Brazilian Medical Survey on Telemedicine since the onset of COVID-19.

IF 1.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Einstein-Sao Paulo Pub Date : 2023-09-15 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.31744/einstein_journal/2023AE0428
Eduardo Cordioli, Mara Giavina-Bianchi, Carlos Henrique Sartorato Pedrotti, Sérgio Podgaec
{"title":"Brazilian Medical Survey on Telemedicine since the onset of COVID-19.","authors":"Eduardo Cordioli,&nbsp;Mara Giavina-Bianchi,&nbsp;Carlos Henrique Sartorato Pedrotti,&nbsp;Sérgio Podgaec","doi":"10.31744/einstein_journal/2023AE0428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary aim of this study was to understand the difference in the use of Telemedicine by Brazilian physicians before and after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic and their intention to continue using it post the pandemic period. The secondary objective was to analyze the differences of opinion between physicians in the private and public sectors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an online medical survey through the SurveyMonkey platform in a large hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, from May to July 2022.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three-hundred-and -two physicians responded to the survey. We found that there was a significant increase in the number of physicians who started using Telemedicine in both the public and private sectors (p<0.0001) since the onset of COVID-19 pandemic and that >50% of them intend to continue using Telemedicine in their daily practice. Most responders consider that Telemedicine is useful in screening, diagnosis and management of patients; that it facilitates the physician's daily practice; that it can maintain or even add financial gains through reducing office expenses; and that is another medium for dispensing medical care. They also believe that Telemedicine should be regulated by the Brazilian Federal Council of Medicine. There were no significant differences between the responses from private and public sector physicians.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Telemedicine has played a major role in healthcare since the onset of COVID-19 pandemic and most of the physicians approve its use and intend to continue using Telemedicine in their daily practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":47359,"journal":{"name":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10501763/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Einstein-Sao Paulo","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31744/einstein_journal/2023AE0428","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The primary aim of this study was to understand the difference in the use of Telemedicine by Brazilian physicians before and after the onset of COVID-19 pandemic and their intention to continue using it post the pandemic period. The secondary objective was to analyze the differences of opinion between physicians in the private and public sectors.

Methods: We conducted an online medical survey through the SurveyMonkey platform in a large hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, from May to July 2022.

Results: Three-hundred-and -two physicians responded to the survey. We found that there was a significant increase in the number of physicians who started using Telemedicine in both the public and private sectors (p<0.0001) since the onset of COVID-19 pandemic and that >50% of them intend to continue using Telemedicine in their daily practice. Most responders consider that Telemedicine is useful in screening, diagnosis and management of patients; that it facilitates the physician's daily practice; that it can maintain or even add financial gains through reducing office expenses; and that is another medium for dispensing medical care. They also believe that Telemedicine should be regulated by the Brazilian Federal Council of Medicine. There were no significant differences between the responses from private and public sector physicians.

Conclusion: Telemedicine has played a major role in healthcare since the onset of COVID-19 pandemic and most of the physicians approve its use and intend to continue using Telemedicine in their daily practice.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎发病以来巴西远程医疗医学调查。
目的:本研究的主要目的是了解巴西医生在新冠肺炎大流行前后使用远程医疗的差异,以及他们在大流行后继续使用远程医疗。第二个目的是分析私营和公共部门医生之间的意见分歧。方法:2022年5月至7月,我们通过SurveyMonkey平台在巴西圣保罗的一家大型医院进行了一项在线医学调查。结果:322名医生对调查做出了回应。我们发现,在公共和私营部门,开始使用远程医疗的医生数量显著增加(p50%的受访者打算在日常实践中继续使用远程医疗。大多数受访者认为远程医疗在筛查、诊断和管理患者方面很有用;它有助于医生的日常实践;它可以通过减少办公室开支来维持甚至增加经济收益;这是另一种提供医疗服务的媒介emedicine应由巴西联邦医学委员会监管。私营部门和公共部门医生的回答没有显著差异。结论:自新冠肺炎大流行开始以来,远程医疗在医疗保健中发挥了重要作用,大多数医生批准使用远程医疗,并打算在日常实践中继续使用远程医疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Einstein-Sao Paulo
Einstein-Sao Paulo MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
210
审稿时长
38 weeks
期刊最新文献
Point prevalence and risk factors for pressure ulcers in hospitalized adult patients: a cross-sectional study. Swimming training prevents obesity installation and normalizes hypothalamic expressions of GLP1 and leptin receptors in adult offspring born in small litters. Prevalence and risk factors of Burnout syndrome among intensive care unit members during the second wave of COVID-19: a single-center study. Current status of laparoscopy teaching in gynecology and obstetrics medical residency in Brazil. Comparison of the effects of high-flow nasal cannula and bilevel positive airway pressure treatments as respiratory physiotherapy interventions for children with asthma exacerbation: a randomized clinical trial.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1