Knowledge Mediates the Effects of Game Changers for Cervical Cancer Prevention (GC-CCP) Intervention on Increased VIA Screening Advocacy in Uganda.

Glenn J Wagner, Joseph K B Matovu, Margrethe Juncker, Eve Namisango, Jolly Beyeza-Kashesya, Rhoda K Wanyenze
{"title":"Knowledge Mediates the Effects of Game Changers for Cervical Cancer Prevention (GC-CCP) Intervention on Increased VIA Screening Advocacy in Uganda.","authors":"Glenn J Wagner, Joseph K B Matovu, Margrethe Juncker, Eve Namisango, Jolly Beyeza-Kashesya, Rhoda K Wanyenze","doi":"10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-23-0262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Game Changers for Cervical Cancer Prevention (GC-CCP), a group advocacy training intervention, has been shown to increase cervical cancer prevention and screening advocacy. In this secondary analysis, we examined mediators and moderators of this effect. A randomized controlled trial of GC-CCP-a 7-session, peer led intervention designed to empower women to engage in cervical cancer prevention advocacy-was conducted with women who had recently been screened by visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid for cervical cancer. Participants were assessed at baseline and month 6 follow-up. Cervical cancer-related constructs targeted by the intervention were examined as mediators using multivariate linear regression analysis. Individual and social network characteristics were examined as moderators. Change in cervical cancer knowledge fully mediated the intervention effect on increased cervical cancer prevention advocacy; change in cervical cancer risk management self-efficacy was a partial mediator. Moderators of the effect included no secondary education, having a main sex partner, and having trustworthy, supportive, non-stigmatizing peers. The effect of GC-CCP on cervical cancer prevention advocacy seems largely driven by its impact on cervical cancer knowledge, and the intervention may be most effective among women who are partnered, less educated, and have trusting, supportive social networks.</p><p><strong>Prevention relevance: </strong>Enhancing cervical cancer knowledge among women who have screened for cervical cancer is key to empowering these women to engage in cervical cancer prevention advocacy and acting as change agents for encouraging other women to screen.</p>","PeriodicalId":72514,"journal":{"name":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":"689-697"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10843060/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer prevention research (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-23-0262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Game Changers for Cervical Cancer Prevention (GC-CCP), a group advocacy training intervention, has been shown to increase cervical cancer prevention and screening advocacy. In this secondary analysis, we examined mediators and moderators of this effect. A randomized controlled trial of GC-CCP-a 7-session, peer led intervention designed to empower women to engage in cervical cancer prevention advocacy-was conducted with women who had recently been screened by visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid for cervical cancer. Participants were assessed at baseline and month 6 follow-up. Cervical cancer-related constructs targeted by the intervention were examined as mediators using multivariate linear regression analysis. Individual and social network characteristics were examined as moderators. Change in cervical cancer knowledge fully mediated the intervention effect on increased cervical cancer prevention advocacy; change in cervical cancer risk management self-efficacy was a partial mediator. Moderators of the effect included no secondary education, having a main sex partner, and having trustworthy, supportive, non-stigmatizing peers. The effect of GC-CCP on cervical cancer prevention advocacy seems largely driven by its impact on cervical cancer knowledge, and the intervention may be most effective among women who are partnered, less educated, and have trusting, supportive social networks.

Prevention relevance: Enhancing cervical cancer knowledge among women who have screened for cervical cancer is key to empowering these women to engage in cervical cancer prevention advocacy and acting as change agents for encouraging other women to screen.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
知识介导癌症预防游戏改变者(GC-CCP)干预对乌干达增加VIA筛查宣传的影响。
癌症预防游戏改变者(GC-CCP)是一种团体宣传培训干预措施,已被证明可以增加癌症预防和筛查宣传。在第二次分析中,我们考察了这种效应的中介和调节因子。GC-CCP的一项随机对照试验是一项为期7天、由同伴主导的干预措施,旨在增强女性参与CC预防宣传的能力。该试验对最近通过醋酸宫颈目视检查(VIA)筛查CC的女性进行了研究。参与者在基线和第6个月随访时进行了评估。使用多元线性回归分析,将干预所针对的CC相关构建体作为中介进行检查。个体和社会网络特征作为调节因素进行了研究。CC知识的变化充分介导了干预效果,增加了CC预防宣传;CC风险管理自我效能感的变化是部分中介因素。这种影响的调节因素包括没有受过中学教育,有一个主要的性伴侣,以及有值得信赖、支持、不污名化的同龄人。GC-CCP对CC预防宣传的影响似乎很大程度上是由其对CC知识的影响所驱动的,并且这种干预可能在有伴侣、受教育程度较低、拥有信任和支持性社交网络的女性中最有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bench-to-Bedside Evaluation of Sulforaphane/BroccoMax® on Fatty Acid Synthesis in Prostate Cancer. Tailoring Colorectal Cancer Risk Assessments by Comparing Model Performance and Custom Thresholds in a Predominantly Hispanic Cohort. Validation of a Clinical and Polygenic Risk Prediction Model for Ovarian Cancer in the Nurses' Health Study. Point-of-Care CagA Antibody Positivity and Its Association with Precancerous Gastric Changes. Uncovering the Red Flags: A Cross-Sectional Retrospective Case-Control Study on Predictors of Early-Onset Colorectal Cancer in a Multistate Community Health System.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1