Epidemiology of Maternal Nutritional Status and Risk of Adverse Birth Outcomes in Undernourished Mothers with Sickle Cell Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol.

IF 2.3 Q3 BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS Methods and Protocols Pub Date : 2023-09-17 DOI:10.3390/mps6050088
Lauren J Klein, John Benaiah Ayete-Nyampong, Annette M Williams, Lori A Harding, Samuel A Oppong, Sari Acra, Michael R DeBaun, Aamer Imdad
{"title":"Epidemiology of Maternal Nutritional Status and Risk of Adverse Birth Outcomes in Undernourished Mothers with Sickle Cell Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol.","authors":"Lauren J Klein, John Benaiah Ayete-Nyampong, Annette M Williams, Lori A Harding, Samuel A Oppong, Sari Acra, Michael R DeBaun, Aamer Imdad","doi":"10.3390/mps6050088","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In pregnancies complicated by sickle cell disease (SCD), the maternal-fetal dyad is at high risk for mortality and morbidity. In healthy pregnancies, maternal nutritional status is a critical factor for the healthy growth and development of the fetus. However, there are no reviews of the current research on the nutritional status of pregnant women with SCD and pregnancy outcomes. First, we aim to assess the burden of malnutrition in pregnant women with SCD. Next, we aim to systematically evaluate if pregnant women with SCD who have poor nutritional status are at increased risk for adverse birth outcomes compared to pregnant women with sickle cell disease and normal nutritional status. We will systematically search multiple electronic databases. Our exposure is pregnant women with SCD and poor nutritional status. The primary outcomes of interest include low birth weight (categorical) and birth weight z-scores (continuous). We will also evaluate maternal and perinatal outcomes as secondary outcomes. We will evaluate the risk of bias and overall certainty of evidence with Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I), and the overall evidence will be assessed using Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. We will pool findings with a meta-analysis if sufficient homogeneity exists among studies. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated to SCD advocacy groups. PROSPERO registration number: 429412.</p>","PeriodicalId":18715,"journal":{"name":"Methods and Protocols","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10514847/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methods and Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/mps6050088","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOCHEMICAL RESEARCH METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In pregnancies complicated by sickle cell disease (SCD), the maternal-fetal dyad is at high risk for mortality and morbidity. In healthy pregnancies, maternal nutritional status is a critical factor for the healthy growth and development of the fetus. However, there are no reviews of the current research on the nutritional status of pregnant women with SCD and pregnancy outcomes. First, we aim to assess the burden of malnutrition in pregnant women with SCD. Next, we aim to systematically evaluate if pregnant women with SCD who have poor nutritional status are at increased risk for adverse birth outcomes compared to pregnant women with sickle cell disease and normal nutritional status. We will systematically search multiple electronic databases. Our exposure is pregnant women with SCD and poor nutritional status. The primary outcomes of interest include low birth weight (categorical) and birth weight z-scores (continuous). We will also evaluate maternal and perinatal outcomes as secondary outcomes. We will evaluate the risk of bias and overall certainty of evidence with Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I), and the overall evidence will be assessed using Grading of Recommendation Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) criteria. We will pool findings with a meta-analysis if sufficient homogeneity exists among studies. Findings will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and disseminated to SCD advocacy groups. PROSPERO registration number: 429412.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
镰状细胞病营养不良母亲营养状况和不良出生结局风险的流行病学:系统综述和荟萃分析方案。
在合并镰状细胞病(SCD)的妊娠中,母婴二人组的死亡率和发病率很高。在健康妊娠中,母亲的营养状况是胎儿健康生长发育的关键因素。然而,目前对患有SCD的孕妇的营养状况和妊娠结局的研究没有综述。首先,我们旨在评估SCD孕妇营养不良的负担。接下来,我们的目标是系统地评估营养状况不佳的SCD孕妇与患有镰状细胞病和营养状况正常的孕妇相比,不良分娩结果的风险是否增加。我们将系统地搜索多个电子数据库。我们的接触对象是患有SCD和营养不良的孕妇。感兴趣的主要结果包括低出生体重(分类)和出生体重z评分(连续)。我们还将把孕产妇和围产期结果作为次要结果进行评估。我们将在非随机干预研究(ROBINS-I)中评估偏倚风险和证据的总体确定性,并使用建议评估、发展和评估分级(GRADE)标准评估总体证据。如果研究之间存在足够的同质性,我们将把研究结果与荟萃分析结合起来。研究结果将发表在同行评审期刊上,并分发给SCD倡导团体。PROSPERO注册号:429412。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Methods and Protocols
Methods and Protocols Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
85
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
eDNA-Based Survey of Fish Species in Water Bodies Using Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) for Application of Developing Automatic Sampler. Activity Identification, Classification, and Representation of Wheelchair Sport Court Tasks: A Method Proposal. Validity and Reliability According to the Type of Examiners in the Process of Calibrating Dental Caries Experience Using the DMFT Index. A Versatile Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography-Full-Scan High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry Method to Quantify Wine Polyphenols. Evaluating Age-Friendly Health Care Approaches in Rural Primary Care Settings: A Multi-Case, Mixed-Methods Hybrid Type 2 Effectiveness-Implementation Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1