SPOT/Dx Pilot Reanalysis and College of American Pathologists Proficiency Testing for KRAS and NRAS Demonstrate Excellent Laboratory Performance.

Ahmet Zehir, Valentina Nardi, Eric Q Konnick, Christina M Lockwood, Thomas A Long, Nikoletta Sidiropoulos, Rhona J Souers, Patricia Vasalos, Neal I Lindeman, Joel T Moncur
{"title":"SPOT/Dx Pilot Reanalysis and College of American Pathologists Proficiency Testing for KRAS and NRAS Demonstrate Excellent Laboratory Performance.","authors":"Ahmet Zehir, Valentina Nardi, Eric Q Konnick, Christina M Lockwood, Thomas A Long, Nikoletta Sidiropoulos, Rhona J Souers, Patricia Vasalos, Neal I Lindeman, Joel T Moncur","doi":"10.5858/arpa.2023-0322-CP","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context.—: </strong>The Sustainable Predictive Oncology Therapeutics and Diagnostics quality assurance pilot study (SPOT/Dx pilot) on molecular oncology next-generation sequencing (NGS) reportedly demonstrated performance limitations of NGS laboratory-developed tests, including discrepancies with a US Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic. The SPOT/Dx pilot methods differ from those used in proficiency testing (PT) programs.</p><p><strong>Objective.—: </strong>To reanalyze SPOT/Dx pilot data using PT program methods and compare to PT program data.Also see p. 136.</p><p><strong>Design.—: </strong>The College of American Pathologists (CAP) Molecular Oncology Committee reanalyzed SPOT/Dx pilot data applying PT program methods, adjusting for confounding conditions, and compared them to CAP NGS PT program performance (2019-2022).</p><p><strong>Results.—: </strong>Overall detection rates of KRAS and NRAS single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and multinucleotide variants (MNVs) by SPOT/Dx pilot laboratories were 96.8% (716 of 740) and 81.1% (129 of 159), respectively. In CAP PT programs, the overall detection rates for the same SNVs and MNVs were 97.2% (2671 of 2748) and 91.8% (1853 of 2019), respectively. In 2022, the overall detection rate for 5 KRAS and NRAS MNVs in CAP PT programs was 97.3% (1161 of 1193).</p><p><strong>Conclusions.—: </strong>CAP PT program data demonstrate that laboratories consistently have high detection rates for KRAS and NRAS variants. The SPOT/Dx pilot has multiple design and analytic differences with established PT programs. Reanalyzed pilot data that adjust for confounding conditions demonstrate that laboratories proficiently detect SNVs and less successfully detect rare to never-observed MNVs. The SPOT/Dx pilot results are not generalizable to all molecular oncology testing and should not be used to market products or change policy affecting all molecular oncology testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":93883,"journal":{"name":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5858/arpa.2023-0322-CP","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context.—: The Sustainable Predictive Oncology Therapeutics and Diagnostics quality assurance pilot study (SPOT/Dx pilot) on molecular oncology next-generation sequencing (NGS) reportedly demonstrated performance limitations of NGS laboratory-developed tests, including discrepancies with a US Food and Drug Administration-approved companion diagnostic. The SPOT/Dx pilot methods differ from those used in proficiency testing (PT) programs.

Objective.—: To reanalyze SPOT/Dx pilot data using PT program methods and compare to PT program data.Also see p. 136.

Design.—: The College of American Pathologists (CAP) Molecular Oncology Committee reanalyzed SPOT/Dx pilot data applying PT program methods, adjusting for confounding conditions, and compared them to CAP NGS PT program performance (2019-2022).

Results.—: Overall detection rates of KRAS and NRAS single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and multinucleotide variants (MNVs) by SPOT/Dx pilot laboratories were 96.8% (716 of 740) and 81.1% (129 of 159), respectively. In CAP PT programs, the overall detection rates for the same SNVs and MNVs were 97.2% (2671 of 2748) and 91.8% (1853 of 2019), respectively. In 2022, the overall detection rate for 5 KRAS and NRAS MNVs in CAP PT programs was 97.3% (1161 of 1193).

Conclusions.—: CAP PT program data demonstrate that laboratories consistently have high detection rates for KRAS and NRAS variants. The SPOT/Dx pilot has multiple design and analytic differences with established PT programs. Reanalyzed pilot data that adjust for confounding conditions demonstrate that laboratories proficiently detect SNVs and less successfully detect rare to never-observed MNVs. The SPOT/Dx pilot results are not generalizable to all molecular oncology testing and should not be used to market products or change policy affecting all molecular oncology testing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
SPOT/Dx Pilot再分析和美国病理学家学院KRAS和NRAS的能力测试证明了卓越的实验室性能。
上下文。--:据报道,关于分子肿瘤学下一代测序(NGS)的可持续预测肿瘤学治疗和诊断质量保证试点研究(SPOT/Dx试点)证明了NGS实验室开发的测试的性能局限性,包括与美国食品药品监督管理局批准的配套诊断的差异。SPOT/Dx试点方法与能力测试(PT)项目中使用的方法不同。目标。--:使用PT程序方法重新分析SPOT/Dx飞行员数据,并与PT程序数据进行比较。设计。--:美国病理学家学院(CAP)分子肿瘤学委员会应用PT程序方法重新分析了SPOT/Dx试点数据,调整了混杂条件,结果:SPOT/Dx中试实验室对KRAS和NRAS单核苷酸变异株(SNVs)和多核苷酸变异株(MNVs)的总体检测率分别为96.8%(716/740)和81.1%(129/159)。在CAP PT项目中,相同SNV和MNV的总体检测率分别为97.2%(2748例中的2671例)和91.8%(2019年的1853例)。2022年,CAP PT项目中5种KRAS和NRAS MNV的总体检测率为97.3%(1193例中有1161例)。结论:CAP PT项目数据表明,实验室对KRAS和NR变体的检测率一直很高。SPOT/Dx试点与已建立的PT项目在设计和分析方面存在多项差异。重新分析的飞行员数据调整了混杂条件,表明实验室能够熟练地检测SNV,而不太成功地检测罕见或从未观察到的MNV。SPOT/Dx试点结果不能推广到所有分子肿瘤学测试,也不应用于营销产品或改变影响所有分子肿瘤测试的政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lymphangioleiomyomatosis: A Review. Exploring the Incidence of Testicular Neoplasms in the Transgender Population: A Case Series. Global Pathology: A Snapshot of the Problems, the Progress, and the Potential. Pathologists Providing Direct Patient Care in Thoracic Transplant: Same Objective, Different Scope. The Impact of Pathologist Review on Peripheral Blood Smears: A College of American Pathologists Q-Probes Study of 22 Laboratories.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1