The Effect of Illumination on Positive Fusional Vergence.

Q3 Medicine British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-29 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.22599/bioj.296
Raisul Azam, Sourav Karmakar, Animesh Mondal, Gaurav Kumar Bhardwaj
{"title":"The Effect of Illumination on Positive Fusional Vergence.","authors":"Raisul Azam,&nbsp;Sourav Karmakar,&nbsp;Animesh Mondal,&nbsp;Gaurav Kumar Bhardwaj","doi":"10.22599/bioj.296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Positive fusional vergence (PFV) is vital in maintaining fusion in critical and continuous near tasks such as reading or performing digital screen tasks. This study investigated how PFV changed under various lighting conditions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This cross-sectional study recruited 34 participants aged between 21 and 25 years, with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 0.0 logMAR and insignificant refractive error. Three different illuminations-low illumination (50 lux), medium lighting (100 lux), and high illumination (150 lux)-were used to examine the ocular parameters PFV (blur, break, and recovery points), contrast sensitivity and pupil diameter.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pupil diameter changed significantly in different room illuminations (<i>p</i> = 0.00). There was no significant difference in contrast sensitivity across the three levels of room illumination (<i>p</i> = 0.368). Mean PFV (SD) (blur) was 14.5 (2.5) in 50 lux, 10.2 (2.2) in 100 lux, and 8.2 (2.1) in 150 lux. Under 50, 100 and 150 lux, respectively, the mean PFV (SD) (break) values were 16.7 (2.4), 13.4 (1.8), and 10.8 (2.2), and the mean PFV (SD) (recovery) values were 13.3 (2.1), 10.7 (2.1), and 7.5 (2.7). With increased illumination levels, PFV blur, break, and recovery values were significantly lower (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>PFV values were significantly higher in lower illumination. Clinicians should be aware that room illumination affected the PFV values measured.</p>","PeriodicalId":36083,"journal":{"name":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","volume":"19 1","pages":"78-84"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10541229/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British and Irish Orthoptic Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22599/bioj.296","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Positive fusional vergence (PFV) is vital in maintaining fusion in critical and continuous near tasks such as reading or performing digital screen tasks. This study investigated how PFV changed under various lighting conditions.

Methods: This cross-sectional study recruited 34 participants aged between 21 and 25 years, with best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) 0.0 logMAR and insignificant refractive error. Three different illuminations-low illumination (50 lux), medium lighting (100 lux), and high illumination (150 lux)-were used to examine the ocular parameters PFV (blur, break, and recovery points), contrast sensitivity and pupil diameter.

Results: Pupil diameter changed significantly in different room illuminations (p = 0.00). There was no significant difference in contrast sensitivity across the three levels of room illumination (p = 0.368). Mean PFV (SD) (blur) was 14.5 (2.5) in 50 lux, 10.2 (2.2) in 100 lux, and 8.2 (2.1) in 150 lux. Under 50, 100 and 150 lux, respectively, the mean PFV (SD) (break) values were 16.7 (2.4), 13.4 (1.8), and 10.8 (2.2), and the mean PFV (SD) (recovery) values were 13.3 (2.1), 10.7 (2.1), and 7.5 (2.7). With increased illumination levels, PFV blur, break, and recovery values were significantly lower (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: PFV values were significantly higher in lower illumination. Clinicians should be aware that room illumination affected the PFV values measured.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
光照对正融合锐度的影响。
背景:正融合收敛(PFV)对于在阅读或执行数字屏幕任务等关键和连续的近距离任务中保持融合至关重要。本研究调查了PFV在不同光照条件下的变化。方法:这项横断面研究招募了34名年龄在21至25岁之间的参与者,他们的最佳矫正视力(BCVA)为0.0logMAR,屈光不正不明显。使用三种不同的照明——低照明(50勒克斯)、中等照明(100勒克斯)和高照明(150勒克斯)——来检查眼睛参数PFV(模糊、中断和恢复点)、对比敏感度和瞳孔直径。结果:瞳孔直径在不同的房间照明下发生了显著变化(p=0.00)。三个房间照明水平的对比敏感度没有显著差异(p=0.368)。平均PFV(SD)(模糊)在50勒克斯为14.5(2.5),在100勒克斯为10.2(2.2),在150勒克斯为8.2(2.1)。在50、100和150勒克斯下,平均PFV(SD)(断裂)值分别为16.7(2.4)、13.4(1.8)和10.8。临床医生应该意识到房间照明会影响PFV测量值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal
British and Irish Orthoptic Journal Health Professions-Optometry
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Opinions on Amblyopia Treatment in Microtropia - A Questionnaire Study of Orthoptists in Scandinavia. Spectrum of Visual Dysfunction Detected by a Novel Testing Protocol Within a Special School Eye Care Service. Artificial Intelligence Chatbots (ChatGPT and Google Gemini) Versus Traditional Patient Information Leaflets for Local Anesthesia in Eye Surgery: Correspondence. Compliance and Determinants of Spectacle Wear Among Moroccan Adults Residing Beni-Mellal Khénifra Region. Risk Factors for Acute Acquired Comitant Esotropia in Children and Young Adults: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1