Defining comprehensiveness in primary care: a scoping review.

IF 1.1 Q4 PRIMARY HEALTH CARE Journal of primary health care Pub Date : 2023-09-01 DOI:10.1071/HC23067
Derek Baughman, Rafay Nasir, Lynda Ngo, Andrew Bazemore
{"title":"Defining comprehensiveness in primary care: a scoping review.","authors":"Derek Baughman,&nbsp;Rafay Nasir,&nbsp;Lynda Ngo,&nbsp;Andrew Bazemore","doi":"10.1071/HC23067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Introduction The term comprehensiveness was introduced into the literature as early as the 1960s and is regarded as a core attribute of primary care. Although comprehensive care is a primary care research priority encompassing patient and provider experience, cost, and health outcomes, there has been a lack of focus on consolidating existing definitions. Aim To unify definitions of comprehensiveness in primary care. Methods The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was followed, hierarchically filtering 'comprehensiveness' MeSH terms and literature-defined affiliated terms. Snowballing methods were used to include additional literature from known experts. Articles were systematically reviewed with a three-clinician team. Results The initial search populated 679 607 articles, of which 25 were included. Identified key terms include: whole-person care (WPC), range of services, and referral to specialty care. WPC is the extent which primary care physicians (PCPs) consider the physical, emotional, and social aspects of a patient's health. It has been shown to positively impact clinical costs and outcomes, satisfaction, and trust. Range of services encompasses most health problems to reduce unnecessary spending on specialty care and promote continuity. Referral to specialty care is utilized when PCPs cannot provide the necessary services - balancing depth and breadth of care with the limitations of primary care scope. Discussion This scoping review unified the interrelatedness of comprehensiveness's main aspects - whole-person care, range of services, and referral to specialty care - framing a working, evidence-based definition: managing most medical care needs and temporarily complementing care with special integrated services in the context of patient's values, preferences, and beliefs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16855,"journal":{"name":"Journal of primary health care","volume":"15 3","pages":"253-261"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of primary health care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1071/HC23067","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PRIMARY HEALTH CARE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction The term comprehensiveness was introduced into the literature as early as the 1960s and is regarded as a core attribute of primary care. Although comprehensive care is a primary care research priority encompassing patient and provider experience, cost, and health outcomes, there has been a lack of focus on consolidating existing definitions. Aim To unify definitions of comprehensiveness in primary care. Methods The PRISMA extension for scoping reviews was followed, hierarchically filtering 'comprehensiveness' MeSH terms and literature-defined affiliated terms. Snowballing methods were used to include additional literature from known experts. Articles were systematically reviewed with a three-clinician team. Results The initial search populated 679 607 articles, of which 25 were included. Identified key terms include: whole-person care (WPC), range of services, and referral to specialty care. WPC is the extent which primary care physicians (PCPs) consider the physical, emotional, and social aspects of a patient's health. It has been shown to positively impact clinical costs and outcomes, satisfaction, and trust. Range of services encompasses most health problems to reduce unnecessary spending on specialty care and promote continuity. Referral to specialty care is utilized when PCPs cannot provide the necessary services - balancing depth and breadth of care with the limitations of primary care scope. Discussion This scoping review unified the interrelatedness of comprehensiveness's main aspects - whole-person care, range of services, and referral to specialty care - framing a working, evidence-based definition: managing most medical care needs and temporarily complementing care with special integrated services in the context of patient's values, preferences, and beliefs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
界定初级保健的全面性:范围界定审查。
引言“全面性”一词早在20世纪60年代就被引入文献,被视为初级保健的核心属性。尽管综合护理是初级保健研究的优先事项,包括患者和提供者的经验、成本和健康结果,但缺乏对整合现有定义的关注。目的统一初级保健全面性的定义。方法遵循PRISMA范围界定审查扩展,分层筛选“全面性”MeSH术语和文献定义的附属术语。滚雪球法被用于纳入已知专家的额外文献。由三名临床医生组成的团队对文章进行了系统的审查。结果初始搜索填充679 607篇文章,其中包括25篇。已确定的关键术语包括:全人护理(WPC)、服务范围和专科护理转诊。WPC是初级保健医生(PCP)考虑患者健康的身体、情感和社会方面的程度。它已被证明对临床成本和结果、满意度和信任有积极影响。服务范围涵盖了大多数健康问题,以减少专业护理的不必要支出并促进连续性。当PCP无法提供必要的服务时,会使用转诊到专科护理——在护理的深度和广度与初级护理范围的限制之间取得平衡。讨论这一范围审查统一了全面性的主要方面——全人护理、服务范围和转诊到专科护理——的相互关系,制定了一个有效的、基于证据的定义:在患者的价值观、偏好和信仰的背景下,管理大多数医疗护理需求,并暂时用特殊的综合服务补充护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of primary health care
Journal of primary health care PRIMARY HEALTH CARE-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
79
审稿时长
28 weeks
期刊最新文献
A supported primary health pathway for mild traumatic brain injury quality improvement report. Can SSRI's help women suffering with PMS? Checklists for assessing ethical aspects of health technologies and services. Comfort with having sexual orientation recorded on official databases among a community and online sample of gay and bisexual men in Aotearoa New Zealand. Ethical assessment of virtual consultation services: application of a practical ethical checklist to direct-to-consumer services in Aotearoa New Zealand.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1