Impact of a Standardized, Pharmacist-Initiated "Test-Claim" Workflow for Anticipating Barriers to Accessing Discharge Antimicrobials.

IF 1.3 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmacy Technology Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-02 DOI:10.1177/87551225231196047
Surafel G Mulugeta, Nancy C MacDonald, Caren J El-Khoury, Susan L Davis, Rachel M Kenney
{"title":"Impact of a Standardized, Pharmacist-Initiated \"Test-Claim\" Workflow for Anticipating Barriers to Accessing Discharge Antimicrobials.","authors":"Surafel G Mulugeta, Nancy C MacDonald, Caren J El-Khoury, Susan L Davis, Rachel M Kenney","doi":"10.1177/87551225231196047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> Inability to access and afford discharge oral antimicrobials may delay discharges or result in therapeutic failure. \"Test-claims\" have the potential to identify such barriers. <b>Objective:</b> This study evaluated discharge antimicrobial access and patient outcomes after implementation of a standardized, inpatient pharmacist-initiated antimicrobial discharge medication cost inquiry (aDMCI) process. <b>Methods:</b> This was an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, pilot retrospective cohort study that included adults admitted for ≥72 hours from November 1, 2018, to February 28, 2019, and discharged on oral antimicrobials. Patients with a cost inquiry (aDMCI group) were compared with those without (standard-of-care, SOC, group). Primary endpoint was discharge delay. Secondary endpoints included percentage of patients discharged on suboptimal antimicrobials and medication errors from aDMCI. <b>Results:</b> 84 patients were included: 43 in SOC and 41 in aDMCI. Seventy-five antimicrobial cost inquiries were evaluated among 41 patients. There were no discharge delays or medication errors associated with the standardized \"test-claim\" (aDMCI) workflow. Patients in the SOC group had a greater Charlson Comorbidity Index (4 [2-6] vs 2 [1-4], <i>P =</i>0.004), were more likely to be immunosuppressed (24, 56% vs 12, 29%; <i>P =</i>0.014), and had longer hospitalization (8 [5-15] vs 6 [5-9] days, <i>P =</i>0.026). Primary access barriers were prior-authorization (8, 11%) and associated with linezolid and moxifloxacin cost inquiries. Most aDMCIs results were available in <24 hours (66, 88%). <b>Conclusions:</b> The aDMCI process is safe and offers an actionable transition of care tool that can identify barriers to accessing discharge medications while insulating patients from surprise out-of-pocket cost.</p>","PeriodicalId":16796,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","volume":"39 5","pages":"218-223"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10515972/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/87551225231196047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Inability to access and afford discharge oral antimicrobials may delay discharges or result in therapeutic failure. "Test-claims" have the potential to identify such barriers. Objective: This study evaluated discharge antimicrobial access and patient outcomes after implementation of a standardized, inpatient pharmacist-initiated antimicrobial discharge medication cost inquiry (aDMCI) process. Methods: This was an Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved, pilot retrospective cohort study that included adults admitted for ≥72 hours from November 1, 2018, to February 28, 2019, and discharged on oral antimicrobials. Patients with a cost inquiry (aDMCI group) were compared with those without (standard-of-care, SOC, group). Primary endpoint was discharge delay. Secondary endpoints included percentage of patients discharged on suboptimal antimicrobials and medication errors from aDMCI. Results: 84 patients were included: 43 in SOC and 41 in aDMCI. Seventy-five antimicrobial cost inquiries were evaluated among 41 patients. There were no discharge delays or medication errors associated with the standardized "test-claim" (aDMCI) workflow. Patients in the SOC group had a greater Charlson Comorbidity Index (4 [2-6] vs 2 [1-4], P =0.004), were more likely to be immunosuppressed (24, 56% vs 12, 29%; P =0.014), and had longer hospitalization (8 [5-15] vs 6 [5-9] days, P =0.026). Primary access barriers were prior-authorization (8, 11%) and associated with linezolid and moxifloxacin cost inquiries. Most aDMCIs results were available in <24 hours (66, 88%). Conclusions: The aDMCI process is safe and offers an actionable transition of care tool that can identify barriers to accessing discharge medications while insulating patients from surprise out-of-pocket cost.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
药剂师发起的标准化“测试索赔”工作流程对获得出院抗菌药物的预期障碍的影响。
背景:无法获得和提供出院口服抗菌药物可能会延迟出院或导致治疗失败。“测试声明”有可能识别此类障碍。目的:本研究评估了实施标准化、住院药剂师发起的抗菌出院药物成本调查(aDMCI)流程后的出院抗菌药物使用情况和患者结果。方法:这是一项机构审查委员会(IRB)批准的试点回顾性队列研究,包括2018年11月1日至2019年2月28日入院≥72小时并服用口服抗菌药物出院的成年人。将进行成本调查的患者(aDMCI组)与未进行成本调查(标准护理、SOC组)进行比较。主要终点是出院延迟。次要终点包括使用次优抗菌药物出院的患者百分比和aDMCI的用药错误。结果:84例患者包括:SOC 43例,aDMCI 41例。在41名患者中评估了75项抗菌药物成本调查。没有与标准化“测试索赔”(aDMCI)工作流程相关的出院延迟或用药错误。SOC组患者的Charlson合并症指数更高(4[2-6]vs 2[1-4],P=0.004),更容易受到免疫抑制(2456%vs 1229%;P=0.014),住院时间更长(8[5-15]vs 6[5-9]天,P=0.026)。主要的进入障碍是事先授权(8.11%),并与利奈唑胺和莫西沙星的费用查询有关。结论中提供了大多数aDMCI结果:aDMCI过程是安全的,并提供了一种可操作的护理过渡工具,可以识别获得出院药物的障碍,同时使患者免受意外的自付费用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Pharmacy Technology
Journal of Pharmacy Technology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊介绍: For both pharmacists and technicians, jPT provides valuable information for those interested in the entire body of pharmacy practice. jPT covers new drugs, products, and equipment; therapeutic trends; organizational, legal, and educational activities; drug distribution and administration; and includes continuing education articles.
期刊最新文献
Short-Course Therapy for Uncomplicated VRE Bacteremia: This is Us Trying (to Shorten Therapy). An Analysis of Initial Loop Diuretic Dosing Strategies and Its Association with Time to Decongestion. Treatment of Histoplasmosis With Posaconazole in the Setting of a Severe Itraconazole Hypersensitivity Reaction: A Case Report. Pharmacological Management of Agitation in Hospitalized Elderly Patients: Evaluating Appropriateness and Standard Practices. Clesrovimab for the Prevention of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Lower Respiratory Tract Disease in Infants.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1