You are not lab rats at teaching hospitals: A systematic review of resident and fellow participation leads to improved colonoscopy

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-21 DOI:10.1111/jebm.12554
Chenyu Sun, Yue Chen, Shaodi Ma, Mengqing Liu, Vicky Yau, Na Hyun Kim, Sujatha Kailas, Scott Lowe, Rachel Bentley, Shuya Chen, Jie Liu, Muzi Meng, Yuting Huang, Qin Zhou, Yuyan Wu
{"title":"You are not lab rats at teaching hospitals: A systematic review of resident and fellow participation leads to improved colonoscopy","authors":"Chenyu Sun,&nbsp;Yue Chen,&nbsp;Shaodi Ma,&nbsp;Mengqing Liu,&nbsp;Vicky Yau,&nbsp;Na Hyun Kim,&nbsp;Sujatha Kailas,&nbsp;Scott Lowe,&nbsp;Rachel Bentley,&nbsp;Shuya Chen,&nbsp;Jie Liu,&nbsp;Muzi Meng,&nbsp;Yuting Huang,&nbsp;Qin Zhou,&nbsp;Yuyan Wu","doi":"10.1111/jebm.12554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Participation in colonoscopies is an essential aspect of endoscopic training. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of fellow/trainee participation on colonoscopy outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This meta-analysis was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). From database inception to July 2022, studies investigating fellow involvement and colonoscopy outcomes were searched across Cochrane library, PubMed, and other databases. The random-effects model was applied to generate more conservative estimates. Sensitive analysis was conducted to explore whether the result would depend on a particular study. Egger's test and Begg's test were used to estimate the potential for publication bias.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Seventeen studies including 30,062 participants were included. We found that fellow/trainee involvement enhanced the overall rates of adenoma detection and polyp detection (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.14–1.40, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.02–1.63, <i>p</i> = 0.020, respectively). The mean number of adenoma/polyps per colonoscopy was also higher with fellow/trainee participation (MD = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.08–0.17, <i>p</i> &lt; 0.001; MD = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.02–0.28, <i>p</i> = 0.020, respectively).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>In addition to its educational purpose, fellow or trainee involvement is associated with beneficial effects on colonoscopy outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":16090,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jebm.12554","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Participation in colonoscopies is an essential aspect of endoscopic training. The purpose of this study was to explore the impact of fellow/trainee participation on colonoscopy outcomes.

Methods

This meta-analysis was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO). From database inception to July 2022, studies investigating fellow involvement and colonoscopy outcomes were searched across Cochrane library, PubMed, and other databases. The random-effects model was applied to generate more conservative estimates. Sensitive analysis was conducted to explore whether the result would depend on a particular study. Egger's test and Begg's test were used to estimate the potential for publication bias.

Results

Seventeen studies including 30,062 participants were included. We found that fellow/trainee involvement enhanced the overall rates of adenoma detection and polyp detection (OR = 1.26, 95% CI = 1.14–1.40, p < 0.001; OR = 1.29, 95% CI = 1.02–1.63, p = 0.020, respectively). The mean number of adenoma/polyps per colonoscopy was also higher with fellow/trainee participation (MD = 0.12, 95% CI = 0.08–0.17, p < 0.001; MD = 0.15, 95% CI = 0.02–0.28, p = 0.020, respectively).

Conclusion

In addition to its educational purpose, fellow or trainee involvement is associated with beneficial effects on colonoscopy outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
你不是教学医院的实验鼠:对住院医生和同事的参与进行系统审查,可以改善结肠镜检查。
背景:参与结肠镜检查是内镜培训的一个重要方面。本研究的目的是探讨同事/实习生参与对结肠镜检查结果的影响。方法:该荟萃分析在国际前瞻性系统评价登记册(PROSPERO)上登记。从数据库建立到2022年7月,在Cochrane图书馆、PubMed和其他数据库中搜索了调查同事参与情况和结肠镜检查结果的研究。随机效应模型被用于产生更保守的估计。进行了敏感性分析,以探讨结果是否取决于特定的研究。Egger检验和Begg检验用于估计发表偏倚的可能性。结果:17项研究包括30062名参与者。我们发现,同事/受训人员的参与提高了腺瘤检测和息肉检测的总体率(OR=1.26,95%CI=1.14-1.40,p结论:除了教育目的外,同事或受训人员的介入还与结肠镜检查结果的有益影响有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine
Journal of Evidence‐Based Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
1.40%
发文量
42
期刊介绍: The Journal of Evidence-Based Medicine (EMB) is an esteemed international healthcare and medical decision-making journal, dedicated to publishing groundbreaking research outcomes in evidence-based decision-making, research, practice, and education. Serving as the official English-language journal of the Cochrane China Centre and West China Hospital of Sichuan University, we eagerly welcome editorials, commentaries, and systematic reviews encompassing various topics such as clinical trials, policy, drug and patient safety, education, and knowledge translation.
期刊最新文献
Evaluation and management of knee osteoarthritis. Issue Information Diagnosis and management of inflammatory bowel disease The Guidelines for use and promotion of low sodium salt in China The ethics of some placebo-controlled randomized controlled trials
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1