Should we initiate vasopressors earlier in patients with septic shock: A mini systemic review.

Hang-Xiang Zhou, Chun-Fu Yang, He-Yan Wang, Yin Teng, Hang-Yong He
{"title":"Should we initiate vasopressors earlier in patients with septic shock: A mini systemic review.","authors":"Hang-Xiang Zhou,&nbsp;Chun-Fu Yang,&nbsp;He-Yan Wang,&nbsp;Yin Teng,&nbsp;Hang-Yong He","doi":"10.5492/wjccm.v12.i4.204","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Septic shock treatment remains a major challenge for intensive care units, despite the recent prominent advances in both management and outcomes. Vasopressors serve as a cornerstone of septic shock therapy, but there is still controversy over the timing of administration. Specifically, it remains unclear whether vasopressors should be used early in the course of treatment. Here, we provide a systematic review of the literature on the timing of vasopressor administration. Research was systematically identified through PubMed, Embase and Cochrane searching according to PRISMA guidelines. Fourteen studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. The pathophysiological basis for early vasopressor use was classified, with the exploration on indications for the early administration of mono-vasopressors or their combination with vasopressin or angiotensinII. We found that mortality was 28.1%-47.7% in the early vasopressors group, and 33.6%-54.5% in the control group. We also investigated the issue of vasopressor responsiveness. Furthermore, we acknowledged the subsequent challenge of administration of high-dose norepinephrine <i>via</i> peripheral veins with early vasopressor use. Based on the literature review, we propose a possible protocol for the early initiation of vasopressors in septic shock resuscitation.</p>","PeriodicalId":66959,"journal":{"name":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/8a/d4/WJCCM-12-204.PMC10515096.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"世界危重病急救学杂志(英文版)","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5492/wjccm.v12.i4.204","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Septic shock treatment remains a major challenge for intensive care units, despite the recent prominent advances in both management and outcomes. Vasopressors serve as a cornerstone of septic shock therapy, but there is still controversy over the timing of administration. Specifically, it remains unclear whether vasopressors should be used early in the course of treatment. Here, we provide a systematic review of the literature on the timing of vasopressor administration. Research was systematically identified through PubMed, Embase and Cochrane searching according to PRISMA guidelines. Fourteen studies met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. The pathophysiological basis for early vasopressor use was classified, with the exploration on indications for the early administration of mono-vasopressors or their combination with vasopressin or angiotensinII. We found that mortality was 28.1%-47.7% in the early vasopressors group, and 33.6%-54.5% in the control group. We also investigated the issue of vasopressor responsiveness. Furthermore, we acknowledged the subsequent challenge of administration of high-dose norepinephrine via peripheral veins with early vasopressor use. Based on the literature review, we propose a possible protocol for the early initiation of vasopressors in septic shock resuscitation.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们是否应该在感染性休克患者中尽早使用血管升压药:一项小型系统综述。
尽管最近在管理和结果方面取得了显著进展,但败血症休克治疗仍然是重症监护室面临的主要挑战。加压素是感染性休克治疗的基石,但在给药时间上仍存在争议。具体而言,目前尚不清楚是否应在治疗早期使用血管升压药。在此,我们对有关血管升压药给药时间的文献进行了系统综述。根据PRISMA指南,通过PubMed、Embase和Cochrane搜索系统地确定了研究。14项研究符合资格标准并被纳入审查。对早期使用血管升压药的病理生理学基础进行了分类,探讨了早期使用单血管升压药或与血管加压素或血管紧张素II联合使用的适应症。我们发现,早期血管升压药组的死亡率为28.1%-47.7%,对照组为33.6%-54.5%。我们还研究了血管升压反应性的问题。此外,我们认识到通过外周静脉给予高剂量去甲肾上腺素并早期使用血管升压药的后续挑战。在文献综述的基础上,我们提出了一种可能的方案,用于在感染性休克复苏中早期启动血管升压药。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
216
期刊最新文献
Antimicrobial and synergistic effects of lemongrass and geranium essential oils against Streptococcus mutans, Staphylococcus aureus, and Candida spp. Driving pressure: A useful tool for reducing postoperative pulmonary complications. Early clinical outcomes of two regimens of prophylactic antibiotics in cardiac surgical patients with delayed sternal closure. Impact of different intravenous bolus rates on fluid and electrolyte balance and mortality in critically ill patients. Low T3 vs low T3T4 euthyroid sick syndrome in septic shock patients: A prospective observational cohort study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1