Trauma, risk, and resilience: A qualitative study of mental health in post-conflict Liberia.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY Transcultural Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2023-09-20 DOI:10.1177/13634615231191992
Manasi Sharma, Allison Backman, Oriana Vesga-Lopez, Lazaro Zayas, Benjamin Harris, David C Henderson, Karestan C Koenen, David R Williams, Christina P C Borba
{"title":"Trauma, risk, and resilience: A qualitative study of mental health in post-conflict Liberia.","authors":"Manasi Sharma, Allison Backman, Oriana Vesga-Lopez, Lazaro Zayas, Benjamin Harris, David C Henderson, Karestan C Koenen, David R Williams, Christina P C Borba","doi":"10.1177/13634615231191992","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Liberian civil wars led to widespread destruction and devastation for its individuals, communities, and economy. However, individuals' subjective trauma experiences and long-term psychological impact remain relatively understudied. This study aims to explore context-specific traumatic events and examine how risk and protective factors combine with traumas to influence trajectories of suffering and recovery over time. We conducted 43 semi-structured interviews with Liberian adults who were present during the Liberian civil wars, and we used line-by-line open coding, thematic analysis, and axial coding to analyze and contextualize the data. Eight key trauma themes emerged: Abuse (emotional, physical, and sexual), Captivity, Combat, Killings, Physical Illness, Resource Loss, Family Separation, and War Environment. The risk and protective factors that were reported as salient were: Age, Biological Sex, Socioeconomic Status, and Community Support. Further, key patterns emerged across interviews that indicated greater risk for long-term suffering: 1) exposure to multiple traumatic events, 2) certain types of traumatic events (like killing of a close family member), and 3) the combination of specific traumatic events and risk and protective factors (like older women witnessing the killing of their children). This study provides culturally relevant information on trauma, suffering, and resilience in post-conflict Liberia, with the aim of guiding the development of screening tools and targeted psychological interventions that improve well-being over time.</p>","PeriodicalId":47864,"journal":{"name":"Transcultural Psychiatry","volume":" ","pages":"652-667"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transcultural Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13634615231191992","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/9/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Liberian civil wars led to widespread destruction and devastation for its individuals, communities, and economy. However, individuals' subjective trauma experiences and long-term psychological impact remain relatively understudied. This study aims to explore context-specific traumatic events and examine how risk and protective factors combine with traumas to influence trajectories of suffering and recovery over time. We conducted 43 semi-structured interviews with Liberian adults who were present during the Liberian civil wars, and we used line-by-line open coding, thematic analysis, and axial coding to analyze and contextualize the data. Eight key trauma themes emerged: Abuse (emotional, physical, and sexual), Captivity, Combat, Killings, Physical Illness, Resource Loss, Family Separation, and War Environment. The risk and protective factors that were reported as salient were: Age, Biological Sex, Socioeconomic Status, and Community Support. Further, key patterns emerged across interviews that indicated greater risk for long-term suffering: 1) exposure to multiple traumatic events, 2) certain types of traumatic events (like killing of a close family member), and 3) the combination of specific traumatic events and risk and protective factors (like older women witnessing the killing of their children). This study provides culturally relevant information on trauma, suffering, and resilience in post-conflict Liberia, with the aim of guiding the development of screening tools and targeted psychological interventions that improve well-being over time.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
创伤、风险和复原力:冲突后利比里亚心理健康的定性研究。
利比里亚内战对其个人、社区和经济造成了广泛的破坏和破坏。然而,个人的主观创伤经历和长期心理影响仍然相对缺乏研究。本研究旨在探索特定情境的创伤事件,并研究风险和保护因素如何与创伤相结合,随着时间的推移影响痛苦和康复的轨迹。我们对利比里亚内战期间在场的利比里亚成年人进行了43次半结构化采访,并使用逐行开放编码、主题分析和轴向编码对数据进行分析和背景化。出现了八个关键的创伤主题:虐待(情感、身体和性)、俘虏、战斗、杀戮、身体疾病、资源损失、家庭分离和战争环境。据报道,显著的风险和保护因素有:年龄、生物性别、社会经济状况和社区支持。此外,访谈中出现的关键模式表明,长期痛苦的风险更大:1)暴露于多种创伤事件,2)某些类型的创伤事件(如杀害亲密家庭成员),以及3)特定创伤事件与风险和保护因素的结合(如目睹子女被杀的老年妇女)。这项研究提供了关于冲突后利比里亚创伤、痛苦和复原力的文化相关信息,目的是指导开发筛查工具和有针对性的心理干预措施,随着时间的推移改善福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
12.00%
发文量
93
期刊介绍: Transcultural Psychiatry is a fully peer reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on cultural psychiatry and mental health. Cultural psychiatry is concerned with the social and cultural determinants of psychopathology and psychosocial treatments of the range of mental and behavioural problems in individuals, families and human groups. In addition to the clinical research methods of psychiatry, it draws from the disciplines of psychiatric epidemiology, medical anthropology and cross-cultural psychology.
期刊最新文献
Experiences of resettled Iraqi and Syrian refugee young people and families with a mental health triage and assessment service. Activist burnout in No Borders: The case of a highly diverse movement. Perceptions of youth internalizing symptoms: Cross-cultural comparisons between Taiwanese and U.S. mothers. Help-seeking intentions and depression treatment beliefs amongst Sri Lankan Australians: A survey following a mental health literacy framework. Is it pathological to believe conspiracy theories?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1