 positive immunophenotype. SingletSeeker: an unsupervised clustering approach for automated singlet discrimination in cytometry. ClearLLab 10C reagents panel can be applied to analyze paucicellular samples by flow cytometry. Improved identification of clinically relevant Acute Leukemia subtypes using standardized EuroFlow panels versus non-standardized approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1