Outcome of dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for limited disease small cell lung cancer.

Radiation oncology journal Pub Date : 2023-09-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-26 DOI:10.3857/roj.2023.00591
Eunyeong Yang, Young Seob Shin, Ji Hyeon Joo, Wonsik Choi, Su Ssan Kim, Eun Kyung Choi, Jaeha Lee, Si Yeol Song
{"title":"Outcome of dose-escalated intensity-modulated radiotherapy for limited disease small cell lung cancer.","authors":"Eunyeong Yang,&nbsp;Young Seob Shin,&nbsp;Ji Hyeon Joo,&nbsp;Wonsik Choi,&nbsp;Su Ssan Kim,&nbsp;Eun Kyung Choi,&nbsp;Jaeha Lee,&nbsp;Si Yeol Song","doi":"10.3857/roj.2023.00591","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>An optimal once-daily radiotherapy (RT) regimen is under investigation for definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). We compared the efficacy and safety of dose escalation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Between January 2016 and March 2021, patients treated with definitive CCRT for LD-SCLC with IMRT were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received a total dose <50 Gy or those with a history of thoracic RT or surgery were excluded. The patients were divided into two groups (standard and dose-escalated) based on the total biologically effective dose (BED, α/β = 10) of 70 Gy. The chemotherapeutic regimen comprised four cycles of etoposide and cisplatin.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and twenty-two patients were analyzed and the median follow-up was 27.8 months (range, 4.4 to 76.9 months). The median age of the patients was 63 years (range, 35 to 78 years) and the majority had a history of smoking (86.0%). The 1- and 3-year overall survival rates of the escalated dose group were significantly higher than those of the standard group (93.5% and 50.5% vs. 76.7% and 33.3%, respectively; p = 0.008), as were the 1- and 3-year freedom from in-field failure rates (91.4% and 66.5% vs. 73.8% and 46.9%, respectively; p = 0.018). The incidence of grade 2 or higher acute and late pneumonitis was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.062, 0.185).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dose-escalated once-daily CCRT with IMRT led to improved locoregional control and survival, with no increase in toxicity.</p>","PeriodicalId":94184,"journal":{"name":"Radiation oncology journal","volume":"41 3","pages":"199-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/94/8e/roj-2023-00591.PMC10556837.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation oncology journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2023.00591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: An optimal once-daily radiotherapy (RT) regimen is under investigation for definitive concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) in limited disease small cell lung cancer (LD-SCLC). We compared the efficacy and safety of dose escalation with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT).

Materials and methods: Between January 2016 and March 2021, patients treated with definitive CCRT for LD-SCLC with IMRT were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who received a total dose <50 Gy or those with a history of thoracic RT or surgery were excluded. The patients were divided into two groups (standard and dose-escalated) based on the total biologically effective dose (BED, α/β = 10) of 70 Gy. The chemotherapeutic regimen comprised four cycles of etoposide and cisplatin.

Results: One hundred and twenty-two patients were analyzed and the median follow-up was 27.8 months (range, 4.4 to 76.9 months). The median age of the patients was 63 years (range, 35 to 78 years) and the majority had a history of smoking (86.0%). The 1- and 3-year overall survival rates of the escalated dose group were significantly higher than those of the standard group (93.5% and 50.5% vs. 76.7% and 33.3%, respectively; p = 0.008), as were the 1- and 3-year freedom from in-field failure rates (91.4% and 66.5% vs. 73.8% and 46.9%, respectively; p = 0.018). The incidence of grade 2 or higher acute and late pneumonitis was not significantly different between the two groups (p = 0.062, 0.185).

Conclusion: Dose-escalated once-daily CCRT with IMRT led to improved locoregional control and survival, with no increase in toxicity.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
剂量递增调强放疗治疗局限性小细胞肺癌癌症的疗效。
目的:正在研究一种最佳的每日一次放射治疗(RT)方案,用于限制性疾病小细胞肺癌癌症(LD-SCLC)的最终并发放化疗(CCRT)。我们比较了剂量递增与调强放疗(IMRT)的疗效和安全性。材料和方法:在2016年1月至2021年3月期间,对接受明确CCRT治疗的LD-SCLC伴IMRT的患者进行了回顾性审查。接受总剂量治疗的患者结果:对122名患者进行了分析,中位随访时间为27.8个月(范围为4.4至76.9个月)。患者的中位年龄为63岁(范围为35-78岁),大多数患者有吸烟史(86.0%)。递增剂量组的1年和3年总生存率显著高于标准组(分别为93.5%和50.5%,76.7%和33.3%;p=0.008),1年和3年无现场失败率(分别为91.4%和66.5%,73.8%和46.9%;p=0.018)。两组之间2级或更高级别急性和晚期肺炎的发生率没有显著差异(p=0.062,0.185)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reinforcing treatment and evaluation workflow of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy for refractory ventricular tachycardia. Role of memantine to mitigate radiation-induced cognitive dysfunction in brain metastasis patient receiving whole brain radiotherapy: a systematic review. The first Korean carbon-ion radiation therapy facility: current status of the Heavy-ion Therapy Center at the Yonsei Cancer Center. Unilateral radiation therapy for well-lateralized tonsillar cancer with multiple ipsilateral neck nodes: should we encourage patients take risks and pursue quality of life or not? Decoding the influence of external beam radiotherapy to brachytherapy duration and overall treatment on response and early recurrences in cervical cancer patients treated with chemoradiation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1