Consensus on the assessment of systemic sclerosis-associated primary heart involvement: World Scleroderma Foundation/Heart Failure Association guidance on screening, diagnosis, and follow-up assessment.

IF 1.4 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders Pub Date : 2023-10-01 Epub Date: 2023-04-03 DOI:10.1177/23971983231163413
Cosimo Bruni, Maya H Buch, Aleksandra Djokovic, Giacomo De Luca, Raluca B Dumitru, Alessandro Giollo, Ilaria Galetti, Alexia Steelandt, Konstantinos Bratis, Yossra Atef Suliman, Ivan Milinkovic, Anna Baritussio, Ghadeer Hasan, Anastasia Xintarakou, Yohei Isomura, George Markousis-Mavrogenis, Sophie Mavrogeni, Luna Gargani, Alida Lp Caforio, Carsten Tschöpe, Arsen Ristic, Sven Plein, Elijah Behr, Yannick Allanore, Masataka Kuwana, Christopher P Denton, Daniel E Furst, Dinesh Khanna, Thomas Krieg, Renzo Marcolongo, Alessia Pepe, Oliver Distler, Petros Sfikakis, Petar Seferovic, Marco Matucci-Cerinic
{"title":"Consensus on the assessment of systemic sclerosis-associated primary heart involvement: World Scleroderma Foundation/Heart Failure Association guidance on screening, diagnosis, and follow-up assessment.","authors":"Cosimo Bruni, Maya H Buch, Aleksandra Djokovic, Giacomo De Luca, Raluca B Dumitru, Alessandro Giollo, Ilaria Galetti, Alexia Steelandt, Konstantinos Bratis, Yossra Atef Suliman, Ivan Milinkovic, Anna Baritussio, Ghadeer Hasan, Anastasia Xintarakou, Yohei Isomura, George Markousis-Mavrogenis, Sophie Mavrogeni, Luna Gargani, Alida Lp Caforio, Carsten Tschöpe, Arsen Ristic, Sven Plein, Elijah Behr, Yannick Allanore, Masataka Kuwana, Christopher P Denton, Daniel E Furst, Dinesh Khanna, Thomas Krieg, Renzo Marcolongo, Alessia Pepe, Oliver Distler, Petros Sfikakis, Petar Seferovic, Marco Matucci-Cerinic","doi":"10.1177/23971983231163413","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Heart involvement is a common problem in systemic sclerosis. Recently, a definition of systemic sclerosis primary heart involvement had been proposed. Our aim was to establish consensus guidance on the screening, diagnosis and follow-up of systemic sclerosis primary heart involvement patients.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic literature review was performed to investigate the tests used to evaluate heart involvement in systemic sclerosis. The extracted data were categorized into relevant domains (conventional radiology, electrocardiography, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, laboratory, and others) and presented to experts and one patient research partner, who discussed the data and added their opinion. This led to the formulation of overarching principles and guidance statements, then reviewed and voted on for agreement. Consensus was attained when the mean agreement was ⩾7/10 and of ⩾70% of voters.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 2650 publications, 168 met eligibility criteria; the data extracted were discussed over three meetings. Seven overarching principles and 10 guidance points were created, revised and voted on. The consensus highlighted the importance of patient counseling, differential diagnosis and multidisciplinary team management, as well as defining screening and diagnostic approaches. The initial core evaluation should integrate history, physical examination, rest electrocardiography, trans-thoracic echocardiography and standard serum cardiac biomarkers. Further investigations should be individually tailored and decided through a multidisciplinary management. The overall mean agreement was 9.1/10, with mean 93% of experts voting above 7/10.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This consensus-based guidance on screening, diagnosis and follow-up of systemic sclerosis primary heart involvement provides a foundation for standard of care and future feasibility studies that are ongoing to support its application in clinical practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":17036,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10515996/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Scleroderma and Related Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23971983231163413","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Heart involvement is a common problem in systemic sclerosis. Recently, a definition of systemic sclerosis primary heart involvement had been proposed. Our aim was to establish consensus guidance on the screening, diagnosis and follow-up of systemic sclerosis primary heart involvement patients.

Methods: A systematic literature review was performed to investigate the tests used to evaluate heart involvement in systemic sclerosis. The extracted data were categorized into relevant domains (conventional radiology, electrocardiography, echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, laboratory, and others) and presented to experts and one patient research partner, who discussed the data and added their opinion. This led to the formulation of overarching principles and guidance statements, then reviewed and voted on for agreement. Consensus was attained when the mean agreement was ⩾7/10 and of ⩾70% of voters.

Results: Among 2650 publications, 168 met eligibility criteria; the data extracted were discussed over three meetings. Seven overarching principles and 10 guidance points were created, revised and voted on. The consensus highlighted the importance of patient counseling, differential diagnosis and multidisciplinary team management, as well as defining screening and diagnostic approaches. The initial core evaluation should integrate history, physical examination, rest electrocardiography, trans-thoracic echocardiography and standard serum cardiac biomarkers. Further investigations should be individually tailored and decided through a multidisciplinary management. The overall mean agreement was 9.1/10, with mean 93% of experts voting above 7/10.

Conclusion: This consensus-based guidance on screening, diagnosis and follow-up of systemic sclerosis primary heart involvement provides a foundation for standard of care and future feasibility studies that are ongoing to support its application in clinical practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
系统性硬化症相关原发性心脏受累评估共识:世界硬皮病基金会/心力衰竭协会筛查、诊断和随访评估指南。
引言:心脏受累是系统性硬化症的常见问题。最近,有人提出了系统性硬化症原发性心脏受累的定义。我们的目的是为系统性硬化原发性心脏病患者的筛查、诊断和随访建立共识指导。方法:对系统性文献进行综述,研究用于评估系统性硬化症心脏受累的测试。提取的数据被分类到相关领域(常规放射学、心电图、超声心动图、心脏磁共振成像、实验室等),并提交给专家和一名患者研究伙伴,他们讨论了数据并补充了他们的意见。这导致制定了总体原则和指导声明,然后进行了审查并投票通过了协议。当平均同意率为7/10和70%的选民时,达成了共识。结果:在2650份出版物中,168份符合资格标准;提取的数据经过三次会议讨论。制定、修订并表决了七项总体原则和10个指导点。共识强调了患者咨询、鉴别诊断和多学科团队管理的重要性,以及确定筛查和诊断方法的重要性。初始核心评估应综合病史、体格检查、静息心电图、经胸超声心动图和标准血清心脏生物标志物。进一步的调查应单独进行,并通过多学科管理作出决定。总体平均一致性为9.1/10,平均93%的专家投票高于7/10。结论:这一基于共识的系统性硬化症原发性心脏病筛查、诊断和随访指南为标准护理和未来的可行性研究奠定了基础,这些研究正在进行中,以支持其在临床实践中的应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
期刊最新文献
Atypical morphoea, a herald of two malignancies: Lung adenocarcinoma and a neuroendocrine tumour. Changes in work and adequacy of financial resources during COVID-19 among people with systemic sclerosis: A Scleroderma Patient-centered Intervention Network study. Coronary artery calcification is prevalent in systemic sclerosis and is associated with adverse prognosis. N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide is associated with pulmonary hypertension or diastolic dysfunction in patients with systemic sclerosis: An Australian prospective cross-sectional study. Views of nutrition needs in patients with systemic sclerosis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1