Feasibility and Acceptability of an INtervention TO Increase MOBility in Older Hospitalized Medical Patients (INTOMOB): A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.

IF 2.1 Q3 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine Pub Date : 2023-09-30 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23337214231202148
Dominique Bergsma, Claudia Panait, Pascal Leist, Blandine Mooser, Lynn Pantano, Fabian D Liechti, Jenny Gentizon, Christine Baumgartner, Marco Mancinetti, Marie Méan, Joachim M Schmidt Leuenberger, Carole E Aubert
{"title":"Feasibility and Acceptability of an INtervention TO Increase MOBility in Older Hospitalized Medical Patients (INTOMOB): A Mixed-Methods Pilot Study.","authors":"Dominique Bergsma,&nbsp;Claudia Panait,&nbsp;Pascal Leist,&nbsp;Blandine Mooser,&nbsp;Lynn Pantano,&nbsp;Fabian D Liechti,&nbsp;Jenny Gentizon,&nbsp;Christine Baumgartner,&nbsp;Marco Mancinetti,&nbsp;Marie Méan,&nbsp;Joachim M Schmidt Leuenberger,&nbsp;Carole E Aubert","doi":"10.1177/23337214231202148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> To reduce adverse outcomes of low hospital mobility, we need interventions that are scalable in everyday practice. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of the INTOMOB multilevel intervention addressing barriers to hospital mobility without requiring unavailable resources. <b>Methods:</b> The INTOMOB intervention, targeting older patients, healthcare professionals (HCPs) and the hospital environment, was implemented on acute general internal medicine wards of three hospitals (12/2022-03/2023). Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention were assessed and two types of accelerometers compared in a mixed methods study (patient and HCP surveys and interviews). Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and qualitative data using a deductive approach. Results were integrated through meta-inferences. <b>Results:</b> Of 20 patients (mean age 74.1 years), 90% found the intervention helpful and 82% said the environment intervention (posters) stimulated mobility. The majority of 44 HCPs described the intervention as clear and helpful. There was no major implementation or technical issue. About 60% of patients and HCPs preferred a wrist-worn over an ankle-worn accelerometer. <b>Conclusions:</b> The INTOMOB intervention is feasible and well accepted. Patients' and HCPs' feedback allowed to further improve the intervention that will be tested in a cluster randomized trial and provides useful information for future mobility-fostering interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":52146,"journal":{"name":"Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/17/5e/10.1177_23337214231202148.PMC10542323.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23337214231202148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: To reduce adverse outcomes of low hospital mobility, we need interventions that are scalable in everyday practice. This study assessed the feasibility and acceptability of the INTOMOB multilevel intervention addressing barriers to hospital mobility without requiring unavailable resources. Methods: The INTOMOB intervention, targeting older patients, healthcare professionals (HCPs) and the hospital environment, was implemented on acute general internal medicine wards of three hospitals (12/2022-03/2023). Feasibility and acceptability of the intervention were assessed and two types of accelerometers compared in a mixed methods study (patient and HCP surveys and interviews). Quantitative data were analyzed descriptively and qualitative data using a deductive approach. Results were integrated through meta-inferences. Results: Of 20 patients (mean age 74.1 years), 90% found the intervention helpful and 82% said the environment intervention (posters) stimulated mobility. The majority of 44 HCPs described the intervention as clear and helpful. There was no major implementation or technical issue. About 60% of patients and HCPs preferred a wrist-worn over an ankle-worn accelerometer. Conclusions: The INTOMOB intervention is feasible and well accepted. Patients' and HCPs' feedback allowed to further improve the intervention that will be tested in a cluster randomized trial and provides useful information for future mobility-fostering interventions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高老年住院患者MOBILLY的干预措施(INTOMOB)的可行性和可接受性:一项混合方法的初步研究。
背景:为了减少医院流动性低的不良后果,我们需要在日常实践中可扩展的干预措施。本研究评估了INTOMOB多级干预的可行性和可接受性,该干预在不需要不可用资源的情况下解决医院流动障碍。方法:在三家医院的急诊普通内科病房(12/2022-03/2023)实施针对老年患者、医护人员和医院环境的INTOMOB干预。在一项混合方法研究(患者和HCP调查和访谈)中,评估了干预的可行性和可接受性,并比较了两种类型的加速度计。定量数据采用描述性分析法,定性数据采用演绎法。结果通过元推断进行整合。结果:20名患者(平均年龄74.1 年),90%的人认为干预有帮助,82%的人认为环境干预(海报)刺激了流动性。44名HCP中的大多数人认为干预措施明确且有益。没有重大的实施或技术问题。大约60%的患者和HCP更喜欢佩戴手腕而不是脚踝佩戴的加速计。结论:INTOMOB介入治疗是可行的,并且被广泛接受。患者和HCP的反馈可以进一步改进将在集群随机试验中测试的干预措施,并为未来的行动能力培养干预措施提供有用的信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine
Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine Medicine-Geriatrics and Gerontology
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
3.70%
发文量
119
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Gerontology and Geriatric Medicine (GGM) is an interdisciplinary, peer-reviewed open access journal where scholars from a variety of disciplines present their work focusing on the psychological, behavioral, social, and biological aspects of aging, and public health services and research related to aging. The journal addresses a wide variety of topics related to health services research in gerontology and geriatrics. GGM seeks to be one of the world’s premier Open Access outlets for gerontological academic research. As such, GGM does not limit content due to page budgets or thematic significance. Papers will be subjected to rigorous peer review but will be selected solely on the basis of whether the research is sound and deserves publication. By virtue of not restricting papers to a narrow discipline, GGM facilitates the discovery of the connections between papers.
期刊最新文献
Comparison of Quantile Regression and Gaussian (Z-scores) Percentiles to BSA in Growth Charts With a Pakistani Population. Risk Factor Analysis in Patients Exhibiting Cerebral Microbleeds and the Correlation with Cognitive Impairment. A Novel Protocol for the Early Detection of COVID-19 at a Skilled Nursing Facility. Understanding Pandemic Increases in Long-Stay Psychotropic Prescribing for Dementia Symptoms: A Survey of Nursing Home Clinicians. Patient Autonomy Versus Intervention: Geriatric Care Dilemmas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1