A study to assess the impact of the cobas point-of-care RT-PCR assay (SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A/B) on patient clinical management in the emergency department of the University of California at Davis Medical Center

IF 4 3区 医学 Q2 VIROLOGY Journal of Clinical Virology Pub Date : 2023-09-18 DOI:10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105597
Larissa May , Elissa M. Robbins , Jesse A. Canchola , Kamal Chugh , Nam K. Tran
{"title":"A study to assess the impact of the cobas point-of-care RT-PCR assay (SARS-CoV-2 and Influenza A/B) on patient clinical management in the emergency department of the University of California at Davis Medical Center","authors":"Larissa May ,&nbsp;Elissa M. Robbins ,&nbsp;Jesse A. Canchola ,&nbsp;Kamal Chugh ,&nbsp;Nam K. Tran","doi":"10.1016/j.jcv.2023.105597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for reduction of transmission and clinical decision-making. Several rapid (&lt;30 min) molecular point-of-care (POC) tests based on nucleic acid amplification exist for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 &amp; Influenza A/B infections.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This unblinded, pre-post study enrolled consecutive patients with symptoms/signs consistent with SARS-CoV-2 infection presenting to the University of California, Davis emergency department (ED). Outcomes following implementation of the cobas® SARS-CoV-2 &amp; Influenza A/B test for use on the cobas Liat System (intervention: December 2020–May 2021) were compared with previous standard-of-care using centralized laboratory reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methods (control: April 2020–October 2020).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Electronic health records of 8879 symptomatic patient visits were analyzed, comprising 4339 and 4540 visits and 538 and 638 positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test results in the control and intervention periods, respectively. Compared with the control period, turnaround time (TAT) was shorter in the intervention period (median 0.98 vs 12.30 h; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). ED length of stay (LOS) was generally longer in the intervention period compared with the control period, but for those SARS-CoV-2-negative who were admitted, ED LOS was shorter (median 12.53 vs 17.93 h; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). The rate of antibiotic prescribing was lower in the intervention than in the control period (42.86% vs 49.16%; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001) and antiviral prescribing was higher (7.64% vs 5.49%; <em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>This real-world study confirms faster TAT with a POC RT-PCR method in an emergency care setting and highlights the importance of rapid SARS-CoV-2 detection to aid patient management and inform treatment decisions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":15517,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Virology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Virology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1386653223002202","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"VIROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background

Rapid detection of SARS-CoV-2 is crucial for reduction of transmission and clinical decision-making. Several rapid (<30 min) molecular point-of-care (POC) tests based on nucleic acid amplification exist for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B infections.

Methods

This unblinded, pre-post study enrolled consecutive patients with symptoms/signs consistent with SARS-CoV-2 infection presenting to the University of California, Davis emergency department (ED). Outcomes following implementation of the cobas® SARS-CoV-2 & Influenza A/B test for use on the cobas Liat System (intervention: December 2020–May 2021) were compared with previous standard-of-care using centralized laboratory reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) methods (control: April 2020–October 2020).

Results

Electronic health records of 8879 symptomatic patient visits were analyzed, comprising 4339 and 4540 visits and 538 and 638 positive SARS-CoV-2 PCR test results in the control and intervention periods, respectively. Compared with the control period, turnaround time (TAT) was shorter in the intervention period (median 0.98 vs 12.30 h; p < 0.0001). ED length of stay (LOS) was generally longer in the intervention period compared with the control period, but for those SARS-CoV-2-negative who were admitted, ED LOS was shorter (median 12.53 vs 17.93 h; p < 0.0001). The rate of antibiotic prescribing was lower in the intervention than in the control period (42.86% vs 49.16%; p < 0.0001) and antiviral prescribing was higher (7.64% vs 5.49%; p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

This real-world study confirms faster TAT with a POC RT-PCR method in an emergency care setting and highlights the importance of rapid SARS-CoV-2 detection to aid patient management and inform treatment decisions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一项评估cobas护理点RT-PCR检测(严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型和流感A/B型)对加州大学戴维斯医学中心急诊科患者临床管理影响的研究。
背景:快速检测严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型对于减少传播和临床决策至关重要。几种快速(方法:这项未盲的前后研究招募了连续的患者,这些患者的症状/体征与加州大学戴维斯分校急诊科(ED)的严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型感染一致。在cobas Liat系统上使用cobas®严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型和流感A/B型测试(干预:2020年12月至2021年5月)后的结果与之前使用集中实验室逆转录聚合酶链式反应(RT-PCR)方法的护理标准(对照:2020年4月至2020年10月)进行了比较。结果:8879名有症状患者就诊的电子健康记录分析,包括分别在控制期和干预期的4339次和4540次就诊以及538次和638次严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型PCR阳性检测结果。与对照期相比,干预期的周转时间(TAT)更短(中位数0.98比12.30小时;p结论:这项真实世界的研究证实了在急救环境中使用POC RT-PCR方法更快的周转时间,并强调了快速检测严重急性呼吸系统综合征冠状病毒2型对帮助患者管理和告知治疗决策的重要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Virology
Journal of Clinical Virology 医学-病毒学
CiteScore
22.70
自引率
1.10%
发文量
149
审稿时长
24 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Virology, an esteemed international publication, serves as the official journal for both the Pan American Society for Clinical Virology and The European Society for Clinical Virology. Dedicated to advancing the understanding of human virology in clinical settings, the Journal of Clinical Virology focuses on disseminating research papers and reviews pertaining to the clinical aspects of virology. Its scope encompasses articles discussing diagnostic methodologies and virus-induced clinical conditions, with an emphasis on practicality and relevance to clinical practice. The journal publishes on topics that include: • new diagnostic technologies • nucleic acid amplification and serologic testing • targeted and metagenomic next-generation sequencing • emerging pandemic viral threats • respiratory viruses • transplant viruses • chronic viral infections • cancer-associated viruses • gastrointestinal viruses • central nervous system viruses • one health (excludes animal health)
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Circulating serotypes and genotypes of dengue virus during the 2023 outbreak in Eastern Nepal Opportunities and challenges for the U.S. laboratory response to highly pathogenic avian influenza A(H5N1) Performance evaluation of the quantitative assay Adenovirus ELITe MGB® Kit on EDTA-plasma, using the ELITe BeGenius® system Influenza C virus in U.S. children with acute respiratory infection 2016–2019
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1