Development and validation of the early warning system scores ontology.

IF 1.6 3区 工程技术 Q3 MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY Journal of Biomedical Semantics Pub Date : 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1186/s13326-023-00296-6
Cilia E Zayas, Justin M Whorton, Kevin W Sexton, Charles D Mabry, S Clint Dowland, Mathias Brochhausen
{"title":"Development and validation of the early warning system scores ontology.","authors":"Cilia E Zayas, Justin M Whorton, Kevin W Sexton, Charles D Mabry, S Clint Dowland, Mathias Brochhausen","doi":"10.1186/s13326-023-00296-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Clinical early warning scoring systems, have improved patient outcomes in a range of specializations and global contexts. These systems are used to predict patient deterioration. A multitude of patient-level physiological decompensation data has been made available through the widespread integration of early warning scoring systems within EHRs across national and international health care organizations. These data can be used to promote secondary research. The diversity of early warning scoring systems and various EHR systems is one barrier to secondary analysis of early warning score data. Given that early warning score parameters are varied, this makes it difficult to query across providers and EHR systems. Moreover, mapping and merging the parameters is challenging. We develop and validate the Early Warning System Scores Ontology (EWSSO), representing three commonly used early warning scores: the National Early Warning Score (NEWS), the six-item modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), and the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) to overcome these problems.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We apply the Software Development Lifecycle Framework-conceived by Winston Boyce in 1970-to model the activities involved in organizing, producing, and evaluating the EWSSO. We also follow OBO Foundry Principles and the principles of best practice for domain ontology design, terms, definitions, and classifications to meet BFO requirements for ontology building.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We developed twenty-nine new classes, reused four classes and four object properties to create the EWSSO. When we queried the data our ontology-based process could differentiate between necessary and unnecessary features for score calculation 100% of the time. Further, our process applied the proper temperature conversions for the early warning score calculator 100% of the time.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Using synthetic datasets, we demonstrate the EWSSO can be used to generate and query health system data on vital signs and provide input to calculate the NEWS, six-item MEWS, and qSOFA. Future work includes extending the EWSSO by introducing additional early warning scores for adult and pediatric patient populations and creating patient profiles that contain clinical, demographic, and outcomes data regarding the patient.</p>","PeriodicalId":15055,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biomedical Semantics","volume":"14 1","pages":"14"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10510162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biomedical Semantics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13326-023-00296-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Clinical early warning scoring systems, have improved patient outcomes in a range of specializations and global contexts. These systems are used to predict patient deterioration. A multitude of patient-level physiological decompensation data has been made available through the widespread integration of early warning scoring systems within EHRs across national and international health care organizations. These data can be used to promote secondary research. The diversity of early warning scoring systems and various EHR systems is one barrier to secondary analysis of early warning score data. Given that early warning score parameters are varied, this makes it difficult to query across providers and EHR systems. Moreover, mapping and merging the parameters is challenging. We develop and validate the Early Warning System Scores Ontology (EWSSO), representing three commonly used early warning scores: the National Early Warning Score (NEWS), the six-item modified Early Warning Score (MEWS), and the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) to overcome these problems.

Methods: We apply the Software Development Lifecycle Framework-conceived by Winston Boyce in 1970-to model the activities involved in organizing, producing, and evaluating the EWSSO. We also follow OBO Foundry Principles and the principles of best practice for domain ontology design, terms, definitions, and classifications to meet BFO requirements for ontology building.

Results: We developed twenty-nine new classes, reused four classes and four object properties to create the EWSSO. When we queried the data our ontology-based process could differentiate between necessary and unnecessary features for score calculation 100% of the time. Further, our process applied the proper temperature conversions for the early warning score calculator 100% of the time.

Conclusions: Using synthetic datasets, we demonstrate the EWSSO can be used to generate and query health system data on vital signs and provide input to calculate the NEWS, six-item MEWS, and qSOFA. Future work includes extending the EWSSO by introducing additional early warning scores for adult and pediatric patient populations and creating patient profiles that contain clinical, demographic, and outcomes data regarding the patient.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
预警系统评分本体的开发和验证。
背景:临床预警评分系统在一系列专业和全球背景下改善了患者的预后。这些系统用于预测患者病情恶化。通过在国家和国际卫生保健组织的EHR中广泛集成早期预警评分系统,已经提供了大量患者水平的生理失代偿数据。这些数据可用于促进二次研究。预警评分系统和各种EHR系统的多样性是对预警评分数据进行二次分析的障碍之一。鉴于预警分数参数各不相同,因此很难在供应商和EHR系统之间进行查询。此外,映射和合并参数也是一项挑战。为了克服这些问题,我们开发并验证了预警系统分数本体论(EWSSO),它代表了三种常用的预警分数:国家预警分数(NEWS)、六项修正预警分数(MEWS)和快速顺序器官衰竭评估(qSOFA)。方法:我们应用Winston Boyce在1970年提出的软件开发生命周期框架来对组织、生产和评估EWSSO所涉及的活动进行建模。我们还遵循海外建筑运营管理局铸造原则和领域本体设计、术语、定义和分类的最佳实践原则,以满足BFO对本体构建的要求。结果:我们开发了二十九个新类,重用了四个类和四个对象属性来创建EWSSO。当我们查询数据时,我们基于本体的过程可以100%区分必要和不必要的特征,用于分数计算。此外,我们的过程在100%的时间内为预警分数计算器应用了适当的温度转换。结论:使用合成数据集,我们证明了EWSSO可以用于生成和查询健康系统的生命体征数据,并为计算NEWS、六项MEWS和qSOFA提供输入。未来的工作包括通过为成人和儿科患者群体引入额外的早期预警分数来扩展EWSSO,并创建包含患者临床、人口统计和结果数据的患者档案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Biomedical Semantics
Journal of Biomedical Semantics MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
28
审稿时长
30 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Biomedical Semantics addresses issues of semantic enrichment and semantic processing in the biomedical domain. The scope of the journal covers two main areas: Infrastructure for biomedical semantics: focusing on semantic resources and repositories, meta-data management and resource description, knowledge representation and semantic frameworks, the Biomedical Semantic Web, and semantic interoperability. Semantic mining, annotation, and analysis: focusing on approaches and applications of semantic resources; and tools for investigation, reasoning, prediction, and discoveries in biomedicine.
期刊最新文献
Dynamic Retrieval Augmented Generation of Ontologies using Artificial Intelligence (DRAGON-AI). MeSH2Matrix: combining MeSH keywords and machine learning for biomedical relation classification based on PubMed. Annotation of epilepsy clinic letters for natural language processing An extensible and unifying approach to retrospective clinical data modeling: the BrainTeaser Ontology. Concretizing plan specifications as realizables within the OBO foundry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1