Predictors of health-related quality of life in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute severe respiratory failure.

IF 2.1 Q3 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Journal of the Intensive Care Society Pub Date : 2023-08-01 Epub Date: 2022-06-29 DOI:10.1177/17511437221111639
Ahmed Mham Mostafa, Christopher J Tuttle, Mikel A Mckie, Jo-Anne Fowles, Jasvir Parmar, Alain Vuylsteke
{"title":"Predictors of health-related quality of life in patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for acute severe respiratory failure.","authors":"Ahmed Mham Mostafa,&nbsp;Christopher J Tuttle,&nbsp;Mikel A Mckie,&nbsp;Jo-Anne Fowles,&nbsp;Jasvir Parmar,&nbsp;Alain Vuylsteke","doi":"10.1177/17511437221111639","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a form of life support used in severe respiratory failure. While the short-term complications of VV-ECMO are well described, impacts on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) are less well characterised. This study aims to assess the HRQOL of patients who underwent VV-ECMO for acute severe respiratory failure and explore predictors of poor HRQOL.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a retrospective, observational study of a large cohort of adults who underwent VV-ECMO for acute severe respiratory failure in a single tertiary centre (June 2013-March 2019). Patients surviving critical care discharge were invited to a six-month clinic, where they completed an EQ-5D-5L questionnaire assessing HRQOL. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess prognostic factors for HRQOL.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 245 consecutive patients included in this study (median age 45 years), 187 (76.3%) survived until ECMO decannulation and 172 (70.2%) until hospital discharge. Of those, 98 (57.3%) attended a follow-up clinic at a mean (±SD) of 204 (±45) days post-discharge. Patients reported problems with pain/discomfort (56%), usual daily activities (53%), anxiety/depression (49%), mobility (46%), and personal care (21%). Multivariate analysis identified limb ischaemia (-0.266, 95% C.I. [-0.116; -0.415], <i>p</i> = 0.0005), renal replacement therapy (-0.149, [-0.046; -0.252], <i>p</i> = 0.0044), and having received more than four platelet units (-0.157, [-0.031; -0.283], <i>p</i> = 0.0146) as predictors of poor HRQOL.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We report that survivors of VV-ECMO have reduced HRQOL in multiple domains at 6 months, with pain reported most frequently. Patients who had limb ischaemia, renal replacement therapy or were transfused more than four units of platelets are particularly at risk of poor HRQOL and may benefit from added support measures.</p>","PeriodicalId":39161,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","volume":"24 3","pages":"283-291"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://ftp.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pub/pmc/oa_pdf/1f/e2/10.1177_17511437221111639.PMC10515334.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Intensive Care Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17511437221111639","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/6/29 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) is a form of life support used in severe respiratory failure. While the short-term complications of VV-ECMO are well described, impacts on health-related quality of life (HRQOL) are less well characterised. This study aims to assess the HRQOL of patients who underwent VV-ECMO for acute severe respiratory failure and explore predictors of poor HRQOL.

Methods: We performed a retrospective, observational study of a large cohort of adults who underwent VV-ECMO for acute severe respiratory failure in a single tertiary centre (June 2013-March 2019). Patients surviving critical care discharge were invited to a six-month clinic, where they completed an EQ-5D-5L questionnaire assessing HRQOL. Multivariate analysis was performed to assess prognostic factors for HRQOL.

Results: Among the 245 consecutive patients included in this study (median age 45 years), 187 (76.3%) survived until ECMO decannulation and 172 (70.2%) until hospital discharge. Of those, 98 (57.3%) attended a follow-up clinic at a mean (±SD) of 204 (±45) days post-discharge. Patients reported problems with pain/discomfort (56%), usual daily activities (53%), anxiety/depression (49%), mobility (46%), and personal care (21%). Multivariate analysis identified limb ischaemia (-0.266, 95% C.I. [-0.116; -0.415], p = 0.0005), renal replacement therapy (-0.149, [-0.046; -0.252], p = 0.0044), and having received more than four platelet units (-0.157, [-0.031; -0.283], p = 0.0146) as predictors of poor HRQOL.

Conclusion: We report that survivors of VV-ECMO have reduced HRQOL in multiple domains at 6 months, with pain reported most frequently. Patients who had limb ischaemia, renal replacement therapy or were transfused more than four units of platelets are particularly at risk of poor HRQOL and may benefit from added support measures.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
体外膜肺氧合治疗急性严重呼吸衰竭患者的健康相关生活质量预测指标。
背景:静脉-静脉体外膜肺氧合(VV-ECMO)是一种用于严重呼吸衰竭的生命支持形式。虽然VV-ECMO的短期并发症得到了很好的描述,但对健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)的影响却没有得到很好的表征。本研究旨在评估因急性严重呼吸衰竭而接受VV-ECMO的患者的HRQOL,并探讨HRQOL差的预测因素。重症监护出院后幸存的患者被邀请到一家为期六个月的诊所,在那里他们完成了一份评估HRQOL的EQ-5D-5L问卷。对HRQOL的预后因素进行了多因素分析。结果:在纳入本研究的245名连续患者(中位年龄45岁)中,187名(76.3%)存活到ECMO拔管,172名(70.2%)存活到出院。其中,98人(57.3%)在出院后204(±45)天的平均(±SD)就诊于随访诊所。患者报告有疼痛/不适(56%)、日常活动(53%)、焦虑/抑郁(49%)、行动不便(46%)和个人护理(21%)等问题。多因素分析确定肢体缺血(-0.266,95%C.I.[0.116;-0.415],p=0.0005)、肾脏替代治疗(-0.149,-0.046;-0.252],p=0.00044)和接受四个以上血小板单位(-0.157,-0.031;-0.283],p=0.0146)是HRQOL差的预测因素,疼痛报告最频繁。患有肢体缺血、肾脏替代治疗或输注血小板超过四个单位的患者尤其有HRQOL差的风险,并可能受益于额外的支持措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Intensive Care Society
Journal of the Intensive Care Society Nursing-Critical Care Nursing
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
45
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Intensive Care Society (JICS) is an international, peer-reviewed journal that strives to disseminate clinically and scientifically relevant peer-reviewed research, evaluation, experience and opinion to all staff working in the field of intensive care medicine. Our aim is to inform clinicians on the provision of best practice and provide direction for innovative scientific research in what is one of the broadest and most multi-disciplinary healthcare specialties. While original articles and systematic reviews lie at the heart of the Journal, we also value and recognise the need for opinion articles, case reports and correspondence to guide clinically and scientifically important areas in which conclusive evidence is lacking. The style of the Journal is based on its founding mission statement to ‘instruct, inform and entertain by encompassing the best aspects of both tabloid and broadsheet''.
期刊最新文献
Delivery of evidence-based critical care practices across the United Kingdom: A UK-wide multi-site service evaluation in adult units. In vivo assessment of a modification of a domiciliary ventilator which reduces oxygen consumption in mechanically ventilated patients. Management of adult mechanically ventilated patients: A UK-wide survey. Small volume fluid resuscitation and supplementation with 20% albumin versus buffered crystalloids in adults with septic shock: A protocol for a randomised feasibility trial. Should viscoelastic testing be a standard point-of-care test on all intensive care units?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1